Value is Simple. Valuation is Complex

References

• Asiyanbi, Adenyi. 2016. “Subject: Comment on REDD+ Readiness Implementation in Cross River, Nigeria.” Comment 23 for: April 28, 2016 Cap-and-Trade Workshop on Sector-Based Offsets (sectorbased4-ws) – 1st Workshop. http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm2/bccomdisp.php?listname=sectorbased4-ws&comment_num=31&virt_num=23.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. 1996. The Reinvention of Politics. Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, Nicholas. 2008. “Simplification is Complicated: Property, Nature, and the Rivers of Law.” Environment and Planning A 40: 1825–1842. doi: 10.1068/a40157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophers, Brett. 2014. “From Marx to Market and Back Again: Performing the Economy.” Geoforum 57: 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, Esteve. 2014. “Valuing Nature, Paying for Ecosystems Services and Realizing Social Justice: A Response to Matulis (2014).” Ecological Economics 110: 154–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, Jessica, and Daniel Chiu Suarez. 2016. “Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of ‘Selling Nature to Save it.’” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (3): 653–671. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1140018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felli, Romain. 2014. “On Climate Rent.” Historical Materialism 22 (3–4): 251–280. doi: 10.1163/1569206X-12341368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, Marion. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of “Nature”.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 1721–1777. doi: 10.1086/659640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2013. “[Postscript] It is Value that Brings Universes into Being.” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (2): 219–243. doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.012
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A Post-Capitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haya, Barbara. 2015. “Subject: Comments on Proposed California REDD Program – An Additionality Analysis.” Comment 31 for Comment on the potential for international, sector-based offset credits in the Cap-and-Trade Program (sectorbased2015-ws) – 1st Workshop. http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm2/bccomdisp.php?listname=sectorbased2015-ws&comment_num=31&virt_num=31.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, Petter. 2007. “Which Way is Up on Callon?” In Do Economists Make Markets? edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 225–243. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Matthew. 2016. “Resource Geographies I: Valuing Nature (or Not).” Progress in Human Geography. 1–12. doi:10.1177/0309132516670773
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, Giorgos, Erik Gomez-Baggethun, and Christos Zografos. 2013. “To Value or Not to Value? That is Not the Question.” Ecological Economics 94: 97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatani, Kojin, and Joel Wainwright. 2012. “‘Critique is Impossible without Moves’: An Interview of Kojin Karatani by Joel Wainwright.” Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (1): 30–52. doi: 10.1177/2043820612436923
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Rebecca. 2012. Fields and Streams: Stream Restoration, Neoliberalism, and the Future of Environmental Science. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Rebecca. 2013. “Reassembling the Structural: Political Ecology and Actor-network Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, edited by Thomas Perrault, Gavin Bridge, and James McCarthy, 213–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, Larry. 2015. “Subject: Comments on White Paper on Sector-Based Offsets.” Comment 33 for Comment on the potential for international, sector-based offset credits in the Cap-and-Trade Program (sectorbased2015-ws) – 1st Workshop. http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm2/bccomdisp.php?listname=sectorbased2015-ws&comment_num=33&virt_num=33.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Donald. 2009. “Making Things the Same: Gases, Emissions Rights, and the Politics of Carbon Markets.” Accounting, Organizations, and Society 34: 440–455. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matulis, Brett. 2014. “The Economic Value of Nature: A Question of Justice?” Ecological Economics 104: 155–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, Kathleen. 1999. “Selling Nature to Save it? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17 (2): 133–154. doi: 10.1068/d170133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, Kathleen. 2016. “Subject: A Jurisdictional Approach Will not Solve the Most Serious REDD+ Problems.” Comment 12 for: April 28, 2016 Cap-and-Trade Workshop on Sector-Based Offsets (sectorbased4-ws) – 1st Workshop. http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm2/bccomdisp.php?listname=sectorbased4-ws&comment_num=16&virt_num=12.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Deirdre. 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Tracey. 2015. “Comments on California’s Cap and Trade Program and REDD+. Comment 39 for Comment on the Potential for International, Sector-Based Offset Credits in the Cap-and-Trade Program (sectorbased2015-ws) – 1st Workshop.” Available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm2/bccomdisp.php?listname=sectorbased2015-ws&comment_num=39&virt_num=39.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, Phillip. 2013. “On the Possibility of Organ Markets and the Performativity of Economics.” Journal of Cultural Economy 6 (4): 386–401. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.772069
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, Slavoj. 2008. “The Liberal Utopia II: The Market Mechanism for the Race of Devils.” January 8. http://www.lacan.com/zizliberal2.htm.
   Google Scholar