Impact of Direct Interaction with Virtual Objects through Touchscreens on Enhancing Psychological Ownership and Endowment Effect

References

• Asatryan, V. S., & Oh, H. (2008). Psychological ownership theory: An exploratory application in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348008317391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, L., & Burns, A,. (1998). A modified scale for the measurement of communication-evoked mental imagery. Psychology and Marketing, 15(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199805)15:3<261::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Befurt, R., & Silk, A. J. (2019). How purchase probability scales can shed light on consumer purchase intentions. Landslide: Advancing Intellectual Property Law, 12(1), 51–54. https://www.analysisgroup.com/globalassets/uploadedfiles/content/insights/publishing/2019-befurt-silk-how-purchase-probability-scales-shed-light-consumer-purchase.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bellemare, C., Bissonnette, L., & Kröger, S. (2014). Statistical power of within and between-subjects designs in economic experiments. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 8583, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-016-0028-4
   Google Scholar
• Bonnardel, V., Beniwal, S., Dubey, N., Pande, M., & Bimler, D. (2018). Gender difference in colour preference across cultures: An archetypal pattern modulated by a female cultural stereotype. Color Research & Application, 43(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., & Esslemont, D. (1994). The accuracy of the Juster Scale for predicting purchase rates of branded. Fast-Moving Consumer Goods, Marketing Bulletin, 5, 47–52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237411319_The_Accuracy_of_the_Juster_Scale_for_Predicting_Purchase_Rates_of_Branded_Fast-Moving_Consumer_Goods
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, L., Rottenstreich, Y., Sood, S., & Bilgin, B. (2007). On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1086/518545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bross, I. D. J. (1966). Spurious effects from an extraneous variable. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 19(6), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(66)90062-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/317590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/374701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., & O'Sullivan, C. (2005). Describing haptic phenomena. School of Computer Science. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/haptic/haptics%20web%20pages_files/Chang%20and%20Sullivan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvelin, C., Sagi, T., Coni, P., André, J.-M., Jauze, C., & Lespinet-Najib, V. (2014). Haptics on a touch screen: Characterization of perceptual thresholds. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(11), 872–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.941273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, K., & Taylor, C. (2014). How do 3-dimensional images promote products on the internet? Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2164–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citrin, A. V., Stem, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer need for tactile input: An internet retailing challenge. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00278-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Felton, W. M., & Jackson, R. E. (2022). Presence: A review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1921368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavilan, D., Avello, M., Manzano, R., & Abril, C. (2016). The influence of need for touch in multichannel purchasing behaviour: An approach based on its instrumental and autotelic dimensions and consumer’s shopping task. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media, 4, 48–68. https://doi.org/10.54663/2182-9306
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, T. (2014). Human haptic perception in virtual environments: An investigation of the interrelationship between physical stiffness and perceived roughness [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of York Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ger, G., & Belk, R. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(95)00035-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowtham, P. (2012). A hand gesture recognition based virtual touch wall. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2012.V2.79
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, A. (2015). Sense of touch in training tasks demanding high precision and short time of execution. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(12), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1067497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallock, J. (2003). Colour assignment [Undergraduate thesis]. University of Washington. http://www.joehallock.com/?page_id=1281
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modelling. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, S. (2005). Phenomenology and psychophysics. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-5852-6
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R., & Armstrong, J. S. (1992). Are null results becoming an endangered species in marketing? Marketing Papers, Retrieved May 7, from https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/110
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17(16), R623–5R625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iseki, S., & Kitagami, S. (2016). Mere touching imagery promotes purchase intention through increased psychological ownership. Journal of Human Environmental Studies, 14(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.4189/shes.14.49
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, K., Jang, S., Chae, J., Cho, G., & Salvendy, G. (2008). Use of decision support for clothing products on the web results in no difference in perception of tactile sensation than actually touching the material. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(8), 794–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802537574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juster, F. T. (1966). Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61(315), 658–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1966.10480897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamleitner, B., & Feuchtl, S. (2015). “As if it were mine”: Imagery works by inducing psychological ownership. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., Xu, S., & Zhang, N. (2015). Psychological ownership motivation and the use of social media. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Kim, J., Jeong, K., & Kim, C. (2020). Grasping VR: Presence of pseudo-haptic interface based portable hand grip system in immersive virtual reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(7), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1680920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Matula, D. E. (1991). Imagined haptic exploration in judgments of object properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, J., & Nayak, J. (2019). Exploring destination psychological ownership among tourists: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessard-Bonaventure, S., & Chebat, J.-C. (2015). Psychological ownership, touch, and willingness to pay for an extended warranty. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A., Levin, I., & Weller, J. (2005). A multi-attribute analysis of preferences for online and offline shopping: Differences across products, consumers, and shopping stages. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(4), 281–290. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228394095_A_multi-attribute_analysis_of_preferences_for_online_and_offline_shopping_Differences_across_products_consumers_and_shopping_stages
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Atkinson, L. (2020). The role of psychological ownership in consumer happiness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(6), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2019-3420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, W., Yang, H., Falk, C., Adam, H., Adair, W., Endo, Y., Carmon, Z., & Heine, S. (2010). For whom is parting with possessions more painful? Cultural differences in the endowment effect. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1910–1917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2003). The effect of examining products of product descriptions on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsuwé, T., Dellaert, B., & de Ruyter, K. (2004). What drives consumers to shop online? A literature Review. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230410523358
   Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, E. C. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: An integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 947–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moth, D. (2012). Security, screen size and form filling still barriers for m-commerce. Econsultancy. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://econsultancy.com/security-screen-size-and-form-filling-still-barriers-for-m-commerce/
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C., Richard, P., Yamaguchi, T., & Bahn, S. (2014). Does touch matter?: The effects of haptic visualization on human performance, behavior and perception. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(11), 839–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.941270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, S., Nagano, H., & Yamada, Y. (2013). Psychophysical dimensions of tactile perception of textures. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2012.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2009). Introduction: Re-mediating touch. The Senses and Society, 4(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunescu, A. (2020, February 5). GPeC 2019 Romanian E-Commerce Report: Over 4.3 billion euro revenue, a 20% growth compared to 2018. GPeC Blog. https://www.gpec.ro/blog/en/gpec-2019-romanian-e-commerce-report-2019
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, S. (2019, January 21). In 2018, Romanians have made online purchases worth more than 3,5 billion EUR, a 30% increase YoY|The 2018 GPeC Romanian eCommerce Market Report. GPeC Blog. https://www.gpec.ro/blog/en/in-2018-romanians-have-made-online-purchases-worth-more-than-35-billion-euros-2018-gpec-romanian-ecommerce-market-report
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., Barger, V., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003a). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “Need for Touch” scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1086/378619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003b). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 765–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological ownership and the organizational context: Theory, research evidence, and application. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934451
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/259124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu, A. (2020, February 3). Raport GPeC E-Commerce România 2019: Cumpărături online de peste 4,3 miliarde de euro, în creștere cu 20% față de 2018. GPeC Blog. https://www.gpec.ro/blog/raport-gpec-e-commerce-romania-2019
   Google Scholar
• Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107–114. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5140608_Possession_feelings_of_ownership_and_the_endowment_effect
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles-De-La-Torre, G. (2006). The importance of the sense of touch in virtual and real environments. IEEE Multimedia. 13(3), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2006.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, P., Raposo, A., & Soares, L. (2011). A virtual touch interaction device for immersive applications. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 10(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20870/IJVR.2011.10.4.2824
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, T., Silva, S. C., & Duarte, P. (2017). The value of textual haptic information in online clothing shopping. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2016-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scargle, J. (2000). Publication bias: The “file-drawer” problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 14(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9909033
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/376807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., Yucel, D., & Serdar, M. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica, 31(1), 010502. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H., Zhang, M., & Krishna, A. (2016). Computer interfaces and the “direct-touch” effect: Can iPads increase the choice of hedonic food? Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, S., & Peck, J. (2011). Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreelakshmi, M., & Subash, D. (2017). Haptic technology: A comprehensive review on its applications and future prospects. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(2, part B), 4182–4187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.120
   Google Scholar
• Stenslie, S. (2010). Virtual Touch: A study of the use and experience of touch in artistic. multimodal and computer-based environments [Doctoral dissertation]. Oslo School of Architecture and Design. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236344603_Virtual_Touch
   Google Scholar
• Ştir, M., & Zaiţ, A. (2019). Potential impact of virtual touching on endowment and feelings of ownership. A literature review of concepts and scales. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 12(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/rebs-2019-0097
   Google Scholar
• Tosas, M., & Li, B. (2004). Virtual touch screen for mixed reality. In N. Sebe, M. Lew & T. S. Huang (Eds.), Computer vision in human-computer interaction. CVHCI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3058). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24837-8_6
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, R., Jager, G., Tijssen, I., & Zandstra, E. H. (2018). Shopping for products in a virtual world: Why haptics and visuals are equally important in shaping consumer perceptions and attitudes. Food Quality and Preference, 66, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, R., & Molesworth, M. (2012). Attachment to digital virtual possessions in videogames. Research in Consumer Behaviour, 14, 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0885-2111(2012)0000014012
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, R. A., Parnell, K. J., Smith, M. A., Plant, K. L., & Stanton, N. A. (2021). Can’t touch this: Hammer time on touchscreen task performance variability under simulated turbulent flight conditions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(7), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1890492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshioka, T., Bensmaïa, S. J., Craig, J. C., & Hsiao, S. S. (2007). Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 1(2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220701318163
   Google Scholar