Would You Like to Listen to My Music, My Friend? An Experiment on AI Musicians

References

• Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Schepers, J., & Flavián, C. (2021). Examining the effects of robots’ physical appearance, warmth, and competence in frontline services: The humanness‐value‐loyalty model. Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2357–2376. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Lowry, P. B., Humpherys, S. L., Moody, G. D., Gaskin, J. E., & Giboney, J. S. (2016). Application of expectancy violations theory to communication with and judgments about embodied agents during a decision-making task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 91(July), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task-dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W., Gilbert, J. E., & Ross, K. (2019). Should AI-Based, conversational digital assistants employ social- or task-oriented interaction style? A task-competency and reciprocity perspective for older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 90(January), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.048
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Cohen, J., & Mou, J. (2022). Human vs. AI: Understanding the impact of anthropomorphism on consumer response to chatbots from the perspective of trust and relationship norms. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/249676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2003). A permutation procedure for multi-group comparison of PLS models [Paper presentation]. PLS and Related Methods: Proceedings of the PLS’03 International Symposium (pp. 33–43).
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Mattila, A. S., & Bolton, L. E. (2021). To err is human(-oid): How do consumers react to robot service failure and recovery? Journal of Service Research, 24(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520978798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Can machines create art? Philosophy & Technology, 30(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0231-5
   Google Scholar
• Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2022). Blame the bot: Anthropomorphism and anger in customer–chatbot interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211045687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, A., Chakravarti, D., & Biehal, G. (1990). Memory-based inferences during consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1086/208539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelidis, I., & Van Osselaer, S. M. (2018). Points of (dis)parity: Expectation disconfirmation from common attributes in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619–619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PlS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. W., Peng, Q., Williams, D., Ørmen, J., Helles, R., & Jensen, K. B. (2021). Are you ready for artificial Mozart and Skrillex? An experiment testing expectancy violation theory and AI music. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1920–1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. W., Fischer, K., Ha, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Human, I wrote a song for you: An experiment testing the influence of machines’ attributes on the AI-composed music evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 131(June), 107239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107239
   Google Scholar
• iiMedia Research. (2022). 2022-2023 China virtual human industry in-depth research and investment value analysis report. https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/86015.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. V., & Youn, S. (2022). Social presence and imagery processing as predictors of chatbot continuance intention in human-AI-interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2129277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., Schmitt, B. H., & Thalmann, N. M. (2019). Eliza in the uncanny valley: Anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09485-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadleo. (2022). White book of China virtual human development industry in 2022. https://www.leadleo.com/report/details?id=6267512d635d9d4f6bea3524.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2017). Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103(July), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & Li, Y. (2022). Teddy-bear effect in service recovery. Annals of Tourism Research, 94(May), 103400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103400
   Google Scholar
• Maar, D., Besson, E., & Kefi, H. (2022). Fostering positive customer attitudes and usage intentions for scheduling services via chatbots. Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2021-0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meusburger, P. (2009). Milieus of creativity: The role of places, environments, and spatial contexts. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Milieus of creativity (pp. 97–153). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, F., Kozlenkova, I. V., Wang, H., Xie, T., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). An emerging theory of avatar marketing. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921996646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online environments: A principal-agent. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). Media equation: How people treat computer, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least square (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Advances in International Marketing, 22, 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. (2013). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiau, W., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet Research, 29(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2018-0447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2022). Uncanny valley effects on chatbot trust, purchase intention, and adoption intention in the context of e-commerce: The moderating role of avatar familiarity. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2121038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Luximon, A., & Luximon, Y. (2021). The effect of facial features on facial anthropomorphic trustworthiness in social robots. Applied Ergonomics, 94(July), 103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103420
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stal, S., Tabak, M., Op Den Akker, H., Beinema, T., & Hermens, H. (2020). Who do you prefer? The effect of age, gender and role on users’ first impressions of embodied conversational agents in ehealth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(9), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1699744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigre Moura, F., & Maw, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence became Beethoven: How do listeners and music professionals perceive artificially composed music? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2020-3671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubadji, A., Huang, H., & Webber, D. J. (2021). Cultural proximity bias in AI-acceptability: The importance of being human. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(December), 121100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121100
   Google Scholar
• Tung, F. W. (2016). Child perception of humanoid robot appearance and behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(6), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1172808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017). Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking—not feeling—jobs. Emotion, 14(2), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Chen, K., & Guo, X. (2020). Online anthropomorphism and consumers’ privacy concern: Moderating roles of need for interaction and social exclusion. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V., Kunz, W. H., & Toporowski, W. (2021). Check-in at the Robo-desk: Effects of automated social presence on social cognition and service implications. Tourism Management, 85(August), 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104309
   Google Scholar
• Yogeeswaran, K., Złotowski, J., Livingstone, M., Bartneck, C., Sumioka, H., & Ishiguro, H. (2016). The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(2), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Yogeeswaran
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Kim, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953–972. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar