The Impact of Sustainable Technologies in the Perceived Well-being: The Role of Intrinsic Motivations

References

• Abu Bakar, A. A., Osman, M. M., Bachok, S., Ibrahim, M., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2015). Modelling economic wellbeing and social wellbeing for sustainability: A theoretical concept. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28(2014), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.037
   Google Scholar
• Administration, I. T. (2021). Greece – Energy. Retrieved from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/greece-energy
   Google Scholar
• Adu-Gyamfi, G., Song, H., Nketiah, E., Obuobi, B., Adjei, M., & Cudjoe, D. (2022). Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles. Energy, 251, 123862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan, A., Sadiq, M., Hassan, S. T., Khan, I., & Khan, N. H. (2022). Combined nonlinear effects of urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. An application of QARDL and KRLS. Urban Climate, 46, 101342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam, W., Khan, I., & Ali, S. A. (2023). Alternative energy and natural resources in determining environmental sustainability: A look at the role of government final consumption expenditures in France. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(1), 1949–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22334-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto, M. L., Szóstek, A., Karapanos, E., Nunes, N. J., Pereira, L., & Quintal, F. (2014). Understanding families’ motivations for sustainable behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, T. (2011). Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, S., Nash, N., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Haggar, P., & Brügger, A. (2022). The connection between subjective wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviour: Individual and cross-national characteristics in a seven-country study. Environmental Science & Policy, 133(February), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.025
   Google Scholar
• Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(4), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii–xvi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çop, S., Alola, U. V., & Alola, A. A. (2020). Perceived behavioral control as a mediator of hotels’ green training, environmental commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior: A sustainable environmental practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3495–3508. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çop, S., Olorunsola, V. O., & Alola, U. V. (2021). Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosno, J. L., & Cui, A. P. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the adoption of sustainable technology. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679220213
   Google Scholar
• Dadzie, J., Runeson, G., Ding, G., & Bondinuba, F. K. (2018). Barriers to adoption of sustainable technologies for energy-efficient building upgrade-Semi-structured interviews. Buildings, 8(4), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8040057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. W. (2011). Evaluating the slow adoption of energy efficient investments: Are renters less likely to have energy efficient appliances? In D. Fullerton & C. Wolfram (Eds.), The design and implementation of US climate policThe design and implementation of US climate policy (pp. 301–316). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-01702-000
   Google Scholar
• Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2011). Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594321003590630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hedhli, K., Chebat, J. C., & Sirgy, M. J. (2013). Shopping well-being at the mall: Construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erell, E., Portnov, B. A., & Assif, M. (2018). Modifying behaviour to save energy at home is harder than we think…. Energy and Buildings, 179, 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2019). 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, 62, 125–199. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2019:158:TOC
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2019). Household composition statistics. Eurostat-Statistics Explained. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Household_composition_statistics
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpel, H., Graf, V., & Graf-Drasch, V. (2020). A comprehensive model for individuals’ acceptance of smart energy technology – A meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 138, 111196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girod, B., Mayer, S., & Nägele, F. (2017). Economic versus belief-based models: Shedding light on the adoption of novel green technologies. Energy Policy, 101(May 2016), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.065
   Google Scholar
• Guillen-Royo, M. (2019). Sustainable consumption and wellbeing: Does on-line shopping matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 1112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas, M. Hult, Christian Ringle, & Marko Sarstedt, Eds.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Jakučionytė-Skodienė, M., Krikštolaitis, R., & Liobikienė, G. (2022). The contribution of changes in climate-friendly behaviour, climate change concern and personal responsibility to household greenhouse gas emissions: Heating/cooling and transport activities in the European Union. Energy, 246, 123387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie, H., Khan, I., Alharthi, M., Zafar, M. W., & Saeed, A. (2023). Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development. Utilities Policy, 81, 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamolsook, A., Badir, Y. F., & Frank, B. (2019). Consumers’ switching to disruptive technology products: The roles of comparative economic value and technology type. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, X., Du, H. S., Wagner, C. (2019). Encouraging individuals to go green by gamification: An empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Secure ICT Platform for the 4th Industrial Revolution, PACIS 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, W., Liu, H., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2009). How do mediated and non-mediated power affect electronic supply chain management system adoption? The mediating effects of trust and institutional pressures. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumareswaran, K., Rajapaksha, I., & Jayasinghe, G. Y. (2021). Energy & Buildings Energy poverty, occupant comfort, and wellbeing in internally displaced people’s residences in Sri Lanka. Energy and Buildings, 236, 110760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.-J., Sirgy, M. J., Larsen, V., & Wright, N. D. (2002). Developing a subjective measure of consumer well-Being. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146702238219
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Alharthi, M., Atil, A., Zafar, M. W., & Khan, I. (2022). A non-linear analysis of the impacts of natural resources and education on environmental quality: Green energy and its role in the future. Resources Policy, 79, 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Khan, I., Zakari, A., & Alharthi, M. (2022). Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment. Energy Policy, 170, 113238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019). A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, L., Zhao, J., Xu, T., Yang, H., Lv, T., Shang, K., Qiao, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). How does COVID-19 emergency cognition influence public pro-environmental behavioral intentions? An affective event perspective. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 168, 105467. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2021.105467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, M., Omann, I., Polzin, C., Spekkink, W., Schuler, J., Pandur, V., Brizi, A., & Panno, A. (2019). “Something inside me has been set in motion”: Exploring the psychological wellbeing of people engaged in sustainability initiatives. Ecological Economics, 160(February), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Nasseef, O. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based public healthcare systems: G2G knowledge-based exchange to enhance the decision-making process. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, P., Li, Q., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2021). Energy poverty and subjective well-being in China: New evidence from the China Family Panel Studies. Energy Economics, 103(August), 105548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105548
   Google Scholar
• Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S. M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K., Havens, J. C., Jirotka, M., Kacorri, H., Karwowski, W., Kider, J., Konstan, J., Koon, S., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Maifeld-Carucci, I., … Xu, W. (2023). Six human-centered artificial intelligence grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 391–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (2017). The additional benefits of energy efficiency investments—A systematic literature review and a framework for categorisation. Energy Efficiency, 10(6), 1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9528-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M. (2018). SmartPLS 3. 2015. Website. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., Roser, M., Rosado, P. (2020). Energy. Our World in Data. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1985). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being self-determination theory. Ryan.
   Google Scholar
• Sangroya, D., & Nayak, J. K. (2017). Factors influencing buying behaviour of green energy consumer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019). The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sequeiros, H., Oliveira, T., & Thomas, M. (2022). The impact of IoT smart home services on psychological well-being. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3), 1009–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10118-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauseef Hassan, S., Wang, P., Khan, I., & Zhu, B. (2023). The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Research, 113, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Sullivan, Y. W. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(7), 435–494. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unidied theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Ali, S., Akbar, A., & Rasool, F. (2020). Determining the influencing factors of biogas technology adoption intention in Pakistan: The moderating role of social media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2020). I want it anyway: Consumer perceptions of smart home devices. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(5), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1528486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M., Goel, S., & Menard, P. (2017). Shared benefits and information privacy: What determines smart meter technology adoption? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(11), 758–786. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M. C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the is community. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 34(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, P. J., Kranz, J. J., Veit, D. J. (2013). Beyond carrot-and-stick: How values and endogenous motivations affect residential green is adoption. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society through Information Systems Design (pp. Vol. 1, pp. 585–603). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258909427
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, P., Veit, D. J., & Sarker, S. (2019). Adoption of sustainable technologies: A mixed-methods study of German households. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., & Zhao, D. (2015). Do subsidies work better in low-income than in high-income families? Survey on domestic energy-efficient and renewable energy equipment purchase in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, C. (2018). Extending the TAM for Green IT: A normative perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J. K., & Kim, C. (2022). Positive emodiversity in everyday human-technology interactions and users’ subjective well-being. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2121564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. B., & Cho, E. (2016). Convergence adoption model (CAM) in the context of a smart car service. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Appau, S., & Lord, P. (2021). Energy poverty, children’s wellbeing and the mediating role of academic performance: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 97, 105206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar