415
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Facing a Trend of Icon Simplicity: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 945-955 | Received 23 Mar 2022, Accepted 06 Jan 2023, Published online: 06 Feb 2023

References

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Clarendon Press.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere.
  • Bigman, Z., & Pratt, H. (2004). Time course and nature of stimulus evaluation in category induction as revealed by visual event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 66(2), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.10.003
  • Bossel, V., Geyskens, K., & Goukens, C. (2019). Facing a trend of brand logo simplicity: The impact of brand logo design on consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.009
  • Cao, Y., Ding, Y., Deng, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019). Effects of mobile application icon complexity and border on college students’ cognition. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 273–279). Springer.
  • Cao, Y., Proctor, R. W., Ding, Y., Duffy, V. G., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). Influences of color salience and location of website links on user performance and affective experience with a mobile web directory. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(6), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1838188
  • Cao, Y., Proctor, R. W., Ding, Y., Duffy, V. G., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Is an anthropomorphic app icon more attractive than a non-anthropomorphic one? A case study using multimodal measurement. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 20(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2022.123789
  • Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., Ding, Y., Duffy, V. G., & Zhang, X. (2021). Is an anthropomorphic app icon more attractive? Evidence from neuroergonomomics. Applied Ergonomics, 97, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103545
  • Carretié, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Martín‐Loeches, M., Mercado, F., & Tapia, M. (2004). Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: Neural correlates. Human Brain Mapping, 22(4), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20037
  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007
  • Chen, R., Huang, J., & Zhou, J. (2020). Skeuomorphic or flat icons for an efficient visual search by younger and older adults? Applied Ergonomics, 85, 103073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103073
  • Clayson, P. E., Baldwin, S. A., & Larson, M. J. (2013). How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event‐related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study. Psychophysiology, 50(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12001
  • Collaud, R., Reppa, I., Défayes, L., McDougall, S., Henchoz, N., & Sonderegger, A. (2022). Design standards for icons: The independent role of aesthetics, visual complexity and concreteness in icon design and icon understanding. Displays, 74, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2022.102290
  • Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10010
  • Ding, Y., Guo, F., Hu, M., & Cao, Y. (2017). Using event related potentials to investigate visual aesthetic perception of product appearance. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 27(5), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20704
  • Eytam, E., Lowengart, O., & Tractinsky, N. (2021). Effects of visual simplicity in product design and individual differences in preference of interactive products. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00391-3
  • Foti, D., Hajcak, G., & Dien, J. (2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal‐spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46(3), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00796.x
  • Guo, F., Wang, X. S., Liu, W. L., & Ding, Y. (2018). Affective preference measurement of product appearance based on event-related potentials. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(2), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0463-5
  • Guo, F., Wang, X. S., Shao, H., Wang, X. R., & Liu, W. L. (2020). How user’s first impression forms on mobile user interface?: An ERPs study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(9), 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1699745
  • Han, L., Gao, F., Hou, X., Xie, D., Jou, M., & Huang, C. C. (2018). Do covered nude photographs in the internet induce sexual cognition–A study of event-related potential. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.039
  • He, Y., Ao, H., Chen, Y., Chen, X., & Bi, T. (2017). The use of smartphone application influence human visual attention. Advances in Psychology, 7(4), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2017.74064
  • Huffmeijer, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Alink, L. R. A., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2014). Reliability of event-related potentials: The influence of number of trials and electrodes. Physiology & Behavior, 130, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.008
  • Johnson, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. Sage.
  • Kanske, P., Plitschka, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Attentional orienting towards emotion: P2 and N400 ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 49(11), 3121–3129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.022
  • Kim, A. S., Kim, S. H., & Hamann, S. (2022). Neural and self-reported responses to antisocial news stories: Entertaining versus traditional news introduction. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106994
  • Langeslag, S. J., Jansma, B. M., Franken, I. H., & Van Strien, J. W. (2007). Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biological Psychology, 76(1–2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.007
  • Lazard, A. J., & King, A. J. (2020). Objective design to subjective evaluations: Connecting visual complexity to aesthetic and usability assessments of eHealth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1606976
  • Leppänen, J. M., Tenhunen, M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2003). Faster choice-reaction times to positive than to negative facial expressions: The role of cognitive and motor processes. Journal of Psychophysiology, 17(3), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.17.3.113
  • Li, M., Guo, F., Chen, J., & Duffy, V. (2022). Evaluating users’ auditory affective preference for humanoid robot voices through neural dynamics. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2108586
  • Lin, H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Wu, F. G. (2016). A study on the relationships between different presentation modes of graphical icons and users’ attention. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.008
  • Liu, W., Liang, X., Wang, X., & Guo, F. (2019). The evaluation of emotional experience on webpages: An event-related potential study. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0507-x
  • Liu, W., Cao, Y., & Proctor, R. W. (2022). The roles of visual complexity and order in first impressions of webpages: An ERP study of webpage rapid evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(14), 1345–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2002044
  • Liu, W., Cao, Y., & Proctor, R. W. (2021). How do app icon color and border shape influence visual search efficiency and user experience? Evidence from an eye-tracking study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 84, 103160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103160
  • Locke, H. S., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Motivational influences on cognitive control: Behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.8.1.99
  • Lu, G., & Hou, G. (2020). Effects of semantic congruence on sign Identification: An ERP study. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62(5), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819854880
  • Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press.
  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x
  • Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x
  • McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211(4477), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7444452
  • McDougall, S., Reppa, I., Kulik, J., & Taylor, A. (2016). What makes icons appealing? The role of processing fluency in predicting icon appeal in different task contexts. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.006
  • McDougall, S. J. P., Curry, M. B., & de Bruijn, O. (1999). Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: Norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 487–519. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200730
  • Mu, D., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Li, J., & Kang, Z. (2022). Neumorphic or flat? Impact of icon depth on user attention and visual search efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 89, 103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103281
  • Näätänen, R. (2018). Attention and brain function. Routledge.
  • Niu, Y. F., Shi, B. Z., Qiu, L. C., Li, B., Shen, Q. Y., & Xue, C. Q. (2019). Research on binding memory of icon features based on event-related potential. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1215(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1215/1/012027
  • Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006
  • Page, T. (2014). Skeuomorphism or flat design: Future directions in mobile device user interface (UI) design education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.062350
  • Pastor, M. C., Bradley, M. M., Löw, A., Versace, F., Moltó, J., & Lang, P. J. (2008). Affective picture perception: Emotion, context, and the late positive potential. Brain Research, 1189, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.072
  • Perri, R. L., Berchicci, M., Bianco, V., Quinzi, F., Spinelli, D., & Di Russo, F. (2019). Perceptual load in decision making: The role of anterior insula and visual areas. An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 129, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.009
  • Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghöfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9
  • Shahid, S., ter Voort, J., Somers, M., & Mansour, I. (2016). Skeuomorphic, flat or material design: Requirements for designing mobile planning applications for students with autism spectrum disorder. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (pp. 738–745).
  • Shigeto, H., Ishiguro, J., & Nittono, H. (2011). Effects of visual stimulus complexity on event-related brain potentials and viewing duration in a free-viewing task. Neuroscience Letters, 497(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.035
  • Smith, N. K., Cacioppo, J. T., Larsen, J. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00147-1
  • Spiliotopoulos, K., Rigou, M., & Sirmakessis, S. (2018). A comparative study of skeuomorphic and flat design from a UX perspective. Multimodal Technologies Interaction Studies, 2(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020031
  • Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40(2), 201–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000104
  • Wang, X., Guo, F., & Li, M. (2022). Research on the neural mechanism of subconscious evaluation of mobile interfaces in smart apps. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2156532
  • Wang, X., Huang, Y., Ma, Q., & Li, N. (2012). Event-related potential P2 correlates of implicit aesthetic experience. Neuroreport, 23(14), 862–866. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283587161
  • Wild-Wall, N., Willemssen, R., & Falkenstein, M. (2009). Feedback-related processes during a time-production task in young and older adults. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(2), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.007
  • Wu, L., Lei, T., Li, J., & Li, B. (2015). Skeuomorphism and flat design: Evaluating users’ emotion experience in car navigation interface design. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 567–575).
  • Yamaguchi, M., Chen, J., Mishler, S., & Proctor, R. W. (2018). Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: Does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses? Cognition & Emotion, 32(5), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1381073
  • Yao, D., Wang, L., Oostenveld, R., Nielsen, K. D., Arendt-Nielsen, L., & Chen, A. C. (2005). A comparative study of different references for EEG spectral mapping: The issue of the neutral reference and the use of the infinity reference. Physiological Measurement, 26(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/26/3/003
  • Yeh, Y. Y., Lee, D. S., & Ko, Y. H. (2013). Color combination and exposure time on legibility and EEG response of icon presented on visual display terminal. Displays, 34(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2012.11.007
  • Zhang, X. M., Wang, Q., & Shi, Y. (2017). Contrastive analysis on emotional cognition of skeuomorphic and flat icon. In P. Zhao, Y. Ouyang, M. Xu, L. Yang, & Y. Ouyang (Eds.), Advanced graphic communications and media technologies (Vol. 417, pp. 225–232). Springer-Verlag Singapore Pte Ltd.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.