Transparency through Explanations and Justifications in Human-Robot Task-Based Communications

References

• Allen, J. F., & Perrault, C. R. (1980). Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15(3), 143–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90042-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, T., Kasenberg, D., & Scheutz, M. (2021). Explaining in time: Meeting interactive standards of explanation for robotic systems. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 10(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: Lecture I. How to Do Things with Words: JL Austin, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Berzan, C., & Scheutz, M. (2012). What am i doing? automatic construction of an agent’s state-transition diagram through introspection. In Proceedings of AAMAS 2012. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonial, C., Donatelli, L., Abrams, M., Lukin, S., Tratz, S., Marge, M., et al. (2020). Dialogue-amr: Abstract meaning representation for dialogue. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 684–695).
   Google Scholar
• Brick, T., Scheutz, M. (2007, March). Incremental natural language processing for hri. In Proceedings of the Second ACM IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 263–270).
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2011, June). Facilitating mental modeling in collaborative human-robot interaction through adverbial cues. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference (pp. 239–247). Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2012). Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and distress. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 238–247). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2013). A hybrid architectural approach to understanding and appropriately generating indirect speech acts. In Proceedings of Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1213–1219).
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2014). How robots can affect human behavior: Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and distress. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0235-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2015). “Sorry, i can’t do that:” Developing mechanisms to appropriately reject directives in human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of the 2015 AAAI Fall Symposium on AI and HRI.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Strategies and mechanisms to enable dialogue agents to respond appropriately to indirect speech acts. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 26th IEEE International Symposium on.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., McConnell, I., & Scheutz, M. (2015). When robots object: Evidence for the utility of verbal, but not necessarily spoken protest. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Robotics.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Enabling robots to understand indirect speech acts in task-based interactions. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 6(1), 64–94. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Briggs
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G., Williams, T., Jackson, R. B., & Scheutz, M. (2022). Why and how robots should say ‘no’. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00780-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33(V1), 1877–1901. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, R., Potapova, E., Krause, E., Zillich, M., & Scheutz, M. (2012). Incremental referent grounding with nlp-biased visual search. In Proceedings of AAAI 2012 Workshop on Grounding Language for Physical Systems. Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, R., Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., & Wu, X. (2010, March). Robust spoken instruction understanding for HRI. In Proceedings of the 2010 Human-Robot Interaction Conference (pp. 275–282).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. Y., Procci, K., Boyce, M., Wright, J., Garcia, A., & Barnes, M. (2014). Situation awareness-based agent transparency. (Tech. Rep.). Army Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L. (1993). Wizard of oz studies–why and how. Knowledge-Based Systems, 6(4), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(93)90017-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzifcak, J., Scheutz, M., Baral, C., & Schermerhorn, P. (2009, May). What to do and how to do it: Translating natural language directives into temporal and dynamic logic representation for goal management and action execution. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA ’09). Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frasca, T., Oosterveld, B., Krause, E., & Scheutz, M. (2018). One-shot interaction learning from natural language instruction and demonstration. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 6, 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Frasca, T., Thielstrom, R., Krause, E., & Scheutz, M. (2020). “Can you do this?” self-assessment dialogues with autonomous robots before, during, and after a mission. In HRI workshop on assessing, explaining, and conveying robot proficiency for human-robot teaming. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.01527
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. J., & Hinds, P. J. (2006). Who should I blame? Effects of autonomy and transparency on attributions in human-robot interaction. In ROMAN 2006 – The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 80–85).
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, J., & Scheutz, M. (2007). Reflection and reasoning mechanisms for failure detection and recovery in a distributed robotic architecture for complex robots. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April (pp. 3699–3704).
   Google Scholar
• Krause, E., Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2012). Crossing boundaries: Multi-level introspection in a complex robotic architecture for automatic performance improvements. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B. (2013). Being transparent about transparency: A model for human-robot interaction. In 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. (2014). Moral competence in social robots. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F., Rosen, E., Chi, V. B., Berg, M., & Haas, P. (2020). A general methodology for teaching norms to social robots. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1395–1402). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223610
   Google Scholar
• Milli, S., Hadfield-Menell, D., Dragan, A., & Russell, S. (2017). Should robots be obedient?. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, L. (1988). Knowledge preconditions for actions and plans. In Readings in distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 192–199). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sarathy, V., Tsuetaki, A., Roque, A., & Scheutz, M. (2020). Reasoning requirements for indirect speech act interpretation. In Proceedings of COLING 2020: The 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn, P., Kramer, J., Brick, T., Anderson, D., Dingler, A., & Scheutz, M. (2006). Diarc: A testbed for natural human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of AAAI 2006 Mobile Robot Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M. (2014). The need for moral competency in autonomous agent architectures. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Briggs, G., Cantrell, R., Krause, E., Williams, T., & Veale, R. (2013). Novel mechanisms for natural human-robot interactions in the diarc architecture. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Robotic Systems. AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Cantrell, R., & Schermerhorn, P. (2011). Toward humanlike task-based dialogue processing for human robot interaction. AI Magazine, 32(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v32i4.2381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Eberhard, K., & Andronache, V. (2004). A parallel, distributed, realtime, robotic model for human reference resolution with visual constraints. Connection Science, 16(3), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090412331314803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Krause, E., Oosterveld, B., Frasca, T., & Platt, R. (2017). Spoken instruction-based one-shot object and action learning in a cognitive robotic architecture. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autoomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Krause, E., Oosterveld, B., Frasca, T., & Platt, R. (2018). Recursive spoken instruction-based one-shot object and action learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5354–5358).
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., Kramer, J., & Anderson, D. (2007). First steps toward natural human-like HRI. Autonomous Robots, 22(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9018-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheutz, M., Williams, T., Krause, E., Oosterveld, B., Sarathy, V., & Frasca, T. (2019). An overview of the distributed integrated affect and reflection cognitive diarc architecture. In M. I. A. Ferreira, J. S. Sequeira, & R. Ventura (Eds.), Cognitive architectures. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Speech acts (pp. 59–82). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Sycara, K., & Sukthankar, G. (2006). Literature review of teamwork models. Robotics Institute. Carnegie Mellon University, 31, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Talamadupula, K., Briggs, G., Scheutz, M., & Kambhampti, S. (2017). Architectural mechanisms for handling human instructions for open-world mixed-initiative team tasks and goals. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 5, 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tellex, S., Gopalan, N., Kress-Gazit, H., & Matuszek, C. (2020). Robots that use language. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 3(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-101119-071628
   Google Scholar
• Thielstrom, R., Roque, A., Chita-Tegmark, M., & Scheutz, M. (2020). Generating explanations of action failures in a cognitive robotic architecture. In Proceedings of NL4XAI: 2nd Workshop on interactive natural language technology for explainable artificial intelligence. Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Traum, D., & Allen, J. F. (1994). Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9407011.
   Google Scholar
• Traum, D., Rickel, J., Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2003). Negotiation over tasks in hybrid human-agent teams for simulation-based training. In Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 441–448).
   Google Scholar
• Veale, R., Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2013). Linking cognitive tokens to biological signals: Dialogue context improves neural speech recognizer performance. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2015). A domain-independent model of open-world reference resolution. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Acharya, S., Schreitter, S., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Situated open world reference resolution for human-robot dialogue. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Briggs, G., Oosterveld, B., & Scheutz, M. (2015). Going beyond command- based instructions: Extending robotic natural language interaction capabilities. In Proceedings of AAAI. AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Nunez, R. C., Briggs, G., Scheutz, M., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2014). A dempster-shafer theoretic approach to understanding indirect speech acts. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Thames, D., Novakoff, J., & Scheutz, M. (2018). “Thank you for sharing that interesting fact!”: Effects of capability and context on indirect speech act use in task-based human-robot dialogue. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Tino, P., Leonardis, A., & Tang, K. (2021). A survey on neural network interpretability. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 5(5), 726–742. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2021.3100641
   Google Scholar