Exploration of the Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Coordination Dynamics on Team Effectiveness in Human-Machine Teams

References

• Abarbanel, H. (1996). Analysis of observed chaotic data (1st ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Perret, C., Likens, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). What’D you say again?: Recurrence quantification analysis as a method for analyzing the dynamics of discourse in a reading strategy tutor. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (pp. 373–382). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027445
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B., Beinhocker, E., & Stanger, A. (Eds.). (2020). Complexity economics: Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute’s 2019 fall symposium. SFI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C. E., & Cooke, N. J. (2015). Human-robot teaming in urban search and rescue. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591051
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, S. (2014, December 28). Add standardized regression coefficients to lm-objects [R package lm.beta version 1.5-1]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lm.beta
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, M. T., Prince, A., Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1995). The measurement of team process. Human Factors, 37(3), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, E. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 15(4), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butner, J. E., Berg, C. A., Baucom, B. R., & Wiebe, D. J. (2014). Modeling coordination in multiple simultaneous latent change scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(6), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.934321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333–380). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (1987). Interpersonal communication: Definitions and fundamental questions. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 184–238). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chanel, G., Bétrancourt, M., Pun, T., Cereghetti, D., & Molinari, G. (2013). Assessment of computer-supported collaborative processes using interpersonal physiological and eye-movement coupling. In Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (pp. 116–122). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.26
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, E. K., Demir, M., Buchanan, V., Corral, C. C., Endsley, M. R, Lematta, G. J., Cooke, N. J., & McNeese, N. J. (2022). Towards human–robot teaming: Tradeoffs of explanation-based communication strategies in a virtual search and rescue task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14, 1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00834-1
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2016). Cooperation in human-agent systems to support resilience: A microworld experiment. Human Factors, 58(6), 846–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816649094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2021). Trusting automation: Designing for responsivity and resilience. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009995
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (1st ed.). Academic Press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/statistical-power-analysis-for-the-behavioral-sciences/cohen/978-0-12-179060-8
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. C., Demir, M., Chiou, E. K., & Cooke, N. J. (2021, September 15). The dynamics of trust and verbal anthropomorphism in human-autonomy teaming. In 2nd IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS53169.2021.9582655
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., & Gorman, J. C. (2009). Interaction-based measures of cognitive systems. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 3(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534309X433302
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013). Interactive team cognition. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L. (2006). Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. Journal of Technology Studies, 32(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v32i1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2011). Nominal cross recurrence as a generalized lag sequential analysis for behavioral streams. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 21(04), 1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127411028970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, E. J., Peeters, M. M. M., Jung, M. F., Kohn, S., Shaw, T. H., Pak, R., & Neerincx, M. A. (2020). Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, M., Amazeen, P. G., & Cooke, N. J. (2020). Examining human-autonomy team interaction and explicable behavior in a dynamic LEGO construction task. Procedia Computer Science, 168, 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.270
   Google Scholar
• Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Amazeen, P. G. (2018). A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, M., Likens, A. D., Cooke, N. J., Amazeen, P. G., & McNeese, N. J. (2019). Team coordination and effectiveness in human-autonomy teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2877482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2017). Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming. Cognitive Systems Research, 46, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2018a). The impact of perceived autonomous agents on dynamic team behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2(4), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2018.2829985
   Google Scholar
• Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2018b). Dyadic team interaction and shared cognition to inform human-robot teaming. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 124–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621028
   Google Scholar
• Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2019). The evolution of human-autonomy teams in remotely piloted aircraft systems operations. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00050
   Google Scholar
• Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J. (2020). Understanding human-robot teams in light of all-human teams: Aspects of team interaction and shared cognition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 140, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., Myers, C. W., & Grimm, D. A. (2021). Exploration of team trust and interaction dynamics in human-autonomy teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(6), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3115058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckmann, J.-P., Kamphorst, S. O., & Ruelle, D. (1987). Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhysics Letters (EPL), 4(9), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/4/9/004
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M., & Jones, W. (2001). A model of inter- and intra-team situation awareness: Implications for design, training and measurement. In M. McNeese, E. Salas, & M. Endsley (Eds.), New trends in cooperative activities: Understanding system dynamics in complex environments (pp. 46–67). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., & Wiltshire, T. J. (2016). Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Price, B., Adler, D., Bates, D., Baud-Bovy, G., Bolker, B., Ellison, S., Firth, D., Friendly, M., Gorjanc, G., Graves, S., Heiberger, R., Krivitsky, P., Laboissiere, R., Maechler, M., Monette, G., Murdoch, D., … Nilsson, H. (2022). car: Companion to Applied Regression (3.0-13) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=car
   Google Scholar
• Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Investigating conversational dynamics: interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science, 40(1), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., Vanyukov, P., & Martin, M. K. (2005). The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J., Amazeen, P., & Cooke, N. (2010). Team coordination dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 14(3), 265–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., Amazeen, P. G., & Fouse, S. (2012). Measuring patterns in team interaction sequences using a discrete recurrence approach. Human Factors, 54(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811426140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Winner, J. L. (2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49(12–13), 1312–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600612788
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Grimm, D. A., Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T., Willemsen-Dunlap, A. M., & Halpin, D. J. (2020). Measuring real-time team cognition during team training. Human Factors, 62(5), 825–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819852791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Hessler, E. E., Amazeen, P. G., Cooke, N. J., & Shope, S. M. (2012). Dynamical analysis in real time: Detecting perturbations to team communication. Ergonomics, 55(8), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.679317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Martin, M. J., Dunbar, T. A., Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T. L., Amazeen, P. G., & Likens, A. D. (2016). Cross-level effects between neurophysiology and communication during team training. Human Factors, 58(1), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815602575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, D., Demir, M., Gorman, J. C., & Cooke, N. J. (2018). The complex dynamics of team situation awareness in human-autonomy teaming. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) (pp. 103–109). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423990
   Google Scholar
• Guastello, S. J. (2010). Nonlinear dynamics of team performance and adaptability in emergency response. Human Factors, 52(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809359003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastello, S. J., & Guastello, D. D. (1998). Origins of coordination and team effectiveness: A perspective from game theory and nonlinear dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastello, S. J., & Peressini, A. F. (2017). Development of a synchronization coefficient for biosocial interactions in groups and teams. Small Group Research, 48(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416675225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. B. (2000). Communication yearbook. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Mashkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). North Holland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornyak, T. (2020, March 18). What America can learn from China’s use of robots and telemedicine to combat the coronavirus. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/18/how-china-is-using-robots-and-telemedicine-to-combat-the-coronavirus.html
   Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. J., Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Wolff, A. T., & Cooke, N. J. (2021). The impact of training on human–autonomy team communications and trust calibration. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211047323
   Google Scholar
• Kantz, H., & Schreiber, T. (1997). Nonlinear time series analysis (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. F. (1983, December). An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 193–196). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/800045.801609
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, T., Baumgartner, M., & Kinkel, S. (2022). How linguistic framing affects factory workers’ initial trust in collaborative robots: The interplay between anthropomorphism and technological replacement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 158, 102730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lematta, G. J., Coleman, P. B., Bhatti, S. A., Chiou, E. K., McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., & Cooke, N. J. (2019). Developing human-robot team interdependence in a synthetic task environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 1503–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631433
   Google Scholar
• Likens, A. D., Amazeen, P. G., Stevens, R., Galloway, T., & Gorman, J. C. (2014). Neural signatures of team coordination are revealed by multifractal analysis. Social Neuroscience, 9(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.882861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., & Xu, C. (2020). Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives. Health Science Reports, 3(3), e178. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, P. (1993). Modeling adaptive autonomous agents. Artificial Life, 1(1_2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl.1993.1.1_2.135
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• mars.nasa.gov (n.d). Goals. Retrieved February 25, 2021, from https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/mission/science/goals/
   Google Scholar
• Marwan, N., Carmen Romano, M., Thiel, M., & Kurths, J. (2007). Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Physics Reports, 438(5–6), 237–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwan, N., & Webber, C. L. (2015). Mathematical and computational foundations of recurrence quantifications. In C. L. Webber, & N. Marwan (Eds.), Recurrence quantification analysis (pp. 3–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07155-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, J. E., Rupp, M. A., Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., Barber, D., & Procci, K. (2016). Intelligent agent transparency in human–agent teaming for multi-UxV management. Human Factors, 58(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815621206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A. (2021). Trust, transparency, explanation, and planning: Why we need a lifecycle perspective on human-automation interaction. In Trust in human-robot interaction (pp. 233–257). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819472-0.00011-3
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. R. (2019). Introduction to AI robotics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nalepka, P., Gregory-Dunsmore, J. p., Simpson, J., Patil, G., & Richardson, M. (2021, May 13). Interaction flexibility in artificial agents teaming with humans. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9ks6n70q
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022). Human–autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 64(5), 904–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open AI, Berner, C., Brockman, G., Chan, B., Cheung, V., Dębiak, P., Dennison, C., Farhi, D., Fischer, Q., Hashme, S., Hesse, C., Józefowicz, R., Gray, S., Olsson, C., Pachocki, J., Petrov, M., Pinto, H. P. D O., Raiman, J., Salimans, T., Zhang, S. … (2019). Dota 2 with large scale deep reinforcement learning. ArXiv191206680 [CsStat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06680
   Google Scholar
• Packard, N. H., Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., & Shaw, R. S. (1980). Geometry from a time series. Physical Review Letters, 45(9), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, R. V., Marraccini, M. E., Weyandt, L. L., Wilder-Smith, O., McGee, H. A., Liu, S., & Goodwin, M. S. (2017). Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 21(2), 99–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316628405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W. B. (1976). The coordinated management of meaning: A rules-based theory of interpersonal communication. In Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp.278–278). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pellerin, C. (2015). Work: Human-machine teaming represents defense technology future. U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/628154/work-human-machine-teaming-represents-defense-technology-future/
   Google Scholar
• Pena, E. (2019). Package ‘gvlma’: Global validation of linear models assumptions (1.0.0.3) [R Software]. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gvlma/gvlma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perone, S., & Simmering, V. R. (2017). Applications of dynamic systems theory to cognition and development: New frontiers. In J. B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 52, Chapter 2, pp 43–80). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2016, October 31). R: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics (Version 3.3.2). https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Marques-Quinteiro, P., Navarro, J., & Rico, R. (2018). Teams as complex adaptive systems: Reviewing 17 years of research. Small Group Research, 49(2), 135–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417713849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, B. (2021, May 3). Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley’s MASS [R package MASS version 73-54]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MASS
   Google Scholar
• Romero, M. E. (2020, April 8). Tommy the robot nurse helps Italian doctors care for COVID-19 patients. The World from PRX. https://www.pri.org/stories/2020-04-08/tommy-robot-nurse-helps-italian-doctors-care-covid-19-patients
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. M., Funke, G. J., Knott, B. A., & Strang, A. J. (2012). Recurrence quantification analysis used to assess team communication in simulated air battle management. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561046
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50(3), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Dynamics (pp. 281–308). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_14
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D., Spiegel, S., Marwan, N., & Albayrak, S. (2015). Approximation of diagonal line based measures in recurrence quantification analysis. Physics Letters A, 379(14–15), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J., & Breazeal, C. (2010). An empirical analysis of team coordination behaviors and action planning with application to human–robot teaming. Human Factors, 52(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809350882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)†. Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. P., & Perone, S. (2008). Defending qualitative change: The view from dynamical systems theory. Child Development, 79(6), 1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01214.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou, N. (2016). Nonlinear analysis for human movement variability. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stowers, K., Brady, L. L., MacLellan, C., Wohleber, R., & Salas, E. (2021). Improving teamwork competencies in human-machine teams: Perspectives from team science. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590290
   Google Scholar
• Strang, A. J., Funke, G. J., Russell, S. M., Dukes, A. W., & Middendorf, M. S. (2014). Physio-behavioral coupling in a cooperative team task: Contributors and relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Dynamic systems theories. In Handbook of child psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0106
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, S. (2005). Variable selection. In Applied linear regression (pp. 211–232). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471704091.ch10/summary
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, T. J., Butner, J. E., & Fiore, S. M. (2018). Problem-solving phase transitions during team collaboration. Cognitive Science, 42(1), 129–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, T. J., Philipsen, J. S., Trasmundi, S. B., Jensen, T. W., & Steffensen, S. V. (2020). Interpersonal coordination dynamics in psychotherapy: A systematic review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44(4), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10106-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar