XFlag: Explainable Fake News Detection Model on Social Media

References

• Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arras, L., Arjona-Medina, J., Widrich, M., Montavon, G., Gillhofer, M., Müller, K.-R., Hochreiter, S., & Samek, W. (2019). Explaining and interpreting LSTMs. In Explainable ai: Interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning (pp. 211–238). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arras, L., Montavon, G., Müller, K.-R., & Samek, W. (2017). Explaining recurrent neural network predictions in sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07206
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, J., Yang, X. J., & Zhou, F. (2021). Combat COVID-19 infodemic using explainable natural language processing models. Information Processing & Management, 58(4), 102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Klauschen, F., Müller, K.-R., & Samek, W. (2015). On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PLoS One, 10(7), e0130140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, G., Wu, T., Zhou, J., Fok, R., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., … Weld, D. (2021, May). Does the whole exceed its parts? The effect of ai explanations on complementary team performance. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445717
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskara, A., Skinner, M., & Loft, S. (2020). Agent transparency: A review of current theory and evidence. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.2965529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E., Hussain, F., & Dillon, T. (2006). Trust and reputation for service-oriented environments: technologies for building business intelligence and consumer confidence. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2021). Explaining models by propagating Shapley values of local components. In Explainable AI in Healthcare and Medicine (pp. 261–270). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. Y., Procci, K., Boyce, M., Wright, J., Garcia, A., & Barnes, M. (2014). Situation awareness-based agent transparency. Army research lab aberdeen proving ground md human research and engineering directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Kumru, A., & Liu, J. S. (2020). Influence of culture, transparency, trust, and degree of automation on automation use. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2931755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Liu, J. S., & Kumru, A. (2016). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 60(1), 840–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601192
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Liu, J.-S., & Kumru, A. (2018). The effect of culture on trust in automation: Reliability and workload. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L., & Chen, Y. (2015). Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082
   Google Scholar
• Das, S. D., Basak, A., & Dutta, S. (2021). A heuristic-driven uncertainty based ensemble framework for fake news detection in tweets and news articles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.01791
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Su, H., Zhu, J., Zhang, B. (2017). Improving interpretability of deep neural networks with semantic information. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4306–4314).
   Google Scholar
• Feng, V. W., Hirst, G. (2013). Detecting deceptive opinions with profile compatibility. In Proceedings of the sixth international joint conference on natural language processing (pp. 338–346).
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedikli, F., Jannach, D., & Ge, M. (2014). How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramlich, J. (2019, May 16). 10 facts about Americans and Facebook https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/16/facts-about-americans-and-facebook/
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in Psychology, 52(C), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, D., Stefik, M., Choi, J., Miller, T., Stumpf, S., & Yang, G.-Z. (2019). XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence. Science Robotics, 4(37), 1. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120
   Google Scholar
• Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000). Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 241–250). https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.358995
   Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/15188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., Moravec, P. L., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Combating fake news on social media with source ratings: The effects of user and expert reputation ratings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(3), 931–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1628921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980
   Google Scholar
• Le, Q., Mikolov, T. (2014). Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1188–1196). PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, T., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2016). Rationalizing neural predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04155
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. C., & Stone, B. A. (1997). Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents (pp. 16–21). https://doi.org/10.1145/267658.269943
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y.-J., & Li, C.-T. (2020). GCAN: Graph-aware co-attention networks for explainable fake news detection on social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.11648
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B. (2013). Being transparent about transparency: A model for human-robot interaction. In 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
   Google Scholar
• Madumal, P., Singh, R., Newn, J., & Vetere, F. (2018). Interaction design for explainable AI: Workshop proceedings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08597
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., Kwon, S., Jansen, B. J., Wong, K.-F., & Cha, M. (2016). Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Gao, W., & Wong, K.-F. (2018). Rumor detection on twitter with tree-structured recursive neural networks. Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, J. E., Rupp, M. A., Chen, J. Y., Barnes, M. J., Barber, D., & Procci, K. (2016). Intelligent agent transparency in human–agent teaming for Multi-UxV management. Human Factors, 58(3), 401–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., Sturm, B. L., & Dixon, S. (2017). Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations for music content analysis. In ISMIR, pp. 537–543.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, C. (2019). Interpretable machine learning. A guide for making black box models explainable. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book.
   Google Scholar
• Moravec, P., Kim, A., & Dennis, A. R. (2020). Appealing to sense and sensibility: System 1 and system 2 interventions for fake news on social media. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravec, P., Kim, A., Dennis, A. R., Minas, R. (2018a). Do you really know if it’s true? How asking users to rate stories affects belief in fake news on social media. How asking users to rate stories affects belief in fake news on social media (October 22, 2018). Kelley School of Business Research Paper, (pp. 18–89).
   Google Scholar
• Moravec, P., Minas, R., & Dennis, A. R. (2018b). Fake news on social media: People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all. Kelley School of Business Research Paper, pp. 18–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, M., Cardie, C., Hancock, J. T. (2013). Negative deceptive opinion spam. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies (pp. 497–501).
   Google Scholar
• Pynadath, D. V., Barnes, M. J., Wang, N., & Chen, J. Y. (2018). Transparency communication for machine learning in human-automation interaction. In Human and machine learning (pp. 75–90). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1135–1144).
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. L., & Lukoianova, T. (2015). Truth and deception at the rhetorical structure level. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., & Liu, Y. (2017). Csi: A hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 797–806).
   Google Scholar
• Selkowitz, A. R., Lakhmani, S. G., Larios, C. N., Chen, J. Y. (2016). Agent transparency and the autonomous squad member. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp 1319–1323). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601305
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., Shcherbina, A., & Kundaje, A. (2016). Not just a black box: Learning important features through propagating activation differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01713
   Google Scholar
• Shu, K., Cui, L., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2019). defend: Explainable fake news detection. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining (pp. 395–405).
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., Jr, Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorou, A., Wortham, R. H., & Bryson, J. J. (2017). Designing and implementing transparency for real time inspection of autonomous robots. Connection Science, 29(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2017.1310182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2020). Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Guo, Y. (2020). Empower rumor events detection from Chinese microblogs with multi-type individual information. Knowledge and Information Systems, 62(9), 3585–3614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-020-01463-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Pynadath, D. V., Hill, S. G. (2016). The impact of POMDP-generated explanations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on autonomous agents & multiagent systems (pp. 997–1005).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Qian, S., Hu, J., Fang, Q., & Xu, C. (2020). Fake news detection via knowledge-driven multimodal graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (pp. 540–547). https://doi.org/10.1145/3372278.3390713
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Mythbusters. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Pentyala, S. K., Mohseni, S., Du, M., Yuan, H., Linder, R., … Hu, X. (2019). Xfake: Explainable fake news detector with visualizations. In The World Wide Web Conference (pp. 3600–3604). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3314119
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Huang, Q., Zhou, X., & Sha, Y. (2020). Iarnet: An information aggregating and reasoning network over heterogeneous graph for fake news detection. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207406
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, C., Ma, Q., Zhou, W., Han, J., & Hu, S. (2019). Jointly embedding the local and global relations of heterogeneous graph for rumor detection. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 796–805). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2019.00090
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Fan, Z., Zheng, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). An improving deception detection method in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Networks, 7(11), 1811. https://doi.org/10.4304/jnw.7.11.1811-1816
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, R., Benbasat, I., & Cavusoglu, H. (2019). Transparency in advice-giving systems: A framework and a research model for transparency provision. In IUI Workshops.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Booth, S., Ribeiro, M. T., & Shah, J. (2021). Do feature attribution methods correctly attribute features? arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.14403
   Google Scholar