Evaluating a self-regulated strategy development reading-comprehension intervention for emerging bilingual students with learning disabilities

References

• August, D., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Literacy instruction for language-minority children in special education settings. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: A report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 523–554). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., … Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014-4012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarría, J., & A. Graves. (2006). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching students with diverse abilities (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, N., Kleyn, T., & Menken, K. (2015). Looking holistically in a climate of partiality: Identities of students labeled long-term English language learners. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 14(2), 113–132. DOI:10.1090/15348458.2015.1019787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. S. (2011). Fountas and pinnell benchmark assessment System. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• García, O. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What's in a name? TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 276–328). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hagaman, J. L., Casey, K. J., & Reid, R. (2016). Paraphrasing strategy instruction for struggling readers. Preventing School Failure, 60(1), 43–52. DOI:10.1080/1045988X.2014.966802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-literacy Latina/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 224–243. DOI:10.1598/RRQ.32.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozwik, S. L., & Douglas, K. H. (2017). Effects of a technology-assisted reading comprehension intervention for English learners with learning disabilities. Reading Horizons, 56(2), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, E. O. (2006). Assessing comprehension thinking strategies. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse,
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Meadan, H., Hedin, L., & Corso, L. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for expository text comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 47–52. DOI:10.1177/004005990603800407
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Snyder, K. H., Sukhram, D. P., & Kedem, Y. (2006). TWA + PLANS strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 69–89. DOI:10.1177/001440290607300104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, J., Hussar, B., de Brey, C., Snyder, T., Wang, X., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., … Hinz, S. (2017). The condition of education 2017 (NCES 2017-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017144.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F., Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2005). Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz: Pruebas de aprovechamiento. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson. (2012). Aimsweb technical manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson, NCS.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, L. N. (2010). Reparable harm: Fulfilling the unkept promise of educational opportunity for California’s long-term English learners. Long Beach, CA: Californians Together.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367. DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, E., Witmer, S. E., & Schmitt, H. (2017). English language learners and reading instruction: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 136–145. DOI:10.1080/1045988X.2016.1219301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIDA Consortium (2010). Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State to State for English Language Learners: ACCESS for ELLs ®: ACCESS interpretive guide for score reports. Madison, WI: WIDA Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26(4), 207–214. DOI:10.1177/07419325050260040301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar