Intention to Try Unfamiliar Food: The Role of Level and Type of Unfamiliarity, Food Neophobia, and Ethnocentrism

REFERENCES

• Aqueveque, C. (2006). Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: The influence of consumption situation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23, 237–247.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckström, A., Pirttilä-Backman, A., & Tuorila, H. (2004). Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite, 43, 75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisson, P. D. (1995). Developing new products for the consumer. In D. Marshall (Ed.), Food choice and the consumer (pp. 182–214). London, UK: Blackie Academic and Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. I. A., & Jongen, W. M. F. (2006). New insights into consumer-led food product development. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 17, 457–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eertmans, A., Victoir, A., Vansant, G., & Van den Bergh, O. (2005). Food-related personality traits, food choice motives and food intake: Mediator and moderator relationships. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 714–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, A., & Frewer, L. (2009). Consumer familiarity with foods and the perception of risks and benefits. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 576–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregan-Paxton, J., Hibbard, J. D., Brunel, F. F., & Azar, P. (2002). So that’s what that is: Examining the impact of analogy on consumers’ knowledge development for really new products. Psychology & Marketing, 19, 533–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, S. (2003). Measuring preferences for really-new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 406–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, S., & Ariely, D. (1999). Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8, 113–139.
   Google Scholar
• Kavak, B., & Gumusluoglu, L. (2007). Segmenting food markets: The role of ethnocentrism and lifestyle in understanding purchasing intentions. International Journal of Market Research, 49, 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62, 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, J. B. (1999). New product failure and success. In A. L Brody & J. B. Lord (Eds.), Developing new food products for a changing marketplace (pp. 55–86). Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, C. P., Lehmann, D. R., & and Markman, A. B. (2001). Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabih, M. I., Bloem, S. G., & Poiesz, T. B. C. (1997). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation adoption behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 190–196.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19, 105–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and solution. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, B., & Frank, R. A. (1999). Assessing food neophobia: The role of stimulus familiarity. Appetite, 32, 261–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehm, M. L., & Sternthal, B. (2001). The moderating effect of knowledge and resources on the persuasive impact of analogies. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, M. J. (1995). The food product development process. British Food Journal, 97(3), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Shimp, T., & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Shimp, T., Dunn, T., & Klein, J. (2004). Remnants of the U.S. Civil War and modern consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp, T., & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(8), 280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, R., & Shoaf, F. (1975). Behavioral changes in the trial of new products. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 104–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J.-B., & Gielens, K. (2003). Consumer and market drivers of the trial rate of new consumer products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 368–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, T., & Kwon, I.-W.G. (2002). Globalization and reluctant buyers. International Marketing Review, 19, 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuorila, H., & Mustonen, S. (2010). Reluctant trying of an unfamiliar food induces negative affection for the food. Appetite, 54, 418–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., & Lotti, L. (2001). Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkowski, T. (1998). Consumer ethnocentrism in two emerging markets: Determinants and predictive validity. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 258–263.
   Google Scholar