Improving reading within an urban elementary school: computerized intervention and paraprofessional factors

References

• Barber, M., Cartledge, G., Council, M., Konrad, M., Gardner, R., & Telesman, A. O. (2018). The effects of computer-assisted culturally relevant repeated readings on English learners. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 205–228.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Gardner, R., III, Cartledge, G., Ramnath, R., & Council, M. III, (2017). Second-grade urban learners: Preliminary findings for a computer-assisted, culturally relevant, repeated reading intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(2), 145–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2013a). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49(1), 39–51. doi: 10.1177/0022466913501882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2013b). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered educational practices to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. S., & Stanton-Chapman, T. L. (2017). Experiences of paraprofessionals in US preschool special education and general education classrooms. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 17(1), 18–30. doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartledge, G., Keesey, S., Bennett, J., Gallant, D., & Ramnath, R. (2015). Effects of culturally relevant materials on the reading performance of second–grade African Americans with reading/special education risk. Multiple Voices, 15(1), 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., & Jordan, W. J. (2003). Cultural issues in comprehensive school reform. Urban Education, 38(4), 380–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, M., III, Cartledge, G., Gardner, R., III, Barber, M., & Green, D. (2016). Reducing risk through a supplementary reading intervention: Descriptive studies of first and second grade urban students. Behavioral Disorders, 41(4), 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couse, L. J., & Chen, D. W. (2010). A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. M., Mars, D. E., & Burns, L. J. (2012). The relations of stressful events and nonacademic future expectations in African American adolescents: Gender differences in parental monitoring. Journal of Negro Education, 81, 338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Evaluation of the Stanford CAI program in initial reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 597–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction, 36(3), 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2006). Teaching for comprehending and fluency: Thinking, talking, and writing about reading, K-8. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, L., Thomas, N., and., & Lewis, L. (2010). Educational technology in U.S. public schools: Fall 2008 (NCES 2010– 034). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (2004). The importance of multicultural education. Educational Leadership, 6, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M. F., Doyle, M. B., & Suter, J. C. (2012). Constructively responding to requests for paraprofessionals: We keep asking the wrong questions. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 362–373. doi: 10.1177/074193251141472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, L., Cartledge, G., & Keyes, S. E. (2011). A preliminary investigation of supplemental computer-assisted reading instruction on the oral reading fluency and comprehension of first-grade African American urban students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(4), 260–282.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, L., Cartledge, G., Keyes, S. E., & Yawn, C. D. (2014). The effects of a supplementary computerized fluency intervention on the generalization of the oral reading fluency and comprehension of first-grade students. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(1), 25–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (Next ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from http://www.d11.org/edss/assessment/DIBELS%20NextAmplify%20Resources/DIBELSNext_AssessmentManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Latimer, R. J. (2013). DIBELS Next Technical Manual. Retrieved from https://acadiencelearning.org/splash/?ourl=/pubs.html
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. R. (2015). The effects of a computer-assisted and culturally relevant repeated reading intervention on the oral reading fluency of first grade students at-risk. OH, USA: Masters Thesis, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R. (2009). Treatment integrity: Revisiting some big ideas. School Psychology Review, 38, 547–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harn, B., Parisi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(3), 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2007). Discarding the deficit model. Educational Leadership, 64, 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• January, S. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (2012). The impact of context and word type on students' maze task accuracy. School Psychology Review, 41, 262–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaderavek, J. N., & Justice, L. M. (2010). Fidelity: An essential component of evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(4), 369–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourea, L., Cartledge, G., & Musti-Rao, S. (2007). Improving the reading skills of urban elementary students through total class peer tutoring. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1–2), 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffey, J. M., Espinosa, L., Moore, J., & Lodree, A. (2003). Supporting learning and behavior of at-risk young children: Computers in urban education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Bocian, K. M., MacMillan, D. L., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Treatment integrity: An essential—but often forgotten—component of school-based interventions. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 48, 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Fletcher, T., Carter, E. W., Dejud, C., & Delorenzo, J. (2007). Paraprofessional-led phonological awareness training with youngsters at risk for reading and behavioral concerns. Remedial and Special Education, 28(5), 266–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., Davis, J. E., & Sidler, J. L. (2005). Cultural relevance and computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 263–284.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, L., Burns, S., & McArthur, E. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Washington/DC: Diane Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. R. (2013). Analyzing poverty, learning, and teaching through a critical race theory lens. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moats, L. & Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, Washington, DC. (2007). Whole-language high jinks: How to tell when "scientifically-based reading instruction" isn't. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute. Retrieved on December 20, 2015, from: http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/publication/index.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musti-Rao, S., Cartledge, G., Bennett, J. G., & Council, M. (2015). Literacy instruction using technology with primary-age culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(4), 195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress: Achievement levels. (2012, July 12). Retrieved April 05, 2016, from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/achievement.aspx#table.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: A first look: 2013 Mathematics and reading trial urban district assessment (NCEs 2014-466). Washington, D.C: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/main2013/pdf/2014466.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., Hill, L. D., & Robinson, S. R. (2009). Who's at risk in school and what's race got to do with it? Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy a needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single‐subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, K., Berkeley, S., Hughes, M., & Kirby, S. (2014). Effects of computer-assisted instruction for struggling elementary readers with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(2), 106–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidence‐based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82(3), 1013–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Speece, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at-risk for reading failure. Journal of Reading Disabilities, 38, 387–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, W. D., Boon, R. T., & Spencer, V. G. (2013). The effects of repeated reading on the fluency and comprehension skills of elementary-age students with learning disabilities, 2001-2011: A review of research and practice. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 11, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 89–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J., & Kubina, R. M. (2006). Developing reading fluency with repeated reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 156–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Preventing early reading failure. American Educator, 28, 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J., & Lindamood, P. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(1), 40–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). What oral text reading fluency can reveal about reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstegen, D. A., Venegas, K., & Knoeppel, R. (2006). Savage inequalities revisited: Adequacy, equity, and state high court decisions. Educaitonal Studies, 40(1), 60–76.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Al Otaiba, S., & Petscher, Y. (2014). Oral reading fluency development for children with emotional disturbance or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(2), 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., & Reutebuch, C. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 317–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar