CubeMuseum AR: A Tangible Augmented Reality Interface for Cultural Heritage Learning and Museum Gifting

References

• Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, B., Sicat, R., Beyer, J., Cordeil, M., & Pfister, H. (2018). The hologram in my hand: How effective is interactive exploration of 3d visualizations in immersive tangible augmented reality? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(1), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, B., Sicat, R., Pfister, H., & Quigley, A. J. (2017). Drawing into the ar-canvas: Designing embedded visualizations for augmented reality. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Back, J., Bedwell, B., Benford, S., Eklund, L., Sundnes Løvlie, A., Preston, W., Rajkowska, P., Ryding, K., Spence, J., Thorn, E.-C., Waern, A.,… Wray, T. (2018). Gift: Hybrid museum experiences through gifting and play. In Workshop on Cultural Informatics Co-Located with the Euromed International Conference on Digital Heritage 2018 (Euromed 2018), Nicosia, Cyprus, November 3, 2018 (Vol. 2235, pp. 31–40). CEUR-WS.
   Google Scholar
• Bekele, M. K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E. S., & Gain, J. (2018). A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 11(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3145534
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B., & Rodden, T. (2009). From interaction to trajectories: Designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 709–718).
   Google Scholar
• Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). MagicBook: Transitioning between reality and virtuality. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 25–26).
   Google Scholar
• Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2008). Tangible augmented reality [Paper presentation]. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 Courses, SIGGRAPH Asia’08, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1145/1508044.1508051
   Google Scholar
• Blumenstein, K. (2018). Interweaving physical artifacts with visualization on digital media in museums [Paper presentation]. ISS 2018 - Companion Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3280295.3280297
   Google Scholar
• Cesário, V. (2019). Guidelines for combining storytelling and gamification: Which features would teenagers desire to have a more enjoyable museum experience? In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 1–6). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, K., & Li, Y. (2022). Cultural heritage assets optimization workflow for interactive system development. In Proceedings - 2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2022 (pp. 1822–1827). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, A., Gross, R., McIntee, S., Hong, K. W., Lee, J., & Amant, R. (2014). Captive: A cube with augmented physical tools. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Liang, H. N., Lu, F., Papangelis, K., Man, K. L., & Yue, Y. (2020). Collaborative behavior, performance and engagement with visual analytics tasks using mobile devices. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-020-00253-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 75–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Where the Action is the Foundations of Embodied Interaction, 36(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, S. (2012). Materiality matters: Experiencing the displayed object. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, R., Zavgorodniaia, A., & Sorva, J. (2022). Cognitive load theory in computing education research: A review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 22(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3483843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. A., & MacLean, G. R. (2012). To use or not to use: Psychometric properties of the willingness to use technology (wut) instrument in three asian contexts. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1360–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. (2016). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, X., Zhu, Y., Xiao, Z., Xu, Y., & Ma, X. (2020). RestoreVR: Generating embodied knowledge and situated experience of Dunhuang mural conservation via interactive virtual reality. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 1–13). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlander, G. B. (2009). Fictional press releases and fake artifacts: How the Smithsonian American art museum is letting game players redefine the rules. In Museums and the Web 2009. Archives & Museum Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Havrez, C., Lepreux, S., Lebrun, Y., Haudegond, S., Ethuin, P., & Kolski, C. (2016). A design model for tangible interaction: Case study in waste sorting. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(19), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.594
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, T. Z., & Atencio, D. J. (2007). Integration of play, learning, and experience: What museums afford young visitors. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0208-1
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S. (2013). The role of cultural forms in tangible interaction design [Paper presentation]. TEI 2013 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 117–124). https://doi.org/10.1145/2460625.2460643
   Google Scholar
• Koleva, B., Spence, J., Benford, S., Kwon, H., Schnädelbach, H., Thorn, E., Preston, W., Hazzard, A., Greenhalgh, C., Adams, M., Farr, J. R., Tandavanitj, N., Angus, A., & Lane, G. (2020). Designing Hybrid Gifts. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(5), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3398193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoska, G., Fezzi, D., Valeri, B., Casati, F., Caliari, S., Tarter, S., & Baez, M. (2013). Collecting memories of the museum experience [Paper presentation]. CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France (pp. 247–252). https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468401
   Google Scholar
• Kruszyński, K. J., & van Liere, R. (2009). Tangible props for scientific visualization: Concept, requirements, application. Virtual Reality, 13(4), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-009-0126-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Van Der Spek, E. D., Hu, J., & Feijs, L. (2019). Turning your book into a game: Improving motivation through tangible interaction and diegetic feedback in an AR mathematics game for children. In CHI PLAY 2019 - Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(October) (pp. 73–85). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Ch’ng, E. (2022). A framework for sharing cultural heritage objects in hybrid virtual and augmented reality environments. In Visual heritage: Digital approaches in heritage science (pp. 471–492). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Ch’ng, E., Cai, S., & See, S. (2018). Multiuser interaction with hybrid VR and AR for cultural heritage objects. In Digital heritage 2018. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Ch’ng, E., Cobb, S., & See, S. (2022). Presence and communication in hybrid virtual and augmented reality environments. In PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality (pp. 29–52). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00340
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Tennent, P., & Cobb, S. (2019). Appropriate control methods for mobile virtual exhibitions. In M. Duguleană, M. Carrozzino, M. Gams, & I. Tanea (Eds.), VR technologies in cultural heritage (pp. 165–183). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Yu, L., & Liang, H.-N. (2021). Cubemuseum: An augmented reality prototype of embodied virtual museum. In ISMAR 2021: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J. (2020). Utilizing gamification and visualization in designing labs for teaching algorithms [Paper presentation]. SIGCSE ’20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland, OR, USA (pp. 1385).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Lin, Y., Shi, R., Luo, Y., & Liang, H.-N. (2021). RelicVR: A virtual reality game for active exploration of archaeological relics. In Extended abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 326–332). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483507
   Google Scholar
• Lu, F., Nanjappan, V., Parsons, P., Yu, L., & Liang, H. N. (2022). Effect of display platforms on spatial knowledge acquisition and engagement: An evaluation with 3D geometry visualizations. Journal of Visualization, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-022-00889-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, L., & Fryazinov, O. (2019). 3D printing for mixed reality hands-on museum exhibit interaction. In ACM siggraph 2019 posters. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. T., Dulake, N., Ciolfi, L., Duranti, D., Kockelkorn, H., & Petrelli, D. (2016). Using tangible smart replicas as controls for an interactive museum exhibition. In Proceedings of the Tei ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 159–167). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Meis, J., Kremers, S., & Bouman, M. (2012). Television viewing does not have to be sedentary: Motivation to participate in a TV exercise program. Journal of Obesity, 2012, 914–921. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/752820
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, K. A., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Contemporary Sociology, 17(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2070638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na Ayudhya, W. S., & Vavoula, G. (2017). Mobile family learning in the science museum. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, H., & Nichols, S. (2001). Theme-based content analysis: A flexible method for virtual environment evaluation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 55(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, S., Chinthammit, W., Lueg, C., & Nixon, P. (2011). Natural interactions between augmented virtual objects. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 229–232). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, S., Chinthammit, W., Lueg, C., & Nixon, P. (2014). Facilitating learning through hands-on engagement with virtual museum artefacts. In Proceedings of the 28th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Sand, Sea and Sky - Holiday HCI, HCI 2014 (pp. 222–227). BCS.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., & Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112(December 2017), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2013). Examining the generalizability of the user engagement scale (ues) in exploratory search. Information Processing & Management, 49(5), 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K., Kindberg, T., Glancy, M., Baptista, L., Sukumaran, B., Kahana, G., & Rowbotham, J. (2007). Collecting and sharing location-based content on mobile phones in a zoo visitor experience. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16(1–2), 11–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9039-2
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, C., & Fraser, D. (2004). Literature review in learning with tangible technologies. NESTA Futurelab.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, M. K., Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2011). Engaging visitors in museums with technology: Scales for the measurement of visitor and multimedia guide experience. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-computer interaction – interact 2011 (pp. 92–99). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, M. K., Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2013). Measuring the usability of a smartphone delivered museum guide. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.282
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E. W., & Hornbaek, K. (2011). Tangible bots: Interaction with active tangibles in tabletop interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2975–2984). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Petrelli, D., & O’Brien, S. (2018). Phone vs. tangible in museums: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–12). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ridel, B., Reuter, P., Laviole, J., Mellado, N., Couture, N., & Granier, X. (2014). The revealing flashlight: Interactive spatial augmented reality for detail exploration of cultural heritage artifacts. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 7(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611376
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, S., Estévez, I., Piñeiro, I., Valle, A., Vieites, T., & Regueiro, B. (2021). Perceived competence and intrinsic motivation in mathematics: Exploring latent profiles. Sustainability, 13(16), 8707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M. (2006). Intrinsic motivation inventory (IMI). https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2018). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 13(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
   Google Scholar
• Short, D. B. (2015). Use of 3d printing by museums: Educational exhibits, artifact education, and artifact restoration. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2(4), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0030
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipina, D., & Cardoso, J. C. S. (2022). Spectare: Re-designing a stereoscope for a cultural heritage xr experience. Electronics, 11(4), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tost, L. P., & Champion, E. M. (2007). A critical examination of presence applied to cultural heritage. In The 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence (pp. 245–256). ISPR Presence.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. A., Thomas, B. H. (2011). Visualising environmental corrosion in outdoor augmented reality. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian User Interface Conference - volume 117 (pp. 39–46). Australian Computer Society, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Chen, L., & Solheim, I. (2020). Modeling dyslexic students’ motivation for enhanced learning in E-learning systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 10(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in software engineering. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski, R., Walczak, K., White, M., & Cellary, W. (2004). Building virtual and augmented reality museum exhibitions. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on 3d Web Technology (p. 135–144). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. J., & Tai, Y. N. (2016). Effects of multimedia information technology integrated multi-sensory instruction on students’ learning motivation and outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1552a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, N., Li, Y., Lin, J., Yu, L., & Liang, H.-N. (2022). User retention of mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage learning. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) (pp. 447–452). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00095
   Google Scholar
• Zaharias, P. (2006). A usability evaluation method for e-learning: Focus on motivation to learn. In Chi ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1571–1576). ACM.
   Google Scholar