A Team-Based Process for Designing Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: How Does My School-Site Leadership Team Design a CI3T Model?

References

• Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. (2012). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.), Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall/Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Committee for Children. (2007). Second steps violence prevention. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B., & Tankersley, M. (Eds.). (2013). Effective practices in special education. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. & Horner, L. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, T. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Social Skills Improvement System: Classwide Intervention Program. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. P., Lane, K. L., & Oakes, W. P. (2012). Score reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: A psychometrically sound, feasible tool for use in urban elementary schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D., Blasé, K., Metz, A., Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79, 213–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germer, K. A., Kaplan, L. M., Giroux, L. N., Markham, E. H., Ferris, G., Oakes, W., & Lane, K. L. (2011). A function-based intervention to increase a second-grade student's on-task behavior in a general education classroom. Beyond Behavior, 20, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008) Social Skills Improvement System: Rating Scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Bruhn, A. L., Eisner, S. L., & Kalberg, J. R. (2010). Score reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: A psychometrically-sound, feasible tool for use in urban middle schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Carter, E. W., Common, E., & Jordan, A. (2012). Teacher expectations for student performance: Lessons learned and implications for research and practice. In B. G. Cook, M. Tankersley, & T. J. Landrum (Eds.), Classroom behavior, contexts, and interventions (Vol. 25, pp. 95–129). Bingley, England: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Little, M. A., Sandmel, K., & Brindle, M. (2010). Story writing: The effects of self-regulated strategy development for second grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 44, 107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Harris, K., Graham, S., Driscoll, S. A., Sandmel, K., Morphy, P., … Schatschneider, C. (2011). Self-regulated strategy development at tier-2 for second-grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 322–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., Bruhn, A. L., Driscoll, S. A., Wehby, J. H., & Elliott, S. (2009). Assessing social validity of school-wide positive behavior support plans: Evidence for the reliability and structure of the Primary Intervention Rating Scale. School Psychology Review, 38, 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., Bruhn, A. L., Mahoney, M. E., & Driscoll, S. A. (2008). Primary prevention programs at the elementary level: Issues of treatment integrity, systematic screening, and reinforcement. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 465–494.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., & Menzies, H. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., Menzies, H. M., Bruhn, A., Eisner, S., & Crnobori, M. (2011). Using systematic screening data to assess risk and identify students for targeted supports: Illustrations across the K–12 continuum. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., Parks, R. J., & Carter, E. W. (2008). Student Risks Screening Scale: Initial evidence for score reliability and validity at the high school level. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 178–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., & Menzies, H. M. (2003). A school-wide intervention with primary and secondary levels of support for elementary students: Outcomes and considerations. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 431–451.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., & Menzies, H. (2005). Teacher-identified students with and without academic and behavioral concerns: Characteristics and responsiveness to a school-wide intervention. Behavior Disorders, 31, 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Menzies, H., Bruhn, A., & Crnobori, M. (2011). Managing challenging behaviors in schools: Research-based strategies that work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M, Oakes, W. P., & Kalberg, J. R. (2012). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., & Oakes, W. P. (2010). Project SUPPORT and INCLUDE: Knowledge, Confidence, and Use Survey (Full Model Training Series). Unpublished rating scale.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have tier 2 and tier 3 needs? Preventing School Failure, 58(3), 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., Cox, M. L., Schatschneider, C., & Lambert, W. (2013). Additional evidence for the reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale at the high school level: A replication and extension. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 21, 97–115. doi:10.1177/1063426611407339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., & Menzies, H. M. (2010). Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings (Unpublished rating scale).
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Menzies, H. M., Oyer, J., & Jenkins, A. (2013). Working within the context of three-tiered models of prevention: Using school wide data to identify high school students for targeted supports. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29, 203–229.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Parks, R. J., Kalberg, J. R., & Carter, E. W. (2007). Systematic screening at the middle school level: Score reliability and validity of the Students Risk Screening Scale. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Rogers, L. A., Parks, R. J., Weisenbach, J. L., Mau, A. C., Merwin, M. T., & Bergman, W. A. (2007). Function-based interventions for students nonresponsive to primary and secondary prevention efforts: Illustrations at the elementary and middle school levels. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Stanton-Chapman, T. L., Roorbach, K. A., & Phillips, A. (2007). Teacher and parent expectations of preschoolers’ behavior: Social skills necessary for success. Topics in Early Childhood, 27, 86–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, N., Hake, S., Wrigley, P., & Wang, F. (2011). Saxon Math. Austin, TX: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Retrieved from http://saxonpublishers.hmhco.com/en/sxnm_primary.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lynass, L., Tsai, S., Richmond, T., & Cheney, D. (2012). Social expectations and behavioral indicators in schoolwide positive behavior supports: A national study of behavior matrices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies, H. M., & Lane, K. L. (2012). Validity of the student risk screening scale: Evidence of predictive validity in a diverse, suburban elementary setting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 82–91. doi:10.1177/1063426610389613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, W. P., Lane, K. L., & Germer, K. A. (2014). Developing the capacity to implement tier 2 and tier 3 supports: How do we support our faculty and staff in preparing for sustainability? Preventing School Failure, 58(3), 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, W. P. Wilder, K., Lane, K. L., Powers, L., Yokoyama, L., O’Hare, M. E., & Jenkins, A. B. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Student Risk Screening Scale: An effective tool for use in diverse urban elementary schools. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Positive Action. (2008). Positive action: Positive development for schools, families and communities. Twin Falls, ID: Positive Action.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson Education. (2008). AIMSweb. Bloomington, IN: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Success For All Foundation. (2012). Success For All. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.successforall.org/Elementary/Powerful-Instruction
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Jolivette, K., Ennis, R. P., & Gilkey-Hirn, R. G. (2012). Defining “effectiveness” for students with challenging behavior: Teacher, instruction, and management variables. Beyond Behavior, 22, 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai, G. (2013). Keynote address. Paper presented at the Northeast Positive Behavior Support Conference, Cromwell, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A., & Horner, R. H. (2001). School-wide evaluation tool. Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Responsiveness to intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbreit, J., Ferro, J., Liaupsin, C., & Lane, K. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment and function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4., pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar