Implementing a RtI tier 2 mathematics lab in a middle school

References

• Bender, W. N. (2012). RTI in middle and high schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A. B., Petrin, R. A., Gravelle, M. L., & Farmer, T. W. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11. doi:10.1177/875687051103000402
   Google Scholar
• Berry, G. (2014). Literacy for learning: A handbook of content-area strategies for middle and high school teachers. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., & Cosby, M. D. (2017). Tier 2 response to intervention in secondary mathematics education. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(3), 239–247. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2016.1266595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Park, J. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39(4), 211–228. doi:10.177/0741932517721712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., & Chavez, M. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of Tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 20–32. doi:10.1177/0741932507309712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoon, M. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24(4), 235–245. doi:10.1177/07419325030240040601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Cary, M. S., Kosty, D., Baker, S., Fien, H., & Smolkowski, K. (2014). Preliminary evaluation of a Tier 2 mathematics intervention for first-grade students: Using a theory of change to guide formative evaluation activities. School Psychology Review, 43, 160–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, D. L., Algozzine, K., & Algozzine, B. (2014). Multi-tiered system of supports for inclusive schools. In J. McLeskey, N. Waldron, F. Spooner, & B. Algozzine (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools (pp. 197–209). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. S., Bryant, B. R., & Drogan, R. (2015). The impact of Tier 2 mathematics instruction on second graders with mathematics difficulties. Exceptionality, 23(2), 124–145. doi:10.1080/09362835.2014.986613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14–20. doi:10.1177/004005990703900503
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39, 22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Craddock, C., Hollenbeck, K. N., Hamlett, C. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Effects of small-group tutoring with and without validated classroom instruction on at-risk students' math problem solving: Are two tiers of prevention better than one? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 491–509. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. N. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 13–24. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00227.x
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Nelson, G., Pulles, S. M., Kiss, A. J., & Houseworth, J. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties? Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. doi:10.1177/0014402915625062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., & Smith, L. (2008). Implementation of response to intervention at middle school: Challenges and potential benefits. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 46–52. doi:10.1177/004005990804000305
   Google Scholar
• Kaji, A., H., & Lewis, R. J. (2015). Noninferiority trials: Is a new treatment almost as effective as another? JAMA, 313(23), 2371–2372. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6645
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. D., Harmon, M. T., & Gray, S. (2009). The effect of Tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(2), 116–130. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0101)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S., & Phillips, E. (2004). Connected mathematics project. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Beyers, S. J. (2012). Response to intervention mathematics: Critical elements. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 257–272. doi:10.1002/pits.21596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. V., Bragelman, J., & Stoelinga, T. (2016). Underprepared students’ performance on algebra in a double-period high school mathematics program. The Mathematics Educator, 25(1), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Jordan, J. (2010). RTI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 217–225. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00319.x
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. A., Wang, J., Brownell, M. T., & Gagnon, J. C. (2015). Mathematics interventions for students with learning disabilities (LD) in the secondary school: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13, 207–235.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2016). Principles for designing intervention in mathematics. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.intensiveintervention.org/sites/default/files/Princip_Effect_Math_508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prewett, S., Mellard, D. F., Deshler, D. D., Allen, J., Alexander, R., & Stern, A. (2012). Response to intervention in middle schools: Practices and outcomes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), 136–147. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. G., Bursuck, W. D., & Sinclair, K. D. (2013). Implementing RTI in two rural elementary schools: Encouraging beginnings and challenges for the future. The Rural Educator, 34(3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sansosti, F. J., Noltemeyer, A., & Goss, S. (2010). Principals' perceptions of the importance and availability of response to intervention practices within high school settings. School Psychology Review, 39, 286–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S. (2015). Improving student achievement by infusing highly effective instructional strategies into multi-tiered support systems (MTSS)—Response to intervention (RtI) Tier 2 instruction. The National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Improving Students Achievement Series, 15. Retrieved from http://mathedleadership.org
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Windram, H. S., & Bollman, K. A. (2016). Implementing response to intervention in secondary schools. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi–tiered systems of support (2nd ed., pp. 563–586). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978–1–4899–7568–2_32
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. J., & Okolo, C. (2010). Response to intervention and evidence-based practices: Where does technology fit? Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Progress monitoring as essential practice within response to intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Swindlehurst, K., Shepherd, K., Salembier, G., & Hurley, S. (2015). Implementing response to intervention: Results of a survey of school principals. Rural Special Education, 34(2), 9–16. doi:10.1177/875687051503400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B., & Lee Swanson, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RtI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 283–295. doi:10.1177/0022219410378447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. D., … Francis, D. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 244–256. doi:10.1177/0022219412442157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2011). Is a three-tier reading intervention model associated with reduced placement in special education? Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 167–175. doi:10.1177/0741932510361267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, S. J., Kaldenberg, E., & Therrien, B. (2013). The effects of preteaching on students at risk for and with math learning disabilities. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 14, 134–159.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, S. J., Watkins, J. R., & Abbitt, J. (2016). Teaching algebra to students with learning disabilities: Where have we come and where should we go? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 437–447. doi:10.1177/0022219414564220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellek, S. (2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence and noninferiority (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson, K. (2011). A systemic view of RtI research: Introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 503–511. doi: 10.1086/659029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar