342
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The Impact of Heterogeneity in Consumers’ Socio-Demographic Characteristics on the Acceptance of Ambient Assisted Living Technology for Older Adults Monitoring in the Home Context

, , &
Pages 3699-3716 | Received 18 Oct 2022, Accepted 27 Mar 2023, Published online: 10 Apr 2023

References

  • ABI Research. (2019). Leveraging smart home to drive connected elderly care. https://www.abiresearch.com/market-research/product/1032665-leveraging-smart-home-to-drive-connected-e/
  • Agrawal, S. (2012). Effect of living arrangement on the health status of elderly in India: Findings from a national cross sectional survey. Asian Population Studies, 8(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2012.646842
  • Alraja, M. (2022). Frontline healthcare providers’ behavioural intention to Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled healthcare applications: A gender-based, cross-generational study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121256
  • Arthanat, S., Chang, H., & Wilcox, J. (2020). Determinants of information communication and smart home automation technology adoption for aging-in-place. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 14(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-11-2019-0050
  • Attié, E., & Meyer-Waarden, L. (2022). The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: An enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121485
  • Bae, Y., & Chang, H. (2012). Adoption of smart TVs: A Bayesian network approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(6), 891–910. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211238509
  • Balta-Ozkan, N., Davidson, R., Bicket, M., & Whitmarsh, L. (2013). Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. Energy Policy, 63, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.043
  • Baudier, P., Ammi, C., & Deboeuf-Rouchon, M. (2020). Smart home: Highly-educated students’ acceptance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.043
  • Blackman, S., Matlo, C., Bobrovitskiy, C., Waldoch, A., Fang, M. L., Jackson, P., Mihailidis, A., Nygård, L., Astell, A., & Sixsmith, A. (2016). Ambient assisted living technologies for aging well: A scoping review. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2014-0136
  • Bloomberg, M., Dugravot, A., Landré, B., Britton, A., Steptoe, A., Singh-Manoux, A., & Sabia, S. (2021). Sex differences in functional limitations and the role of socioeconomic factors: A multi-cohort analysis. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(12), e780–e790. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00249-X
  • Bongaarts, J., & Zimmer, Z. (2002). Living arrangements of older adults in the developing world: An analysis of Demographic and Health Survey household surveys. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(3), S145–S157. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.S145
  • Bowes, A., Dawson, A., & Bell, D. (2012). Ethical implications of lifestyle monitoring data in ageing research. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.530673
  • Cardinaux, F., Bhowmik, D., Abhayaratne, C., & Hawley, M. S. (2011). Video based technology for ambient assisted living: A review of the literature. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 3(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-2011-0110
  • Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
  • Cheng, Y. M. (2015). Towards an understanding of the factors affecting m-learning acceptance: Roles of technological characteristics and compatibility. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(3), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2014.12.011
  • Cheng, Z. (2021). Education and consumption: Evidence from migrants in Chinese cities. Journal of Business Research, 127, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.018
  • Cicirelli, G., Marani, R., Petitti, A., Milella, A., & D'Orazio, T. (2021). Ambient assisted living: A review of technologies, methodologies and future perspectives for healthy aging of population. Sensors, 21(10), 3549. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103549
  • Cimperman, M., Brenčič, M. M., & Trkman, P. (2016). Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—Applying an Extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002
  • Courtin, E., & Avendano, M. (2016). Under one roof: The effect of co-residing with adult children on depression in later life. Social Science & Medicine, 168, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.020
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Dobre, C., Mavromoustakis, C. X., Garcia, N. M., Mastorakis, G., & Goleva, R. I. (2017). Introduction to the AAL and ELE systems. In Ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments (pp. 1–16). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805195-5.00001-6
  • Dreyer, K., Steventon, A., Fisher, R., & Deeny, S. R. (2018). The association between living alone and health care utilisation in older adults: A retrospective cohort study of electronic health records from a London general practice. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0939-4
  • Duarte, P. A. O., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2010). A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the mobile phone market. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 449–485). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-821
  • Ehrenhard, M., Kijl, B., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2014). Market adoption barriers of multi-stakeholder technology: Smart homes for the aging population. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.002
  • Feng, Z., Falkingham, J., Liu, X., & Vlachantoni, A. (2017). Changes in living arrangements and mortality among older people in China. SSM - Population Health, 3, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.11.009
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • George, D. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e. Pearson Education India.
  • Goad, D., Collins, A. T., & Gal, U. (2021). Privacy and the Internet of Things – An experiment in discrete choice. Information & Management, 58(2), 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103292
  • Goodman-Casanova, J. M., Dura-Perez, E., Guzman-Parra, J., Cuesta-Vargas, A., & Mayoral-Cleries, F. (2020). Telehealth home support during COVID-19 confinement for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia: Survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e19434. https://doi.org/10.2196/19434
  • Guo, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, Y. (2016). The privacy–personalization paradox in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.11.001
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  • Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  • Heek, J. V., Himmel, S., & Ziefle, M. (2017). Privacy, data security, and the acceptance of AAL-systems–A user-specific perspective. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (pp. 38–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_4
  • Heek, J. V., Schomakers, E. M., & Ziefle, M. (2019). Bare necessities? How the need for care modulates the acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 127, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.025
  • Heinz, M., Martin, P., Margrett, J. A., Yearns, M., Franke, W., Yang, H.-I., Wong, J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). Perceptions of technology among older adults. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 39(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20121204-04
  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  • Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
  • Huang, Y., Qian, L., Tyfield, D., & Soopramanien, D. (2021). On the heterogeneity in consumer preferences for electric vehicles across generations and cities in china. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167(3), 120687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120687
  • Hubert, M., Blut, M., Brock, C., Zhang, R. W., Koch, V., & Riedl, R. (2019). The influence of acceptance and adoption drivers on smart home usage. European Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0794
  • Huffman, A. H., Whetten, J., & Huffman, W. H. (2013). Using technology in higher education: The influence of gender roles on technology self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1779–1786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.012
  • Iancu, I., & Iancu, B. (2020). Designing mobile technology for elderly. A theoretical overview. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119977
  • IBM. (2019). From Roadblock to Scale: The global sprint towards AI. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/think/2020/01/ai-in-2020-from-experimentation-to-adoption/
  • Inzitari, M., Risco, E., Cesari, M., Buurman, B. M., Kuluski, K., Davey, V., Bennett, L., Varela, J., & Prvu Bettger, J. (2020). Nursing homes and long term care after COVID-19: A new ERA? The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 24(10), 1042–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1447-8
  • Itoh, S., Miwa, H., Wu, V. X., Okuyama, A., Watanabe, K., Ikeuchi, T., & Wakui, T. (2021). Acceptance of care technologies to support activities of daily living by middle-aged and older adults in Japan: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 3, 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100042
  • Jacob Rodrigues, M., Postolache, O., & Cercas, F. (2020). Physiological and behavior monitoring systems for smart healthcare environments: A review. Sensors, 20(8), 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082186
  • Ji, W., & Chan, E. H. (2020). Between users, functions, and evaluations: Exploring the social acceptance of smart energy homes in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101637
  • Karahoca, A., Karahoca, D., & Aksöz, M. (2018). Examining intention to adopt to internet of things in healthcare technology products. Kybernetes, 47(4), 742–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2017-0045
  • Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
  • Kim, T. B., & Ho, C. T. B. (2021). Validating the moderating role of age in multi-perspective acceptance model of wearable healthcare technology. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101603
  • Kingston, A., Comas-Herrera, A., & Jagger, C. (2018). Forecasting the care needs of the older population in England over the next 20 years: Estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) modelling study. The Lancet Public Health, 3(9), e447–e455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30118-X
  • Le Deist, F., & Latouille, M. (2016). Acceptability conditions for telemonitoring gerontechnology in the elderly: Optimising the development and use of this new technology. IRBM, 37(5–6), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2015.12.002
  • Leitner, G., Mitrea, O., Fercher, A. J. (2013). Towards an acceptance model for AAL. In Human Factors in Computing and Informatics: First International Conference, SouthCHI 2013, Maribor, Slovenia, July 1-3, 2013. Proceedings (pp. 672–679). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_48
  • Li, H., Zhang, J., & Sarathy, R. (2010). Understanding compliance with internet use policy from the perspective of rational choice theory. Decision Support Systems, 48(4), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.005
  • Li, J., Ma, Q., Chan, A. H., & Man, S. (2019). Health monitoring through wearable technologies for older adults: Smart wearables acceptance model. Applied Ergonomics, 75, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.10.006
  • Lin, T. C., Wu, S., Hsu, J. S. C., & Chou, Y. C. (2012). The integration of value-based adoption and expectation–confirmation models: An example of IPTV continuance intention. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.04.004
  • Ling, S., Ma, S., & Jia, N. (2022). Sustainable urban transportation development in China: A behavioral perspective. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-021-0162-4
  • Liu, K., & Tao, D. (2022). The roles of trust, personalization, loss of privacy, and anthropomorphism in public acceptance of smart healthcare services. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107026
  • Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L. J., Shankar, K., & Connelly, K. H. (2011). Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework. Ageing International, 36(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9083-y
  • Ma, Q., Chan, A. H., & Teh, P. L. (2021). Insights into older adults’ technology acceptance through meta-analysis. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(11), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1865005
  • Majumder, S., Aghayi, E., Noferesti, M., Memarzadeh-Tehran, H., Mondal, T., Pang, Z., & Deen, M. J. (2017). Smart homes for elderly healthcare—Recent advances and research challenges. Sensors, 17(11), 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112496
  • Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019). A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015
  • Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2021). “Smart home sweet smart home”: An examination of smart home acceptance. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 17(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEBR.2021040101
  • Mashal, I., Shuhaiber, A., & Daoud, M. (2020). Factors influencing the acceptance of smart homes in Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, 11(2), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2020.106842
  • Maskeliūnas, R., Damaševičius, R., & Segal, S. (2019). A review of internet of things technologies for ambient assisted living environments. Future Internet, 11(12), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11120259
  • McLaughlin, S., McDaniel, P., Aiello, W. (2011). Protecting consumer privacy from electric load monitoring [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 87–98). https://doi.org/10.1145/2046707.2046720
  • Miltgen, C. L., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010
  • Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  • Mshali, H., Lemlouma, T., Moloney, M., & Magoni, D. (2018). A survey on health monitoring systems for health smart homes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 66, 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.02.002
  • Nadeem, W., Tan, T. M., Tajvidi, M., & Hajli, N. (2021). How do experiences enhance brand relationship performance and value co-creation in social commerce? The role of consumer engagement and self brand-connection. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120952
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). The main data of the seventh national census. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202105/t20210510_1817176.html
  • Nikou, S. (2019). Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: An empirical assessment. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101283
  • Oderanti, F. O., Li, F., Cubric, M., & Shi, X. (2021). Business models for sustainable commercialisation of digital healthcare (eHealth) innovations for an increasingly ageing population. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120969
  • Offermann, J., Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2023). Interplay of perceptions of aging, care, and technology acceptance in older age. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(5), 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050542
  • Pal, D., Zhang, X., & Siyal, S. (2021). Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach. Technology in Society, 66, 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101683
  • Park, E., Kim, S., Kim, Y., & Kwon, S. J. (2018). Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: Determinants of the adoption of smart home services. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0533-0
  • Patel, A., & Shah, J. (2022). Towards enhancing the health standards of elderly: Role of ambient sensors and user perspective. International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 13(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESMS.2022.122739
  • Peek, S. T., Wouters, E. J., Van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
  • Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003
  • Rahman, N., Daim, T., & Basoglu, N. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing big data technology acceptance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(5), 1738–1753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3066153
  • Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449
  • Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp.432–448). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887011
  • Ruggles, S. (2007). The decline of intergenerational co-residence in the United States, 1850 to 2000. American Sociological Review, 72(6), 964–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200606
  • Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Valléry, G. (2020). User acceptance of virtual reality: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
  • Sanguinetti, A., Dombrovski, K., & Sikand, S. (2018). Information, timing, and display: A design-behavior framework for improving the effectiveness of eco-feedback. Energy Research & Social Science, 39, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.001
  • Sannier, M., Janaqi, S., Raducanu, V., Barysheva, V., Haddou, H. A., Pla, S., Dray, G., & Bardy, B. G. (2022). Extracting walking trajectories at home from a capacitive proximity sensing floor. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(4), 3695–3703. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3139442
  • Schmitz, A., Díaz-Martín, A. M., & Guillén, M. J. Y. (2022). Modifying UTAUT2 for a cross-country comparison of telemedicine adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107183
  • Schomakers, E. M., Biermann, H., & Ziefle, M. (2021). Users’ preferences for smart home automation–Investigating aspects of privacy and trust. Telematics and Informatics, 64, 101689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101689
  • Schomakers, E. M., Lidynia, C., & Ziefle, M. (2022). The role of privacy in the acceptance of smart technologies: Applying the privacy calculus to technology acceptance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(13), 1276–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1994211
  • Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Guo, Y. (2019). Antecedents of trust and continuance intention in mobile payment platforms: The moderating effect of gender. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 33, 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.100823
  • Shi, Q., Liu, C., & Xiao, C. (2022). Machine learning in building energy management: A critical review and future directions. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-021-0181-1
  • Shin, J., Park, Y., & Lee, D. (2018). Who will be smart home users? An analysis of adoption and diffusion of smart homes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.029
  • Sohn, K., & Kwon, O. (2020). Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial intelligence-based intelligent products. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324
  • Spinsante, S., Stara, V., Felici, E., Montanini, L., Raffaeli, L., Rossi, L., & Gambi, E. (2017). The human factor in the design of successful ambient assisted living technologies. In C. Dobre, C. Mavromoustakis, N. Garcia, R. Goleva, & G. Mastorakis (Eds.), Ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments (pp. 61–89). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805195-5.00004-1
  • United Nations. (2020). World Population Ageing 2020 Highlights: Living arrangements of older persons. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd-2020_world_population_ageing_highlights.pdf
  • Van Hoof, J., Kort, H. S., Rutten, P. G., & Duijnstee, M. S. H. (2011). Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(5), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.010
  • VanDerSchaaf, H. P., Daim, T. U., & Basoglu, N. A. (2023). Factors influencing student information technology adoption. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(2), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3053966
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  • Wang, E. S. T. (2014). Perceived control and gender difference on the relationship between trialability and intent to play new online games. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.016
  • Wang, X., McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2020). I want it anyway: Consumer perceptions of smart home devices. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(5), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1528486
  • Ward, R. (2013). The application of technology acceptance and diffusion of innovation models in healthcare informatics. Health Policy and Technology, 2(4), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.07.002
  • World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186468/WHO_FWC_ALC_15.01_eng.pdf
  • Wu, L. H., Wu, L. C., & Chang, S. C. (2016). Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005
  • Xi, W., Zhang, X., & Ayalon, L. (2022a). The framing effect of intergenerational comparison of technologies on technophobia among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(7), 1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab199
  • Xi, W., Zhang, X., & Ayalon, L. (2022b). When less intergenerational closeness helps: The influence of intergenerational physical proximity and technology attributes on technophobia among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107234
  • Xiong, B., Skitmore, M., & Xia, B. (2015). A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research. Automation in Construction, 49, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.006
  • Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429880520030
  • Zhang, M., Shu, L., Luo, X., Yuan, M., & Zheng, X. (2022). Virtual reality technology in construction safety training: Extended technology acceptance model. Automation in Construction, 135, 104113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104113
  • Zhou, Y., Li, C., Wang, M., Xu, S., Wang, L., Hu, J., Ding, L., & Wang, W. (2022). Universal health coverage in China: A serial national cross-sectional study of surveys from 2003 to 2018. The Lancet Public Health, 7(12), e1051–e1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00251-1
  • Zhou, Y., Wang, L., Xu, Y., Ding, L., & Tang, Z. (2022). Intelligent fangcang shelter hospital systems for major public health emergencies: The case of the optics valley fangcang shelter hospital. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(1), 05021010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000976

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.