Impact of Cover, Copy, and Compare on fluency outcomes for students with disabilities and math deficits: A review of the literature

References

• Banda, D. R., & Kubina, R. M., Jr. (2009). Increasing academic compliance with mathematics tasks using the high-preference strategy with a student with autism. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54, 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Banda, D. R., Matuszny, R. M., & Therrien, W. J. (2008). Enhancing motivation to complete math tasks using the high-preference strategy. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 146–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A., McLaughlin, T., Weber, K. P., & Gower, J. (2009). The effects of copy, cover and compare with and without additional error drill on multiplication fact fluency and accuracy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7, 747–760.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (2003). Doesn't everybody need fluency? Performance Improvement, 42, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (2005). Behavioral fluency. In M. Hersen, G. Sugai, & R. Horner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavior modification and cognitive behavior therapy: Education applications (Vol. 3, pp. 1185–1188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Van Eyk, D. (1990). Precision teaching attention span. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., & Chavez, M. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., & Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39, 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Boice, C. H. (2008). Best practices in intensive academic interventions. Best Practices in School Psychology, V, 1151–1162.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Jiban, C. L. (2006). Assessing the instructional level for mathematics: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 35, 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Lee, K. H., & Pierce, T. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with mild-to-moderate mental retardation: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation, 39, 20–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calhoun, M. B., Emerson, R. W., Flores, M., & Houchins, D. E. (2007). Computational fluency performance profile of high school students with mathematics disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Taasoobshirazi, G., Stroud, R., & Royer, J. M. (2011). Combined fluency and cognitive strategies instruction improves mathematics achievement in early elementary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 323–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codding, R. S., Burns, M. K., & Lukito, G. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic-fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Barnett, D., Witt, J. C., & Olson, S. C. (2007). Varying intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36, 562–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Kilmer, A., & Massie, D. (1996). The effects of instructional matching and content overlap on generalized reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 507–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. M., & Johnston, J. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 289–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., … Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C, & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1987). Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 144–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafman, J. M., & Cates, G. L. (2010). The differential effects of two self-managed math instruction procedures: Cover, Copy, and Compare versus Copy, Cover, and Compare. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravois, T. A., & Gickling, E. (2002). Best practices in curriculum based assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, vol. IV (pp. 885–898). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. L. (1978). Writing skills. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 93–126). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A., Korinek, L., & Gorman, J. (1991). Self-management for students with mental retardation in public school settings: A research review. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 26(3), 271–291.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarie, J. J. (1986). Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of a recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M., Konrad, M., Cates, G., Vajcner, T., Eveleigh, E., & Fishley, K. M. (2012). A meta-analytic review of the cover-copy-compare and variations of this self-management procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubina, R. M., Jr. (2005). The relations among fluency, rate building, and practice: A response to Doughty, Chase, and O'Shields (2004). The Behavior Analyst, 28, 73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubina, R., & Yurich, K. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. L. (2006). Facilitating transitions between and within academic tasks: An application of behavioral momentum. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 312–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. L., Belfiore, P. J., Scheeler, M. C., Hua, Y., & Smith, R. (2004). Behavioral momentum in academics: Using embedded high-p sequences to increase academic productivity. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 789–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J., & Tingstrom, D. H. (1994). A group math intervention: The modification of cover, copy, and compare for group application. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 39–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, D. (1998). Research on self-management techniques used by students with disabilities in general education settings: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 310–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. D., & Heward, W. L. (1992). Do your students really know their math facts? Using daily time trials to build fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28(2), 98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. P., Stringfellow, J. L., Kaffar, B. J., Ferreira, D., & Mancl, D. B. (2011). Developing computation competence among students who struggle with mathematics. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44, 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Minskoff, E., & Allsopp, D. (2003). Strategies for academic success: Mathematics. In Academic success strategies for adolescents with learning disabilities and ADHD (pp. 221–222). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (2007). Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (2013). Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. M., Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2013). Comparison of a math fact rehearsal and a mnemonic strategy approach for improving math fact fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevin, J. A. (1992). An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 301–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, J. R., Cronin, J. F., Bassett, D. S., & Koppel, A. E. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Jaspers, K. E. (2007). Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, R. (1996). Self-monitoring for students with learning disabilities: The present, the prospects, the pitfalls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 317–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, R., Trout, A. L., & Schartz, M. (2005). Self-regulation interventions for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children, 71, 361–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhymer, K. N., Dittmer, K. I., Skinner, C. H., & Jackson, B. (2000). Effectiveness of a multi-component treatment for improving mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, D. M., & Bryant, B. R. (1992). Mathematics instruction for students with special needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of Cognitive Skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H. (2002). An empirical analysis of interspersal research: Evidence, implications, and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H. (2010). Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 166–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Bamberg, H. W., Smith, E. S., & Powell, S. S. (1993). Cognitive cover, copy, and compare subvocal responding to increase rates of accurate division responding. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., Williams-Wilson, S., & Johns, G. A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student response rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Ford, J. M., & Yunker, B. D. (1991). A comparison of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., McLaughlin, T. F., & Logan, P. (1997). Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 295–306.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K. L., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, S., McLaughlin, T. F., & Weber, K. (2002). The use and evaluation of cover, copy, and compare with rewards and a flash cards procedure with rewards on division math facts mastery with a fourth grade girl in a home setting. International Journal of Special Education, 17, 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). The effect of self-evaluation on teaching behavior in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2008). Examination of the utility of various measures of mathematics proficiency. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., & Coleman, M. (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 38–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. P., & Sloane, H. N. (1986). Teacher presentation rate and point delivery rate effects on classroom disruption, performance accuracy, and response rate. Behavior Modification, 10(3), 267–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, B. S., & Riccomini, P. J. (2007). Optimizing math curriculum to meet the learning needs of students. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52, 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S., Burke, L., Kunzelmann, H., & Koenig, C. (1978). Functional criteria in basic math skill proficiency. Journal of Special Education Technology, 2, 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar