From Video to Hybrid Simulator: Exploring Affective Responses toward Non-Verbal Pedestrian Crossing Actions Using Camera and Physiological Sensors

References

• Arhin, S. A., Gatiba, A., Anderson, M., Manandhar, B., Ribbisso, M., & Acheampong, E. (2022). Effectiveness of modified pedestrian crossing signs in an urban area. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 9(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2021.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Bortolotti, A. (2012). Empathy in cooperative versus non-cooperative situations: The contribution of self-report measures and autonomic responses. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37(3), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-012-9188-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(11), 1833–1833. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilinskyy, P., Kooijman, L., Dodou, D., Mallant, K., Roosens, V., Middelweerd, M., Overbeek, L., & de Winter, J. (2022). Get out of the way! Examining eHMIs in critical driver-pedestrian encounters in a coupled simulator. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 360–371). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546849
   Google Scholar
• Bethge, D., Kosch, T., Grosse-Puppendahl, T., Chuang, L. L., Kari, M., Jagaciak, A., & Schmidt, A. (2021). Vemotion: Using driving context for indirect emotion prediction in real-time. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 638–651). Virtual Event USA; ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474775
   Google Scholar
• Bindschädel, J., Krems, I., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: Exploring a motion-based approach for virtual reality experiments. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 82, 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M., Schubert, J., Pfleging, B., & Alt, F. (2019). Improving driver emotions with affective strategies. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3010021
   Google Scholar
• Braun, M., Weber, F., & Alt, F. (2022). Affective automotive user interfaces? Reviewing the state of driver affect research and emotion regulation in the car. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, K.-L., Lee, T., & Ho, A. H. (2007). Does mood state change risk taking tendency in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 22(2), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. A., Kessinger, J., Duncan, S. E., Bell, M. A., Lahne, J., Gallagher, D. L., & O'Keefe, S. F. (2020). The facial action coding system for characterization of human affective response to consumer product-based stimuli: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 920. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2016). The electrodermal system. In Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 217–243). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415782.010
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial action coding system: Investigator’s guide. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleureau, J., Guillotel, P., & Orlac, I. (2013). Affective benchmarking of movies based on the physiological responses of a real audience. In 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (pp. 73–78). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. S., Lapate, R. C., Shackman, A. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2018). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., Pons Rodriguez, G., Rao, S., El Ali, A., & Cesar, P. (2022). Exploring emotion responses toward pedestrian crossing actions for designing in-vehicle empathic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519764
   Google Scholar
• Golland, Y., Arzouan, Y., & Levit-Binnun, N. (2015). The mere co-presence: Synchronization of autonomic signals and emotional responses across co-present individuals not engaged in direct interaction. PLOS One, 10(5), e0125804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueguen, N., Eyssartier, C., & Meineri, S. (2016). A pedestrian’s smile and drivers’ behavior: When a smile increases careful driving. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéguen, N., Meineri, S., & Eyssartier, C. (2015). A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: A field experiment at the pedestrian crossing. Safety Science, 75, 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibovic, A., Lundgren, V. M., Andersson, J., Klingegård, M., Lagström, T., Sirkka, A., Fagerlönn, J., Edgren, C., Fredriksson, R., Krupenia, S., Saluäär, D., & Larsson, P. (2018). Communicating intent of automated vehicles to pedestrians. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. M., & Weber, P. (2008). Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, J., & Picard, R. (2005). Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2005.848368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbron, F. C., & Niebles, J. C. (2014). Collecting and annotating human activities in web videos. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (pp. 377–384). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2578726.2578775
   Google Scholar
• Helm, J. L., Sbarra, D., & Ferrer, E. (2012). Assessing cross-partner associations in physiological responses via coupled oscillator models. Emotion, 12(4), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, S., Althoff, F., McGlaun, G., & Rigoll, G. (2005). Bimodal fusion of emotional data in an automotive environment. In Proceedings.(ICASSP’05). IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. ii–1085). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, H., Zhu, Z., Gao, Z., & Zheng, R. (2018). Analysis on biosignal characteristics to evaluate road rage of younger drivers: A driving simulator study. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 156–161). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500444
   Google Scholar
• Ihme, K., Dömeland, C., Freese, M., & Jipp, M. (2018). Frustration in the face of the driver: A simulator study on facial muscle activity during frustrated driving. Interaction Studies, 19(3), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17005.ihm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihme, K., Unni, A., Zhang, M., Rieger, J. W., & Jipp, M. (2018). Recognizing frustration of drivers from face video recordings and brain activation measurements with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, M. (2015). Towards affect-integrated driving behaviour research. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16(6), 553–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2015.1067934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, M. (2016). Don’t cry while you’re driving: Sad driving is as bad as angry driving. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(10), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1198524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, M., Yim, J.-B., & Walker, B. N. (2011). An angry driver is not the same as a fearful driver: Effects of specific negative emotions on risk perception, driving performance, and workload. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 137–142). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, K., Mishra, V., Liu, S., Berger, T., Fleisch, E., Kotz, D., & Wortmann, F. (2021). When do drivers interact with in-vehicle well-being interventions? An exploratory analysis of a longitudinal study on public roads. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 5(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448116
   Google Scholar
• Kooij, J. F. P., Schneider, N., Flohr, F., & Gavrila, D. M. (2014). Context-based pedestrian path prediction. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 618–633). LNCS.
   Google Scholar
• Kotseruba, I., Rasouli, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2016). Joint attention in autonomous driving (JAAD). arXiv preprint arXiv160904741, 264–269.
   Google Scholar
• Likas, A., Vlassis, N., & Verbeek, J. J. (2003). The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognition, 36(2), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00060-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Regulation of the neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: Effects of meditative expertise. PLOS One, 3(3), e1897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Mahmoud, M., Robinson, P., Dias, E., & Skrypchuk, L. (2017). Automatic detection of a driver’s complex mental states. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 678–691). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Magaña, V. C., Scherz, W. D., Seepold, R., Madrid, N. M., Pañeda, X. G., & Garcia, R. (2020). The effects of the driver’s mental state and passenger compartment conditions on driving performance and driving stress. Sensors, 20(18), 5274. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevan, K., Somanath, S., & Sharlin, E. (2018). Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 429). Associated Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Malta, L., Angkititrakul, P., Miyajima, C., & Takeda, K. (2008). Multi-modal real-world driving data collection, transcription, and integration using bayesian network. In 2008 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (pp. 150–155). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Masip, D., North, M. S., Todorov, A., & Osherson, D. N. (2014). Automated prediction of preferences using facial expressions. PLOS One, 9(2), e87434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megías, A., Maldonado, A., Cándido, A., & Catena, A. (2011). Emotional modulation of urgent and evaluative behaviors in risky driving scenarios. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 813–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology, 14(4), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesken, J., Hagenzieker, M. P., Rothengatter, T., & de Waard, D. (2007). Frequency, determinants, and consequences of different drivers’ emotions: An on-the-road study using self-reports,(observed) behaviour, and physiology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(6), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munla, N., Khalil, M., Shahin, A., & Mourad, A. (2015). Driver stress level detection using HRV analysis. In 2015 International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME) (pp. 61–64). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME.2015.7323251
   Google Scholar
• Nason, G. P., & Silverman, B. W. (1995). The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications. In Wavelets and statistics (pp. 281–299). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanael, D., Portouli, E., Papakostopoulos, V., Gkikas, K., Amditis, A. (2018). Naturalistic observation of interactions between car drivers and pedestrians in high density urban settings. In Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 389–397).
   Google Scholar
• Paschero, M., Del Vescovo, G., Benucci, L., Rizzi, A., Santello, M., Fabbri, G., Mascioli, F. F. (2012). A real time classifier for emotion and stress recognition in a vehicle driver. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (pp. 1690–1695). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pfleging, B., Fekety, D. K., Schmidt, A., & Kun, A. L. (2016). A model relating pupil diameter to mental workload and lighting conditions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5776–5788). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858117
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. W. (2000). Affective computing. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1511/2001.28.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranasinghe, C., Holländer, K., Currano, R., Sirkin, D., Moore, D., Schneegass, S., & Ju, W. (2020). Autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction across cultures: Towards designing better external human machine interfaces (eHMIs). In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382957
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, P., Pramesh, C., & Aggarwal, R. (2017). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 8(4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_123_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao, S., Ghosh, S., Pons Rodriguez, G., Röggla, T., El Ali, A., & Cesar, P. (2022). Investigating affective responses toward in-video pedestrian crossing actions using camera and physiological sensors. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 226–235). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546842
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, A., Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2017a). Agreeing to cross: How drivers and pedestrians communicate. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 264–269). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995730
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, A., Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2017b). Are they going to cross? a benchmark dataset and baseline for pedestrian crosswalk behavior. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 206–213). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, Z., Jiang, X., & Wang, W. (2016). Analysis of the influence of pedestrians’ eye contact on drivers’ comfort boundary during the crossing conflict. Procedia Engineering, 137, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.274
   Google Scholar
• Rigas, G., Goletsis, Y., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2012). Real-time driver’s stress event detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2168215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risto, M., Emmenegger, C., Vinkhuyzen, E., Cefkin, M., & Hollan, J. (2017). Human-vehicle interfaces: The power of vehicle movement gestures in human road user coordination. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 411–420). National Advanced Driving Simulator. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1633
   Google Scholar
• Roidl, E., Frehse, B., & Höger, R. (2014). Emotional states of drivers and the impact on speed, acceleration and traffic violations—A simulator study. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 70, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sani, S. R. H., Tabibi, Z., Fadardi, J. S., & Stavrinos, D. (2017). Aggression, emotional self-regulation, attentional bias, and cognitive inhibition predict risky driving behavior. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 109(190), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Etemad, A. (2020). Self-supervised learning for ECG-based emotion recognition. In ICASSP 2020 – 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 3217–3221). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053985
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., & Färber, B. (2009). Pedestrians at the kerb–recognising the action intentions of humans. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(4), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Daffy, M. (2012). Velocity versus safety: Impact of goal conflict and task difficulty on drivers’ behaviour, feelings of anxiety, and electrodermal responses. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneemann, F., & Gohl, I. (2016). Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 38–43). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2016.7535361
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, B., Wimmer, M., Arsic, D., Moosmayr, T., & Rigoll, G. (2008). Detection of security related affect and behaviour in passenger transport. In Ninth annual conference of the international speech communication association (p. 265–268). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, A. T., & Stiefelhagen, R. (2015). Pedestrian intention recognition using latent-dynamic conditional random fields. In 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 622–627). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225754
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., & Chen, F. (2007). Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2651–2656). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241057
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R. R., Conjeti, S., & Banerjee, R. (2013). A comparative evaluation of neural network classifiers for stress level analysis of automotive drivers using physiological signals. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 8(6), 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2013.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucha, M., Dostal, D., & Risser, R. (2017). Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 102(107050), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taib, R., Tederry, J., & Itzstein, B. (2014). Quantifying driver frustration to improve road safety. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1777–1782). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581258
   Google Scholar
• Vanutelli, M. E., Gatti, L., Angioletti, L., & Balconi, M. (2017). Affective synchrony and autonomic coupling during cooperation: A hyperscanning study. BioMed Research International, 2017(14), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3104564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Cesar, P. (2017). The play is a hit: But how can you tell? In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 336–347). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059465
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-A., Baird, T., Huang, J., Coutinho, J. D., Brien, D. C., & Munoz, D. P. (2018). Arousal effects on pupil size, heart rate, and skin conductance in an emotional face task. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 1029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Wu, J., Zheng, P., & McDonald, M. (2010). Study of pedestrians’ gap acceptance behavior when they jaywalk outside crossing facilities. In 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 1295–1300). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Hespanhol, L., Worrall, S., & Tomitsch, M. (2022). Pedestrian-vehicle interaction in shared space: Insights for autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 330–339). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546838
   Google Scholar
• Weber, F., Chadowitz, R., Schmidt, K., Messerschmidt, J., Fuest, T. (2019). Crossing the street across the globe: A study on the effects of eHMI on pedestrians in the US, Germany and China. In International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 515–530).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B.-F., Chu, Y.-W., Huang, P.-W., Chung, M.-L., & Lin, T.-M. (2017). A motion robust remote-PPG approach to driver’s health state monitoring. In C.-S. Chen, J. Lu, & K.-K. Ma (Eds.), Computer Vision – ACCV 2016 Workshops (pp. 463–476). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. (2017). Driver behavior impact on pedestrians’ crossing experience in the conditionally autonomous driving context.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, A., Chong Lim, Y., Baltrusaitis, T., & Morency, L.-P. (2017). Convolutional experts constrained local model for 3D facial landmark detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (pp. 2519–2528).
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S., Dittrich, M., Hernandez, J., & Schmitt, A. (2019). Towards empathetic car interfaces: Emotional triggers while driving. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S., Hernandez, J., Schmitt, A., Minker, W., & Picard, R. W. (2021). Driver emotion recognition for intelligent vehicles: A. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Miyahara, T., Mizuno, K., Ito, D., & Han, Y. (2021). Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 150, 105862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi, R., Liu, M., & Zhang, D. (2020). A comprehensive survey on automatic facial action unit analysis. The Visual Computer, 36(5), 1067–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-019-01707-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimasa, T., Jamson, S., & Henson, B. (2019). The influence of driver’s mood on car following and glance behaviour: Using cognitive load as an intervention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar