Consumer-Based Product Profiling: Application of Partial Napping® for Sensory Characterization of Specialty Beers by Novices and Experts

REFERENCES

• Abdi , H. , Valentin , D. , Chollet , S. and Chrea , C. 2007 . Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications . Food Quality and Preference , 18 ( 4 ) : 627 – 640 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert , A. , Varela , P. , Salvador , A. , Hough , G. and Fiszman , S. 2011 . Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture: Application of QDA®, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training . Food Quality and Preference , 22 ( 5 ) : 463 – 473 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares , G. , Deliza , R. , Barreiro , C. , Gimenez , A. and Gámbaro , A. 2010 . Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception . Food Quality and Preference , 21 ( 4 ) : 417 – 426 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet , S. , Lelièvre , M. , Abdi , H. and Valentin , D. 2011 . Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask . Food Quality and Preference , 22 ( 6 ) : 507 – 520 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dairou , J. and Sieffermann , J. 2002 . A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the flash profile . Journal of Food Science , 67 ( 2 ) : 826 – 834 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlholm , C. , Brockhoff , P. B. , Meinert , L. , Aaslyng , M. D. and Bredie , W. L. P. 2012 . Rapid sensory methods – Comparison of free multiple sorting, partial napping, napping, flash profiling and conventional profiling . Food Quality and Preference , 26 ( 2 ) : 267 – 277 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Det Danske Ølakademi . 2006 . “ Det danske ølsprog ” . In The Danish beer language , Copenhagen , Denmark : Danish Brewers Union .
   Google Scholar
• Garber , L. L. , Hyatt , E. M. and Starr , R. G. 2003 . Measuring consumer response to food products . Food Quality and Preference , 14 ( 1 ) : 3 – 15 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower , J. C. 1975 . Generalized procrustes analysis . Psychometrika , 40 ( 1 ) : 33 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husson , F. , Lê , S. and Pagès , J. 2011 . Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R , Boca Raton , FL : CRC Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jack , F. R. and Piggott , J. R. 1992 . Free choice profiling in consumer research . Food Quality and Preference , 3 ( 3 ) : 129 – 134 .
   Google Scholar
• Lawless , H. T. and Heymann , H. 2010 . Sensory evaluation of food. principles and practises , 2nd , New York , NY : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Lê , S. and Husson , F. 2008 . SensoMineR: A package for sensory data analysis . Journal of Sensory Studies , 23 ( 1 ) : 14 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê , S. , Josse , J. and Husson , F. 2008 . FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis . Journal of Statistical Software , 25 ( 1 ) : 1 – 18 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilgaard , M. C. , Dalgliesh , C. E. and Clapperton , J. F. 1979 . Beer flavor terminology . Journal of the Institute of Brewing , 85 ( 1 ) : 38 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morand , E. and Pagès , J. 2006 . Procrustes multiple factor analysis to analyse the overall perception of food products . Food Quality and Preference , 17 ( 1–2 ) : 36 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagès , J. and Husson , F. 2001 . Inter-laboratory comparison of sensory profiles: Methodology and results . Food Quality and Preference , 12 ( 5–7 ) : 297 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagès , J. 2003 . Recueil direct de distances sensorielles: Application à l'évaluation de dix vins blancs du val-de-loire. (Direct collection of sensory distances: Application to the evaluation of ten white wines from Loire Valley . Sciences des Aliments , 23 : 679 – 688 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagès , J. 2005 . Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire valley . Food Quality and Preference , 16 ( 7 ) : 642 – 649 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin , L. , Symoneaux , R. , Maître , I. , Asselin , C. , Jourjon , F. and Pagès , J. 2008 . Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire valley . Food Quality and Preference , 19 ( 1 ) : 1 – 11 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer , J. C. and Gilbert , C. C. 2008 . Napping by modality: A happy medium between analytic and holistic approaches . Proceedings of the 9th Sensometrics , Meeting, July 20–23, 2008, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Risvik , E. , McEwan , J. A. , Colwill , J. S. , Rogers , R. and Lyon , D. H. 1994 . Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research . Food Quality and Preference , 5 ( 4 ) : 263 – 269 .
   Google Scholar
• Robert , P. and Escoufier , Y. 1976 . A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV-coefficient . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) , 25 ( 3 ) : 257 – 265 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz , H. G. 1999 . Consumer data-sense and nonsense . Food Quality and Preference , 10 : 245 – 251 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , A. A. and Langron , S. P. 1984 . The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports . Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture , 35 ( 5 ) : 558 – 568 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar