Comparing the effectiveness of reading modifications on comprehension accuracy and reading comprehension rate

References

• Alber-Morgan, S. R., Matheson Ramp, E., Anderson, L. L., & Martin, C. M. (2007). Effects of repeated readings, error correction, and performance feedback on the fluency and comprehension of middle school students with behavior problems. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410010201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnback, E. (2004). When are poor reading skills a threat to educational achievement? Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 459–482.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, K., & Gast, D. L. (2011). Dependent measures and measurement procedures. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 129–165). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities 1995–2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509355988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, M., Skinner, C. H., Ciancio, D., Cazzell, S., Scott, K., Jaquett, C., Ruddy, J., & Thompson, K. (2019). A comparison of comprehension accuracy and rate: Repeated readings and listening while reading in second-grade students. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0169-3
   Google Scholar
• Bursuck, W. D., & Damer, M. (2011). Teaching reading to students who are at risk or have disabilities: A multi-tier approach. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Barth, A. E., Fletcher, J. M., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M., & Francis, D. J. (2011). The relations among oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension in middle school: Implications for identification and instruction of students with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading : The Official Journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 15(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens, R. H., & Meisinger, E. B. (2017). Examining the effects of reading modality and passage genre on reading comprehension in middle school students. Reading Psychology, 38(3), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1263701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiester, L. (2010). Early Warning! Why reading by the end of third grade matters. KIDS COUNT Special Report. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J., & Pumfrey, P. D. (1988). Differences in text comprehension amongst 7–8 year old children. School Psychology International, 9(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034388092008
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, B. E., Skinner, C. H., Mauer, K., Taylor, E., Schall, M., Cazzell, S., Ciancio, D., Conley, M., & Conley, E. (2015). Prompting faster reading during fluency assessments: The impact of skill level and comprehension measures on changes in performance. Research in the Schools, 22(1), 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, J. T., Skinner, C. H., Jackson, B., McDaniel, C. E., & Smith, S. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37(5), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(2000009)37:5 < 415::AID-PITS > 3.0CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2014). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Application in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 176–210). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Winn, B. D., Oliver, R., Allin, J. D., & Molloy, C. C. (2005). An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. O., Hale, A., Sheeley, W., & Ling, S. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary‐previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high‐school readers. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., Samuels, S. J., & Rasinski, T. (2012). Comprehension-based silent reading rates: What do we know? Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.531887
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, L. A., Ryan, M., Martin, R. B., Ewen, J., Mostofsky, S. H., Denckla, M. B., & Mahone, E. M. (2011). Working memory influences processing speed and reading fluency in ADHD. Child Neuropsychology : A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 17(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2010.532204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephs, N. L., & Jolivette, K. (2016). Effects of peer mediated instruction on the oral reading fluency skills of high school aged struggling readers. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: Implications for reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationship of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostewicz, D. E., & Kubina, R. M. Jr, (2011). Building science reading fluency for students with disabilities with repeated reading to a fluency criterion. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, R. S., Sharp, S., Bell, S. M., & George, T. (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 41(2), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. J., Speirs, K. E., & Shenassa, E. D. (2014). Reading disability and adult attained education and income: Evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study of a population-based sample. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412458323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, D. D., Smith, C. C., Cihak, D. F., Wright, R., & Gibbons, M. M. (2015). Effects of digital navigation aids on adults with intellectual disabilities: Comparison of paper map, google maps, and augmented reality. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415618927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017a). NAEP data explorer. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017b). NAEP Reading Report Card. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2017/#?grade=8
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Report of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Niedo, J., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Predicting levels of reading and writing achievement in typically developing, english-speaking 2nd and 5th graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T., Magpuri-Lavell, T., & Smith, G. S. (2014). Interpreting the relationships among prosody, automaticity, accuracy, and silent reading comprehension in secondary students. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296C13535170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. J. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1025118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, S. M., & Welling, K. A. (2001). “Read in your head”: A Vygotskian analysis of the transition for oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710121388 https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710151130172
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., Samuels, S. J., Hiebert, E., Petscher, Y., & Feller, K. (2011). The effects of silent reading fluency instructional protocol on students’ reading comprehension and achievement in an urban school setting. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903346873
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidenced-based strategies for reading instruction for older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., Hawkins, R. O., Stephenson, E., & Vicencio, K. (2019). The effects of two assistive technologies on reading comprehension accuracy and rate. Assistive Technology : The Official Journal of Resna, 31(4), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1431974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic skills problems (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, J. R. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8(1), 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Williams, J. L., Morrow, J. A., Hale, A. D., Neddenriep, C. E., & Hawkins, R. O. (2009). The validity of reading comprehension rate: Reading speed, comprehension, and comprehension rates. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spargo, E. (1989a). Timed readings in literature. Glencoe McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Spargo, E. (1989b). Timed readings (3rd ed.). Jamestown Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., Walker, M. A., & Vaughn, S. (2017, September/October). The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 576–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416638028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamm, L., Epstein, J. N., Denton, C. A., Vaughn, A. J., Peugh, J., & Willcutt, E. G. (2014). Reaction time variability associated with reading skills in poor readers with ADHD. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 20(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617713001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trainin, G., Hiebert, E. H., & Wilson, K. M. (2015). A comparison of reading rates, comprehension, and stamina in oral and silent reading of fourth-grade students. Reading Psychology, 36(7), 595–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.966183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Wexler, J., Vaughn, M. G., Fall, A. M., & Schnakenberg, J. B. (2015). High school students with reading comprehension difficulties: Results of a randomized control trial of a two-year reading intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(5), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413515511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Wanzek, J. (2014). Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful impacts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice : A Publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children, 29(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorstius, C., Radach, R., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Eye movements in developing readers: A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 458–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.881445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcutt, E. G., & Pennington, B. F. (2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with reading disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 41(8), 1039–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., Chhabildas, N., & Hulslander, J. (2005). Neuropsychological analyses of comorbidity between reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: In search of the common deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27(1), 35–78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2701_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Comparison designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Ed.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 297–345). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., & Bateman, D. F. (2017). Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017). FAPE and the U.S. Supreme Court. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917721116]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar