Elementary special education teachers’ use of CBM data: A 20-year follow-up

References

• Bettini, E., Jones, N., Brownell, M., Conroy, M., Park, Y., Leite, W., … Benedict, A. (2017). Workload manageability among novice special and general educators: Relationships with emotional exhaustion and career intentions. Remedial and Special Education, 38(4), 246–256. doi:10.1177/0741932517708327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavendish, W., Morris, C. T., Chapman, L. A., Ocasio-Stoutenburg, L., & Kibler, K. (2019). Teacher perceptions of implementation practices to support secondary students in special education. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 1–9. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2019.1628000
   Google Scholar
• Chitiyo, J., & May, M. (2018). Factors predicting sustainability of the schoolwide positive behavior intervention support model. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), 94–104. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2017.1385446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232. doi:10.1177/001440298505200303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologist. School Psychology Review, 30, 358–374.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., Wayman, M. M., Deno, S. L., McMaster, K. L., & de Rooij, M. (2017). Data-based decision-making: Developing a method for capturing teachers’ understanding of CBM graphs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(1), 8–21. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. (2016). Curriculum-based measurement as the emerging alternative: Three decades later. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 5–7. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 449–460. doi:10.2307/1162454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellrung, K., & Hartig, J. (2013). Understanding and using feedback: A review of empirical studies concerning feedback from external evaluations to teachers. Educational Research Review, 9, 174–190. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, M. K., & Hosp, J. L. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading, spelling, and math: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 48(1), 10–17. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2003.10871074
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J., Schulze, M., Marti, A., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). Curriculum-based measurement of reading growth: Weekly versus intermittent progress monitoring. Exceptional Children, 84(1), 42–54. doi:10.1177/0014402917708216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J., Nese, J. F., & Alonzo, J. A. (2016). Teacher survey of the accessibility and text features of the Computerized Oral Reading Evaluation (CORE) (Technical Report #1601). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Behavioral Research and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B., Mirkin, P. K., & Deno, S. L. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification. The Journal of Special Education, 18(2), 109–117. doi:10.1177/002246698401800204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrell, K. W., Ervin, R. A., & Gimpel Peacock, G. (2012). School psychology for the 21st century: Foundations and practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson, Inc. (2012). Aimsweb technical manual. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, K. (2014). IEP use by general and special education teachers. Sage Open, 4(2), 215824401453041. doi:10.1177/2158244014530410
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., & Vanhoof, J. (2014). Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M. (2017). Reflections on teachers’ data-based decision making. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(1), 71–72. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, K. D., & Allinder, R. M. (1997). An exploration of the use of curriculum-based measurement by elementary special educators. Diagnostique, 23(2), 87–104. doi:10.1177/073724779702300203
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. L., Hammerschmidt-Snidarich, S. M., Espin, C. A., Seifert, K., & McMaster, K. L. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ interpretation of CBM progress monitoring data. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 22–31. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., Espin, C. A., McMaster, K. L., Deno, S. L., & Foegen, A. (2007). CBM progress monitoring within a standards-based system: Introduction to the special series. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 66–67. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., & Bateman, D. F. (2017). Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017): FAPE and the U.S. Supreme Court. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(1), 7–15. doi:10.1177/0040059917721116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar