Personality Affects Dispositional Trust and History-Based Trust in Different Ways

References

• Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aramrattana, M., Larsson, T., Jansson, J., Englund, C. (2015, June). Dimensions of cooperative driving, its and automation. In 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 144–149). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225677
   Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., Pereira, M., Petzoldt, T., & Krems, J. (2015). Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 35(8), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Berenbaum, H., Bredemeier, K., & Thompson, R. J. (2008). Intolerance of uncertainty: Exploring its dimensionality and associations with need for cognitive closure, psychopathology, and personality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-Y., Sycara, K., Liu, J.-S., Kumru, A. (2016). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601192
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo personality inventory-revised (NEO PI-R): Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D. (2003). The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00039-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., Rawson, K. A., & Girotto, S. (2007). Comprehension and situation awareness. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, & T. J. Perfect (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 163–193). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, J., & Markkula, G. (2007). Effects of visual and cognitive distraction on lane change test performance. In Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (Vol. 4). Volvo Stevenson.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, G. M., Bowman, D. S., & Llaneras, R. E. (2014). Distracted driver performance to multiple alerts in a multiple-conflict scenario. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(8), 1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814531785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., & Neukum, A. (2017). Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., LI, W., Liang, J., Pan, H., Xu, W., & Shen, M. (2021). Trust in automated vehicles. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(12), 2172–2183. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.02172
   Google Scholar
• Garske, J. P. (1976). Personality and generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Psychological Reports, 39(2), 649–650. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1976.39.2.649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2015). Trust in automation–Before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(3), 3025–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847
   Google Scholar
• Gremillion, G. M., Metcalfe, J. S., Marathe, A. R., Paul, V. J., Christensen, J., Drnec, K., Haynes, B., & Atwater, C. (2016). Analysis of trust in autonomy for convoy operations [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the Micro-and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications VIII. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2224009
   Google Scholar
• Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., Davidsson, S. (2013). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516554
   Google Scholar
• Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors, 58(3), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815625744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 114–158). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, K. (2018). Man arrested for drunk driving after officers found him asleep in Tesla running in autopilot mode. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2018/11/30/man-arrested-drunk-driving-asleep-tesla-autopilot-mode/
   Google Scholar
• Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus, J. M., Nothdurft, F., Hock, P., Scholz, D., Minker, W., Baumann, M. (2016). Human after all: Effects of mere presence and social interaction of a humanoid robot as a co-driver in automated driving. Paper presented at the Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, J. M., Sturn, J., Reiser, J. E., & Baumann, M. (2015). Anthropomorphic agents, transparent automation and driver personality: toward an integrative multi-level model of determinants for effective driver-vehicle cooperation in highly automated vehicles [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Nottingham, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809738
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Yao, N., Shi, Y., Nie, W., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Liang, J., Chen, F., & Gao, Z. (2020). Personality openness predicts driver trust in automated driving. Automotive Innovation, 3(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-019-00086-w
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. (2000). Culture, mental models, and national prosperity. In Culture matters: How values shape human progress (pp. 282–295). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., & Campbell, S. E. (1998). Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 42, pp. 821–825). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129804201111
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., Joyner, L., Gilliland, K., Huggins, J., & Falconer, S. (1999). Validation of a comprehensive stress state questionnaire: Towards a state big three? In I. Merville, I. J. Deary, F. DeFruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 335–350). Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, M., Carter, L., & Ntuen, C. (2012). The impact of personality on nurses’ bias towards automated decision aid acceptance. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 6(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2012.051148
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, L. J., Ryan, L. H., Pradhan, A. K., Eby, D. W., Louis, R. M. S., & Zakrajsek, J. S. (2018). Understanding trust and acceptance of automated vehicles: An exploratory simulator study of transfer of control between automated and manual driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58(7), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Z. D. (2018). Tesla driver, passed out drunk, tells highway patrol autopilot was in charge. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2018/01/22/tesla-drunk-driver-autopilot/
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board (2018, March). Preliminary report: Crash and post-crash fire of electric-powered passenger vehicle. Retrieved from https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/HWY18FH011-preliminary.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Oehler, A., & Wedlich, F. (2018). The relationship of extraversion and neuroticism with risk attitude, risk perception, and return expectations. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 11(2), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(7), 1215–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00087-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzoldt, T., Bellem, H., & Krems, J. F. (2014). The critical tracking task: a potentially useful method to assess driver distraction? Human Factors, 56(4), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813501864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W. (2005). The nature of personality: Genes, culture, and national character. Science, 310(5745), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Tscheligi, M. (2014). Towards autonomous cars: The effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, F., Hjälmdahl, M., Cañas, J., Alonso, M., Garayo, P., Macchi, L., Nathan, F., Ojeda, L., Papakostopoulos, V., Panou, M., Bekiaris, E. (2004). Literature review of behavioural effects. Deliverable 1.2.1 of AIDE IST-1-507674-IP. http://www.aide-eu.org/pdf/sp1_deliv_new/aide_d1_2_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2018). SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Warrendale.
   Google Scholar
• Saffarian, M., De Winter, J. C., Happee, R. (2012). Automated driving: human-factors issues and design solutions. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Salinger, J. (2012). Human factors for limited-ability autonomous driving systems. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, Irvine, CA. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2012/Automation/presentations/Salinger.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors, 58(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. E., Scribner, D. R. (2015). Individual differences, trust, and vehicle autonomy: A pilot study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591242
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Automation- induced “complacency”: Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0302_2
   Google Scholar
• Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(2), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., & Dai, X. Y. (2011). Development of the Chinese big five personality inventory (CBF-PI) III: Psychometric properties of CBF-PI brief version. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Watzenig, D., & Horn, M. (2016). Automated driving: safer and more efficient future driving. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52(3), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W. (2019). User-centered design (IV): Human-centered artificial intelligence. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 25(4), 291–305.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W. (2020). User centered design (V): From automation to autonomy and autonomous vehicles in the intelligent era. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 26(2), 108–129.
   Google Scholar
• Zihsler, J., Hock, P., Walch, M., Dzuba, K., Schwager, D., Szauer, P., Rukzio, E. (2016). Carvatar: increasing trust in highly-automated driving through social cues. Paper presented at the Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
   Google Scholar