User Adoption of Intelligent Environments: A Review of Technology Adoption Models, Challenges, and Prospects

References

• Adell, E. (2010). Acceptance of driver support systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 475–486).
   Google Scholar
• Abowd, G., Atkeson, C., & Essa, I. (1998). Ubiquitous smart spaces. A white paper submitted to DARPA.
   Google Scholar
• Acampora, G., & Loia, V. (2005). Using FML and fuzzy technology in adaptive ambient intelligence environments. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 1(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.5019/j.ijcir.2005.33
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fisbbein, M. (1974). Factors influencing intentions and the intention-behavior relation. Human Relations, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677402700101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi, A., & Sohaib, O. (2021). Technology readiness and cryptocurrency adoption: PLS-SEM and deep learning neural network analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 21388–21394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augusto, J. C., Callaghan, V., Cook, D., Kameas, A., & Satoh, I. (2013). Intelligent environments: A manifesto. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1962-3-12
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 23–28). Englewood Cliffs.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/249749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, P. S., Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Rompay, T. J. (2019). Accepting the Internet-of-Things in our homes: The role of user skills. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detjen, H., Faltaous, S., Pfleging, B., Geisler, S., & Schneegass, S. (2021). How to increase automated vehicles’ acceptance through in-vehicle interaction design: A review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(4), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1860517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducatel, K. (2001). Union européenne. Technologies de la société de l‘information, Union européenne. Institut d‘études de prospectives technologiques, & Union européenne. Société de l‘information conviviale. Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600791325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, C., Politis, I., Amanatidis, T., & Sarkar, A. (2019, March). Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: The autonomous vehicle acceptance model. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 518–527).
   Google Scholar
• Hubert, M., Blut, M., Brock, C., Zhang, R. W., Koch, V., & Riedl, R. (2019). The influence of acceptance and adoption drivers on smart home usage. European Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, D., & Richardson, H. (2009). What use is domestication theory to information systems research? In Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems (pp. 482–494). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Kaasinen, E., Kymäläinen, T., Niemelä, M., Olsson, T., Kanerva, M., & Ikonen, V. (2012). A user-centric view of intelligent environments: User expectations, user experience and user role in building intelligent environments. Computers, 2(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers2010001
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, J. (2011). Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(2), 1–6. https://cjni.net/journal/?p=1444
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, M. K., & Agrawal, D. (2021). Influence of technology readiness in adoption of e-learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2014). Adoption of smart technology among older adults: Challenges and issues. Public Policy & Aging Report, 24(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prt005
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, L., & Briggs, P. (2005). Designing ambient intelligent scenarios to promote discussion of human values.
   Google Scholar
• Lundblad, J. P. (2003). A review and critique of Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organizations. Organization Development Journal, 21(4), 50. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/review-critique-rogers-diffusion-innovation/docview/197971687/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., Louw, T., Dziennus, M., Graindorge, T., Ortega, E., Graindorge, M., & Merat, N. (2016). Acceptance of automated road transport systems (arts): An adaptation of the UTAUT model. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2217–2226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.237
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D. F. (1999, January). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 1999, HICSS-32, Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers (p. 14). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, Y. (2015). Towards evaluating pervasive computing systems [Unpublished Ph.D. thesis]. University of Sherbrooke.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS Database, 32(3), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506730
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D. J., & Hamilton, D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minerva, R., Biru, A., & Rotondi, D. (2015). Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet Initiative, 1(1), 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., & Tscheligi, M. (2012, October). Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology acceptance model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 51–58).
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A. (2000). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E., Cho, Y., Han, J., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Comprehensive approaches to user acceptance of Internet of Things in a smart home environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 2342–2350. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek, S. T., Wouters, E. J., Van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE International (2018). SAE j3016b Standard: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016_201806
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25–38). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H. (2009). Ubiquitous city: Urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics. Journal of Information Science, 35(5), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509100832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H. (2010). Ubiquitous computing acceptance model: End user concern about security, privacy and risk. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 8(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2010.031446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuhaiber, A., & Mashal, I. (2019). Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes. Technology in Society, 58, 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiekermann, S. (2007). User control in ubiquitous computing: Design alternatives and user acceptance. Habilitation Humboldt Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/249443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1994.11518035
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahdain, E. A., & Ahmad, M. N. (2014). User acceptance of information technology: Factors, theories and applications. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 6(1), 17–25. http://seminar.utmspace.edu.my/jisri/
   Google Scholar
• Walldén, S., & Mäkinen, E. (2014). On accepting smart environments at user and societal levels. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0327-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Lee, W., & Lee, H. (2018). IoT smart home adoption: The importance of proper level automation. Journal of Sensors, 2018, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6464036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar