Evaluating Users’ Auditory Affective Preference for Humanoid Robot Voices through Neural Dynamics

References

• Aftanas, L. I., & Golocheikine, S. A. (2001). Human anterior and frontal midline theta and lower alpha reflect emotionally positive state and internalized attention: High-resolution EEG investigation of meditation. Neuroscience Letters, 310(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02094-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., & Berns, G. S. (2010). Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronovitch, C. D. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. The Journal of Social Psychology, 99(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1976.9924774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babel, M., McGuire, G., & King, J. (2014). Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness. PLoS One, 9(2), e88616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, A., Parada-Cabaleiro, E., Hantke, S., Burkhardt, F., Cummins, N., & Schuller, B. (2018). The perception and analysis of the likeability and human likeness of synthesized speech [Paper presentation]. 19th annual conference of the international speech communication association (Interspeech 2018), Hyderabad, India (Vol, 1–6, pp. 2863–2867). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1093
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, S., Broyd, S. J., Benikos, N., Ward, R., Wiersema, J. R., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2015). The late positive potential: A neural marker of the regulation of emotion-based approach-avoidance actions? Biological Psychology, 105, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başar, E., Güntekin, B., & Öniz, A. (2006). Principles of oscillatory brain dynamics and a treatise of recognition of faces and facial expressions. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(06)59004-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin, M., De Beaumont, L., Vannasing, P., Turcotte, A., Arcand, C., Belin, P., & Lassonde, M. (2006). Electrophysiological markers of voice familiarity. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(11), 3081–3086. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04856.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens, S. I., Egsvang, A. K. K., Hansen, M., & Møllegård-Schroll, A. M. (2018). Gendered robot voices and their influence on trust [Paper presentation]. Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3177009
   Google Scholar
• Bekkedal, M. Y., Rossi, J., III, & Panksepp, J. (2011). Human brain EEG indices of emotions: Delineating responses to affective vocalizations by measuring frontal theta event-related synchronization. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(9), 1959–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin, P. (2006). Voice processing in human and non-human primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2091–2107. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M., & Nugent, S. (2011). Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(7-8), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., & Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretie, L., Martin-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., & Mercado, F. (2001). Emotion and attention interaction studied through event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(8), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892901753294400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R. C.-S., Lu, H.-P., & Yang, P. (2018). Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charest, I., Pernet, C. R., Rousselet, G. A., Quiñones, I., Latinus, M., Fillion-Bilodeau, S., Chartrand, J.-P., & Belin, P. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices. BMC Neuroscience, 10(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaudhry, A. M., Parkinson, J. A., Hinton, E. C., Owen, A. M., & Roberts, A. C. (2009). Preference judgements involve a network of structures within frontal, cingulate and insula cortices. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 29(5), 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06646.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chita-Tegmark, M., Lohani, M., & Scheutz, M. (2019, March 14). Gender effects in perceptions of robots and humans with varying emotional intelligence [Paper presentation]. 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673222
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. X. (2014). Analyzing neural time series data: Theory and practice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. X., & van Gaal, S. (2013). Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors. Cerebral Cortex, 23(5), 1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, X., Wu, C. F., Linz, K. C., Gan, S. Z., & Tseng, T. M. (2020). Effects of different types of social robot voices on affective evaluations in different application fields. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00654-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, X., Wu, C. F., Niu, J., & Pan, K. R. (2022). Effect of voice type and head-light color in social robots for different applications. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(1), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00782-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Stoll, B., Lin, X., & Massey, N. (2019). Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor’s voice: Social identity theory in human-robot interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., De Ruiter, L., & Hegel, F. (2012, January 1). If you sound like me, you must be more human [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '12, Boston, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157717
   Google Scholar
• Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Hegel, F., De Ruiter, L. (2012). Activating elicited agent knowledge: How robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 851–857). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343858
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feil-Seifer, D., & Mataric, M. J. (2005, June 28–July 1). Defining socially assistive robotics. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005 (pp. 465–468). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception, 37(4), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(4), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00019-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Sierra, A., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Percaccio, C. R., Conboy, B. T., Romo, H., Klarman, L., Ortiz, S., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Bilingual language learning: An ERP study relating early brain responses to speech, language input, and later word production. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Ding, Y., Wang, T., Liu, W., & Jin, H. (2016). Applying event related potentials to evaluate user preferences toward smartphone form design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 54, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Hu, M., Duffy, V. G., Shao, H., & Ren, Z. (2021). Kansei evaluation for group of users: A data-driven approach using dominance-based rough sets. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Li, M. M., Chen, J. H., & Duffy, V. G. (2022). Evaluating users’ preference for the appearance of humanoid robots via event-related potentials and spectral perturbations. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(7), 1381–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1876763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Wang, X-s., Liu, W-l., & Ding, Y. (2018). Affective preference measurement of product appearance based on event-related potentials. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(2), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0463-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajcak, G., & Olvet, D. M. (2008). The persistence of attention to emotion: Brain potentials during and after picture presentation. Emotion, 8(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, T. C., Smilek, D., Geiger, L., Liu, C., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). ERP evidence for rapid hedonic evaluation of logos. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. D., & Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. (2013). Cortical connectivity and sensory coding. Nature, 503(7474), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., Xiao, P., Zhang, Z. G., Mouraux, A., & Iannetti, G. D. (2014). Single-trial time–frequency analysis of electrocortical signals: Baseline correction and beyond. NeuroImage, 84, 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffmeijer, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Alink, L. R. A., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2014). Reliability of event-related potentials: The influence of number of trials and electrodes. Physiology & Behavior, 130, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J., Watson, C. I., & Macdonald, B. (2018, August 1). Artificial empathy in social robots: An analysis of emotions in speech [Paper presentation]. 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525652
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J.-H., Kim, S. J., Cho, Y. S., & Kim, S.-P. (2015). Modulation of alpha oscillations in the human EEG with facial preference. PLoS One, 10(9), e0138153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2012a). Effects of subjective preference of colors on attention-related occipital theta oscillations. NeuroImage, 59(1), 808–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2012b). Individual visual working memory capacities and related brain oscillatory activities are modulated by color preferences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, A., Bradley, M. M., Hauk, O., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., & Lang, P. J. (2002). Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. Psychophysiology, 39(5), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3950641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Adolphs, R., O'Doherty, J. P., & Shimojo, S. (2007). Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(46), 18253–18258. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703101104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2–3), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskoj-Plusnin, J. Y., & Bocharov, A. V. (2009). Event-related delta and theta synchronization during explicit and implicit emotion processing. Neuroscience, 164(4), 1588–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S. A., & Paulmann, S. (2011). Emotion, language, and the brain. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(3), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00267.x
   Google Scholar
• Kuhne, K., Fischer, M. H., & Zhou, Y. (2020). The human takes it all: Humanlike synthesized voices are perceived as less eerie and more likable. Evidence from a subjective ratings study. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 14, 593732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2020.593732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, S. S., Kim, J. S., & Choi, J. J. (2017). The effects of organism-versus object-based robot design approaches on the consumer acceptance of domestic robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0388-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2000, April). Can computer-generated speech have gender?: An experimental test of gender stereotype. In M. Tremaine (Ed.), CHI ’00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 289–290). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/633292.633461
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. A., Granot, R., & Bentin, S. (2003). Neural sensitivity to human voices: ERP evidence of task and attentional influences. Psychophysiology, 40(2), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., & Liang, J. (2019). Contextual effects of angry vocal expressions on the encoding and recognition of emotional faces: An event-related potential (ERP) study. Neuropsychologia, 132, 107147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsen, J. P., Jones, R., Shimojo, S., & Bhattacharya, J. (2010). Neural components underlying subjective preferential decision making. NeuroImage, 50(4), 1626–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T. S., Pinheiro, A. P., Deng, G. H., Nestor, P. G., McCarley, R. W., & Niznikiewicz, M. A. (2012). Electrophysiological insights into processing nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Neuroreport, 23(2), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834ea757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Liang, X., Wang, X., & Guo, F. (2019). The evaluation of emotional experience on webpages: An event-related potential study. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0507-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makeig, S., Debener, S., Onton, J., & Delorme, A. (2004). Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcginn, C., & Torre, I. (2019, March 1). Can you tell the robot by the voice? an exploratory study on the role of voice in the perception of robots [Paper presentation]. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673305
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M., Höfel, L., Brattico, E., & Jacobsen, T. (2010). Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons—An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 76(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C. I., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C. I., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niculescu, A., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., Li, H., & See, S. L. (2013). Making social robots more attractive: The effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0171-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niculescu, A., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., & See, S. L. (2011, November 29–December 1). The influence of voice pitch on the evaluation of a social robot receptionist [Paper presentation]. 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Selangor, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1109/iUSEr.2011.6150529
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, J. J. M., & Barclay, P. (2017). The influence of voice pitch on perceptions of trustworthiness across social contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(4), 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 156869–156869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvaz, M. A., Macnamara, A., Goldstein, R. Z., & Hajcak, G. (2012). Event-related induced frontal alpha as a marker of lateral prefrontal cortex activation during cognitive reappraisal. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(4), 730–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0107-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2008). Early emotional prosody perception based on different speaker voices. Neuroreport, 19(2), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f454db
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell, M. D., Rothermich, K., Liu, P., Paulmann, S., Sethi, S., & Rigoulot, S. (2015). Preferential decoding of emotion from human non-linguistic vocalizations versus speech prosody. Biological Psychology, 111, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, A. P., Vasconcelos, M., Dias, M., Arrais, N., & Gonçalves, Ó. F. (2015). The music of language: An ERP investigation of the effects of musical training on emotional prosody processing. Brain and Language, 140, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(6), 2961–2977. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Přibil, J., Přibilová, A., & Matoušek, J. (2020). GMM-based evaluation of synthetic speech quality using 2D classification in pleasure-arousal scale. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010002
   Google Scholar
• Ramsøy, T. Z., Michael, N., & Michael, I. (2019). A consumer neuroscience study of conscious and subconscious destination preference. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51567-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsoy, T. Z., Skov, M., Christensen, M. K., & Stahlhut, C. (2018). Frontal Brain Asymmetry and Willingness to Pay. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, F. A., Bown, O., & Velonaki, M. (2022). Designing sound for social robots: Candidate design principles. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00891-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. L., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2021). A social robot to deliver a psychotherapeutic treatment: Qualitative responses by participants in a randomized controlled trial and future design recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesler, E., Manzey, D., & Onnasch, L. (2021). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Science Robotics, 6(58), eabj5425. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abj5425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenkrants, B., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: Arousal, valence, and gender. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(10), 2260–2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammler, D., Grigutsch, M., Fritz, T., & Koelsch, S. (2007). Music and emotion: Electrophysiological correlates of the processing of pleasant and unpleasant music. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00497.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandygulova, A., & O’Hare, G. M. P. (2018). Age- and gender-based differences in children’s interactions with a gender-matching robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0472-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., & Gunter, T. C. (2017). Temporal signatures of processing voiceness and emotion in sound. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Beyond the right hemisphere: Brain mechanisms mediating vocal emotional processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreibelmayr, S., & Mara, M. (2022). Robot voices in daily life: Vocal human-likeness and application context as determinants of user acceptance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 787499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghöfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. In H. T. Schupp, T. Flaisch, J. Stockburger, & M. Junghöfer (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 156, pp. 31–51). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., Miyake, N. P., Pennefather, P., & Otake-Matsuura, M. (2022). Voice in human-agent interaction: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., & Norton, M. I. (2009). Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp 2563–2568). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354116
   Google Scholar
• Song, S., Baba, J., Nakanishi, J., Yoshikawa, Y., & Ishiguro, H. (2020). Mind the voice!: Effect of robot voice pitch, robot voice gender, and user gender on user perception of teleoperated robots. In R. Bernhaupt, F. F. Mueller, D. Verweij, J. Andres, J. McGrenere, A. Cockburn, I. Avellino, A. Goguey, P. Bjøn, S. Zhao, B. Paul Samson, & R. Kocielnik (Eds.), Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Honolulu, HI, USA (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382988
   Google Scholar
• Steber, S., König, N., Stephan, F., & Rossi, S. (2020). Uncovering electrophysiological and vascular signatures of implicit emotional prosody. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5807. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62761-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamagawa, R., Watson, C. I., Kuo, I. H., MacDonald, B. A., & Broadbent, E. (2011). The effects of synthesized voice accents on user perceptions of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(3), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0100-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashiro, N., Sugata, H., Ikeda, T., Matsushita, K., Hara, M., Kawakami, K., Kawakami, K., & Fujiki, M. (2019). Effect of individual food preferences on oscillatory brain activity. Brain and Behavior, 9(5), e01262. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovato, G., Ramos, J. G., Azevedo, H., Moroni, A., Magossi, S., Simmons, R., Ishii, H., & Takanishi, A. (2017). A receptionist robot for Brazilian people: Study on interaction involving illiterates. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2017-0001
   Google Scholar
• Turk, O., & Schroder, M. (2010). Evaluation of expressive speech synthesis with voice conversion and copy resynthesis techniques. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 18(5), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2010.2041113
   Google Scholar
• Uusberg, A., Thiruchselvam, R., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Using distraction to regulate emotion: Insights from EEG theta dynamics. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 91(3), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, M. L., Syrdal, D. S., Koay, K. L., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R. (2008). Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles. In RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 707–712). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R. W. Y., Chang, Y. C., & Chuang, S. W. (2016). EEG spectral dynamics of video commercials: Impact of the narrative on the branding product preference. Scientific Reports, 6, 36487. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werheid, K., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2007). Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 76(1–2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Haufe, S., & Tangermann, M. (2011). Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 7(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-7-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K. (2019). First encounter with robot Alpha: How individual differences interact with vocal and kinetic cues in users' social responses. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2522–2547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819851479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive-factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1086/208905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Liu, M., Li, W., & Sommer, W. (2020). Human voice attractiveness processing: Electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 150, 107827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Compton, B. J., Heyman, G. D., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Vocal attractiveness and voluntarily pitch-shifted voices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zougkou, K., Weinstein, N., & Paulmann, S. (2017). ERP correlates of motivating voices: Quality of motivation and time-course matters. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(10), 1687–1700. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar