Factors Influencing Young Consumers’ Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food in India

REFERENCES

• Alba, J., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 123–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin L., Jahi, J. M. Nor, A. R. M., Osman, M., & Mahadi, N. M. (2006). Uncovering factors Influencing Malaysian public attitude towards modern biotechnology. Asia Pacific Journal of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, 14(2), 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, A., Mittelhammer, R. C., & McCluskey, J. J. (2007). Consumer response to information and second-generation genetically modified food in India. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Oragnization, 5(1), Article 8, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Angulo, A. M., & Gil, J. M. (2007). Spanish consumers’ attitudes and acceptability towards GM food products. Agriculture Economics Review, 8(1), 50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, G. A., & Burnham, T. A. (2001). Consumer response to genetically modified foods: Market segment analysis and implications for producers and policy makers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26, 387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batrinou, A. M., Dimitriou, E., Liatsos, D., & Pletsa. V. (2005). Genetically modified foods: The effect of information. Nutrition & Food Science, 35, 148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Boccaletti, S., & Moro, D. (2000). Consumer willingness-to-pay for GM food products in Italy. AgBioForum, 3, 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Bonny, S. (2003). Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and Europe. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 6(1), 50–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods: Results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 23–61.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2005). GM crops: The global economic and environmental impact: The first nine years, 1996–2004. AgBioForum, 8, 187.
   Google Scholar
• Bukenya, J. O., & Wright, N. R. (2007). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes. Agribusiness, 23, 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. Y., & Chern, W. S. (2004). Willingness to pay for genetically modified foods: Evidence from a public survey in the USA. In V. Santaniello & R. E. Evenson (Eds.), Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods (pp. 117–130). Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. F., & Li, H. L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 662–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, M. (2009). Consumer acceptance, choice and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. PhD thesis submitted to the Center for Research in Agro-food Economics and Development, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis K. R., McCluskey, J. J., & Wahl, T. (2004). Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world. Agbioforum, 7, 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, A., Scatasta, S., & Sturm, B. (2008). Does mandatory labeling of genetically modified food grant consumers the right to know? Evidence from an economic experiment. Zentrum fuer Europaeische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW)—Centre for European Economic Research No. 08–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, A. (2009). The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food—A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 68, 2182–2192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deodhar, S. Y., Ganesh, S., & Chern, W. S. (2008). Emerging markets for GM foods: An Indian perspective on consumer understanding and willingness to pay. International Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 570–587.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., & Howard, C. J., & Aaron, I. (1998). Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science, 52, 388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., & Shepherd, R. (1995). Ethical concerns and risk perceptions associated with different applications of genetic engineering: Interrelationships with the perceived need for regulation of the technology. Agriculture and Human Values, 12(1), 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J. (1998). Public perceptions of genetically modified foods. Pesticide Outlook, 9(5), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Galun, E. (2001). Genetically manipulated plants: Ethical and religious issues. In AgBioView Newsletter: Biotech Fearmongers; Jewish Perspective on GM, Syngenta.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskel, G., Allum, N., & Stares, S. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002. A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project Life Sciences in European Society. QLG7-CT-1999-00286.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G. A., Allansdottir, N., Allum, C., Corchero, C., Fischler, J., Hampel, J., … Wagner, W. (2006). Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Eurobarometer, Report 63.4. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G. A., Allum, W., Wagner, N., Kronberger, H., Torgersen, J., Hampel, & Bardes, J. (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24, 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Alum, N., Baouer, M., Durant, J. Allansdottir, A. Bonfadelli, H. … Wagner, W. (2000). Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology, 18, 935–938.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Castro, P., Esmer, Y. … Wagner, W. (2010). Europeans and biotechnology in 2010: Winds of change? Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• GEAC. (2009). Year wise list of commercially released varieties of Bt cotton hybrids by Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC). Retrieved from http://www.envfor.nic.in
   Google Scholar
• González, C., Johnson, N., & Qaim, M. (2009). Consumer acceptance of second-generation GM foods: The case of biofortified cassava in the northeast of Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 604–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsrud, K. M., McCluskey, J. J., Loureiro, M. L., & Wahl, T. I. (2004). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified food in Norway. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert, K., Sondergaard, H., & Scholderer, J. (2004). How can we know what we like when we don’t understand it? Consumer attitude formation towards complex technical issues. Presented in ICORIA, International Consortia on Research in Advertising, Olso, Norway. Crossenz, QLK1-CT-2002-02208.
   Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G., Bredahl, L., & Scholderer, J. (2003). Four questions on European consumers’ attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food production. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 4, 435–445.
   Google Scholar
• Guivant, J. (2006). Transgenicos e percepcao publica da ciencia no Brasil (Transgene and public perception of science in Brazil). Ambiente and Sociedad, 9, 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Moran, D., & Allcroft, D. (2006). Valuing perceived risk of genetically modified food: A meta-analysis. In D. Pearce (Ed.), Environmental valuation in developed countries: Case studies (pp. 97–131). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. H., & Harrison, R. W. (2007). Factors influencing urban consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 700–719.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. W., & Han, J. H. (2005). The effects of urban consumer perceptions on attitudes for labeling of genetically modified foods. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 36, 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. W., Boccaletti, S., & House, L. (2004). Risk perceptions of urban Italian and United States consumers for genetically modified foods. AgBioForum, 7(4), 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R., Stanisstreet, M., Boyes, E., & O’Sullivan, H. (1998). Reactions to a new technology: Students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16, 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, P., Vermeer, E. B., & Zhao, J. H. (2006). Biotechnology and food safety in China: Consumers’ acceptance or resistance? Development and Change, 37, 227–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoban T. J., & Katic L. D. (1998). American consumer view on biotechnology. Cereal Foods World, 43, 20–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, F., & Onyango, B. (2004). Product attributes and consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28, 255–267.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, F., Onyango, B., Schilling, B., Hallman, W., & Adelaja, A. (2003). Product attributes consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27, 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• House, L., Lusk, J., Jaeger, S., Traill, W. B., Moore, M., Valli, C., Morrow, B., & Yee, W. M. S. (2004). Objective and subjective knowledge: Impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union. AgBioForum, 7(3), 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• IGMORIS. (2009). Indian GMO Research Information System. Retrieved from http://igmoris.nic.in
   Google Scholar
• James, C. (2011). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2009. ISAAA Brief no. 43. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. (1995). Public perceptions of genetic engineering: Australia 1994. Final report to the Department of Industry, Science and Technology, International Social Science Surveys.
   Google Scholar
• Klerck, D., & Sweeney, J. C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology & Marketing, 24, 171–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. G., Mather, D. W., & Holdsworth, D. K. (2005). Consumer benefits and acceptance of genetically modified food. Journal of Public Affairs, 5, 226–235.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna V. V., & Qaim, M. (2008a). Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers’ health in India. Agricultural Economics, 38, 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, V. V., & Qaim, M. (2008b). Consumer attitudes toward GM food and pesticide residues in India. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30, 233–251.
   Google Scholar
• Lahteenmaki, L., Grunert, K., Ueland, O., Astrom, A., Arvola, A., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2002). Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 523–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Kynda, R., Curtis, J. McCluskey, J., & Wahl, T. I. (2002). Consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in Beijing, China. AgBioForum, 5(4), 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. T. J. (1995). Demographic and socioeconomic influence on the importance of food safety in food shopping. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 24, 190–198.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M. L., & Bugbee, M. (2005). Enhanced GM foods: are consumers ready to pay for the potential benefits of biotechnology? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 52–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, J. L., & Traill, W. B. (2004). Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: Evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31, 179–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., Moore, M., House, L., & Morrow, B. (2002). Influence of brand name and type of modification on consumer acceptance of genetically engineered corn chips: A preliminary analysis. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4, 373–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., Daniel, M., Mark, D., & Lusk, C. (2001). Alternative calibration and auction institutions for predicting consumer willingness to pay for non-genetically modified corn chips. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26, 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk. J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30, 28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlier, E. (1992). Eurobarometer 35.1: Opinions of European biotechnology. In J. Durant (Ed.), Biotechnology in public: A review of recent research (pp. 52–109). London: Science Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Poveda, A., Molla-Bauza, M. B., Martinez, L. M., Gomis, F. J. D. C., & Martinez, L. M. C. (2009). Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of genetically modified food in Spain. Food Policy, 34, 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerbeek, H., & Casimir, G. (2005). Gender differences in consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 308–318.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, P., Harrison, A., Wilson, C. Baghurst, K. I., & Syrette, J. (2007). Attitudes, values, and socio-demographic characteristics that predict acceptance of genetic engineering and applications of new technology in Australia. Biotechnology Journal, 2, 1169–1178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moon, W., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (2001b). Public perceptions and willingness-to-pay a premium for non-biotech foods in the US and UK. AgBioForum, 4, 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, W., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (2004). Public attitudes toward agro-biotechnology: The mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness, and outrage. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26, 186–208.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, W., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (2001a, August). A multi-attribute model of public acceptance of genetically modified organisms. Paper presented at American Agricultural Economics Association 2001 Annual meeting, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Noomene, R. J., & Gil, M. (2006). Extent of knowledge and attitudes of Spanish consumers to genetically modified foods. Revista española de estudios agrosociales y pesqueros (Spanish Magazine of Agrosocial and Fisheries Studies), 201, 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Onyango, B., & Govindasamy, R. (2004, August). Measuring U.S. consumer preferences for genetically modified foods using choice modeling experiments: The role of price, product benefits and technology. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Onyango, B., Nayga, Jr., R. M., & Schilling, B. (2004). Role of product benefits and potential risks in consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods. AgBioForum, 7, 202–211.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, T. (2008). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): Transgenic crops and recombinant DNA technology. Nature Education 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/genetically-modified-organisms-gmos-transgenic-crops-and-732
   Google Scholar
• Priest, S. H. (2000). US public opinion divided over biotechnology? Nature Biotechnology, 18, 939–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2008). Factors explaining male/female differences in attitudes and purchase intention toward genetically engineered salmon. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 7, 127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, P. M. (1987). Apathy versus hysteria: Public perception of risk. In L. R. Batra & W. Klassen (Eds.), Public perceptions of biotechnology (pp. 219–231). Bethesda, MD: Agricultural Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20, 195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2003). Perception of gene technology, and food risks: Results of a survey in Switzerland. Journal of Risk Research, 6, 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (1999). risk perception by the public and by experts: A dilemma in risk management. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., & Drottz-Sjöberg, B. M. (1994). Risk perception of nuclear waste: experts and the public (Rhizikon: Risk Research Report 16): Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, A., & Townsend, E. (2006). Examining consumer behavior toward genetically modified (GM) food in Britain. Risk Analysis, 26, 657–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traill, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M. S., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., Moore, M., & Morrow Jr., J. L. (2004). Categories of GM risk-benefit perceptions and their antecedents. AgBioForum, 7(4), 176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Vilella-Vila, M., Costa-Font, J., & Mossialos, E. (2005). Consumer involvement and acceptance of biotechnology in the European Union: A specific focus on Spain and the UK. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 108–118.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Bai, J., Huang, J., Hallman, W. K., Pray, C., & Aquino, H. L. (2004, August). Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods: A comparison between the US and China. Paper presented at American Agricultural Economics Association Annual meeting, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar