Toward Hazard or Action? Effects of Directional Vibrotactile Takeover Requests on Takeover Performance in Automated Driving

References

• Asif, A., Heuten, W., Boll, S. (2009). Acceptance of tactile belts for directional information representation in automobiles. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., Nidhi, K., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Borowsky, A., Shinar, D., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2010). Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 42(4), 1240–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., Brown, J. L., Graving, J. S., Richard, C. M., Lichty, M. G., Bacon, L. P., & Morgan, J. F. (2018). Human factors design guidance for level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts (Report No. DOT HS 812 555). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Šabić, E., Mishler, S., Parker, C., & Yamaguchi, M. (2020). Effectiveness of lateral auditory collision warnings: Should warnings be toward danger or toward safety? Human Factors, 64(2), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820941618
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Lazry, G., Katzman, N., Borowsky, A., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2019). Directional tactile alerts for take-over requests in highly-automated driving. Transportation Research Part F, 65, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.025
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Zhou, F., Pulver, E. M., Molnar, L. J., Robert, L. P., Tilbury, D. M., Yang, X. J. (2021). Towards standardized metrics for measuring takeover performance in conditionally automated driving: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 65th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1065–1069). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651213
   Google Scholar
• Damböck, D., & Bengler, K. (2012). Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, 5, 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F., Happee, R., Martens, M. H., & Stanton, N. A. (2014). Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F, 27, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, J., Hu, J., & Petermeijer, B. (2022). Ipsilateral and contralateral warnings: Effects on decision-making and eye movements in near-collision scenarios. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-022-00390-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, S. C., van Erp, J. B., & Kiefer, R. J. (2009). Direction coding using a tactile chair. Applied Ergonomics, 40(3), 477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, A., Petermeijer, S. M., Zimmermann, M., De Winter, J. C., Bengler, K. J., & Stanton, N. A. (2018). Rolling out the red (and green) carpet: Supporting driver decision making in automation-to-manual transitions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2883862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 109, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geitner, C., Biondi, F., Skrypchuk, L., Jennings, P., & Birrell, S. (2019). The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario. Transportation Research Part F, 65, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.06.011
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 57, No.1, pp. 1938–1942). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hogema, J. H., De Vries, S. C., Van Erp, J. B., & Kiefer, R. J. (2009). A tactile seat for direction coding in car driving: Field evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2(4), 181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G., & Pitts, B. J. (2022). Takeover requests for automated driving: The effects of signal direction, lead time, and modality on takeover performance. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 165, 106534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., & Ryu, J. H. (2010). The haptic steering wheel: Vibro-tactile based navigation for the driving environment. In 2010 8th IEEE international conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Advances in psychology, human mental workload, North-Holland. (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. O., & Lamb, G. D. (1981). Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: Neural patterns evoked by braille‐like dot patterns in the monkey. The Journal of Physiology, 310(1), 117–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, L. A., & Sarter, N. B. (2008). Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors, 50(1), 90–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapitaniak, B., Walczak, M., Kosobudzki, M., Jóźwiak, Z., & Bortkiewicz, A. (2015). Application of eye-tracking in drivers testing: A review of research. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 28(6), 941–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., Cassavaugh, N., Horrey, W. J., Becic, E., & Mayhugh, J. L. (2007). Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving. Human Factors, 49(5), 935–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, D., Sayer, J., Winkler, C., Ervin, R., Bogard, S., Devonshire, J., Mefford, M., Hagan, M., Bareket, Z., Goodsell, R., & Gordon, T. (2006). Road departure crash warning system field operational test: Methodology and results (No. UMTRI-2006–9-2). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, N., Yang, J., Yu, D., Prakah-Asante, K. O., Curry, R., Blommer, M., Swaminathan, R., & Pitts, B. J. (2021). Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 157, 106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, D. P., Santee, W. R., Blanchard, L. A., Karis, A. J., Carter, A. J., & Potter, A. W. (2018). Cardiorespiratory responses to heavy military load carriage over complex terrain. Applied Ergonomics, 73, 194–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohebbi, R., Gray, R., & Tan, H. Z. (2009). Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone. Human Factors, 51(1), 102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., Wu, C., Zhang, J., Zeng, X., Zhao, G., & Sun, X. (2019). Looking for an optimal pedal layout to improve the driving performance of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Applied Ergonomics, 80, 43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., Zhang, W., Yang, Z., Kang, C., Wu, C., Chai, C., Shi, J., & Li, H. (2020). Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance. Traffic Injury Prevention, 21(7), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1804060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., Zhang, W., Yang, Z., Kang, C., Wu, C., Chai, C., Shi, J., Zeng, Y., & Li, H. (2021). Take over gradually in conditional automated driving: The effect of two-stage warning systems on situation awareness, driving stress, takeover performance, and acceptance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(4), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1860514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F., & Spence, C. (2015). Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 75, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Lai, F. C. H., Daly, M., & Carsten, O. M. J. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F, 27, 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Arning, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes. The American Journal of Psychology, 122(3), 325–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S. M., de Winter, J. C. F., & Bengler, K. J. (2016). Vibrotactile displays: A survey with a view on highly automated driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(4), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2494873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S. M., Cieler, S., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2017). Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 99(Pt A), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., & de Winter, J. (2017). Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfleging, B., Rang, M., & Broy, N. (2016). Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’16 (pp. 91–99). New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sakia, R. M. (1992). The Box‐Cox transformation technique: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 41(2), 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2021). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, S., Borowsky, A., Zilberstein, S., & Fisher, D. L. (2016). Minimum time to situation awareness in scenarios involving transfer of control from an automated driving suite. Transportation Research Record, 2602(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.3141/2602-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šabić, E., Chen, J., & MacDonald, J. A. (2021). Toward a better understanding of in-vehicle auditory warnings and background noise. Human Factors, 63(2), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819879311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfe-Scherf, M. S. L., & Russwinkel, N. (2021). Familiarity and complexity during a takeover in highly automated driving. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 19(3), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-021-00259-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., & Schroeder, B. (2001). Supporting decision making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: The case of in-flight icing. Human Factors, 43(4), 573–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze, N. N., & Song, Z. (2019). Factors contributing to injury severity in work zone related crashes in New Zealand. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1452083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straughn, S. M., Gray, R., & Tan, H. Z. (2009). To go or not to go: Stimulus-response compatibility for tactile and auditory pedestrian collision warnings. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2009.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanghavi, H., Jeon, M., Nadri, C., Ko, S., Sodnik, J., & Stojmenova, K. (2021). Multimodal takeover request displays for semi-automated vehicles: Focused on spatiality and lead time. In International Conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 315–334). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Cardoso, M., Theodorakos, I., & Beurier, G. (2019). A parametric investigation on seat/occupant contact forces and their relationship with initially perceived discomfort using a configurable seat. Ergonomics, 62(7), 891–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, J., & Wu, C. (2018). The effects of lead time of take-over request and nondriving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(6), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2844251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D.-Y D., Pick, R. F., Proctor, R. W., & Ye, Y. (2007). Effect of a side collision-avoidance signal on simulated driving with a navigation system [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 206–211). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1238
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. H., Kim, Y. W., & Ji, Y. G. (2019). The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 123, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Shi, J., Wu, B., Ma, S., Kang, C., Zhang, W., & Li, H. (2020). Effect of warning graphics location on driving performance: An eye movement study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1597573
   Google Scholar
• You, F., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, X., & Hansen, P. (2018). Take-over requests analysis in conditional automated driving and driver visual research under encountering road hazard of highway. In I. L. Nunes (Ed.), Advances in human factors and systems interaction (pp. 230–240). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2015). What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 78, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2016). Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 92, 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., de Winter, J., Varotto, S., Happee, R., & Martens, M. (2019). Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies. Transportation Research Part F, 64, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.020
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Yan, X., & Yang, Z. (2015). Discrimination of effects between directional and nondirectional information of auditory warning on driving behavior. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/980281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Zeng, Y., Yang, Z., Kang, C., Wu, C., Shi, J., Ma, S., & Li, H. (2021). Optimal time intervals in two-stage takeover warning systems with insight into the drivers’ neuroticism personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 601536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar