Exploring instructional differences and school performance in high-poverty elementary schools

References

• Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235–251. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., Evertson, C., & Brophy, J. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. Elementary School Journal, 79, 193–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter, B., Arnold, C., & Swinson, J. (2010). A mass observation study of student and teacher behaviour in British primary classrooms. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26(2), 151–171.
   Google Scholar
• Beaman, R., & Wheldall, K. (2000). Teachers' use of approval and disapproval in the classroom. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 431–446. doi:10.1080/01443410020016662
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (1990). What's all the fuss about instructional time. The nature of time in schools: Theoretical concepts, practitioner perceptions. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/rbej.html
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507359
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2013). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America's youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, J. R., Borg, M. O., & Stranahan, H. A. (2012). Closing the achievement gap between high-poverty schools and low-poverty schools. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 5, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braswell, J. S., Lutkus, A. D., Grigg, W. S., Santapau, S. L., Tay-Lima, B., & Johnson, M. (2001). The Nation's Report Card: Math 2000 (NCES Document No. 2001–499). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–377). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, K., & West, J. (2002). Children's reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade. Educational Statistics Quarterly. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/quarterly/spring/q3-1.asp
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, P. L., Finnegan, R. J., Lutkus, A. D., Allen, N. L., & Campbell, J. R. (2001). The nation's report card for reading: Fourth grade. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. (1999). Early schooling and social stratification. In R. C. Pianta & M. J. Cox (Eds.). The transition to kindergarten (pp. 13–38). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Fram, M. S., Miller-Cribs, J. E., & Van Horn, L. (2007). Poverty, race, and the contexts of achievement: Examining educational experiences of children in the U.S. South. Social Work, 52(4), 309–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 577–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gable, R. A., Hester, P. H., Rock, M. L., & Hughes,  . (2009). Back to basics: Rules, praise, ignoring and reprimands revisited. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2012). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. doi:10.3102/0013189X15592622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissmer, D. W., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J. H., Williamson, S., & LaTourrette, T. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, P. L., Hummel, J. H., & Conroy, M. A. (1998). Increasing correct academic responding: An effective intervention strategy to decrease behavior problems. Effective School Practices, 17, 36–54.
   Google Scholar
• Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 5–13. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydon, T., Conroy, M. A., Scott, T. M., Sindelar, P. T., Barber, B. R., & Orlando, A. M. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 27–40. doi:10.1177/1063426609333448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydon, T., Mancil, G. R., & Van Loan, C. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(2), 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Hollo, A., & Hirn, R. G. (2015). Teacher and student behaviors in the context of grade-level and instructional grouping. Preventing School Failure, 59(1), 30–39. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kena, G., Aud, S., Johnson, F., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., & Kristapovich, P. (2014). The condition of education 2014 (NCES 2014–083). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. (2012). Education and poverty: Confronting the evidence: Education and poverty. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(2), 203–227. doi:10.1002/pam.21615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Reeves, T. (2012). Revisiting the impact of NCLB high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources: State NAEP 1990–2009 reading and math achievement gaps and trends. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 209–231. doi:10.3102/0162373711431604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S., & Vaughn, S. (2002). An observational study of teachers' reading instruction of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 215–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. M., Simonsen, B., & Sugai, G. (2011). Increasing teachers' use of praise with a response-to-intervention approach. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(1), 35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. S., & Pianta, R. C. (2008). Developmental commentary: Individual and contextual influences on student–teacher relationships and children's early problem behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(3), 600–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafpaktitis, M., Mayer, G. R., & Butterworth, T. (1985). Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval and their relation to student behavior in the intermediate school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 362–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governor's Association. (2005). Closing the achievement gap. Retrieved July 15, 2013 from http://www.eplc.org/education-policy/education-issues/achievement-gap/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. R., & Roberts, M. L. (2000). Ongoing reciprocal teacher–student interactions involving disruptive behaviors in general education classrooms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orthner, D. K., Cook, P. G., Rose, R. A., & Randolph, K. (2002). Welfare reform, poverty, and children's performance in school: Challenges for the school community. Children & Schools, 24(2), 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Partin, T. C., Robertson, R. E., Maggin, D. M., Oliver, R. M., & Wehby, J. H. (2010). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure, 54(3), 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, K. J. R. (2010). What does “highly qualified” mean for student achievement? Evaluating the relationships between teacher quality indicators and at-risk students' mathematics and reading achievement gains in first grade. Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 464–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher–child relationships and children's success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33, 444–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F. (2013). The widening income achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock, M. L. (2005). Use of strategic self-monitoring to enhance academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without exceptionalities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(1), 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. (1976). Recent research on teaching behaviors and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 61–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about the teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, G. (1978). The relationship of reliability in classroom research to the amount of observation: An extension of the Spearman-Brown formula. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15(3), 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheeler, M. C., McAfee, J. K., Ruhl, K. L., & Lee, D. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education: Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 29(1), 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Alter, P. J., & Hirn, R. G. (2011). An examination of typical classroom context and instruction for students with and without behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(4), 619–641.
   Google Scholar
• Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Whittaker, T. A., Richter, M., Johnson, N. W., & Trussell, R. P. (2009). Assessing teacher use of opportunities to respond and effective classroom management strategies: Comparisons among high- and low-risk elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Adler, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effects of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). The effect of self-evaluation on teaching behavior in classrooms for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 35, 161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Yoder, P. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(1), 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinson, J., & Knight, R. (2007). Teacher verbal feedback directed towards secondary pupils with challenging behavior and its relationship to their behavior. Educational Psychology in Practice, 23(3), 241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Tapp, J., & Wehby, J. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2008). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Poverty highlights. Retrieved February 2014 from https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/#1
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K., & Tracy, C. O. (2004). Increasing the odds: How good policies can yield better teachers. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Wyner, J. S., Bridgeland, J. M., & DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (2007). Achievementrap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Lansdowne, VA: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED503359)
   Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: Implications for prevention. American Psychologist, 67(4), 272–284. doi:10.1037/a0028015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar