The effect of response modality on reading comprehension outcomes with the SRSD instructional approach for a youth in a residential treatment facility

References

• Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.) Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• BishopRoby, J. (2008a). Leveled texts for science: Earth and space science. Shell Education.
   Google Scholar
• BishopRoby, J. (2008b). Leveled texts for science: Life science. Shell Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman-Perrott, L., Davis, H., Vannest, K., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., & Parker, R. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, S., Urrutia, K., Buenger, A., Gonzalez, N., Hunt, M., Eisenhart, C. (2010). A review of the current research on vocabulary instruction. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/support/compfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., & Kim, Y. G. (2021). Is retell a valid measure of reading comprehension? Educational Research Review, 32(9), 100375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100375
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook, B., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T., McWilliam, R., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. (2014). Council for exceptional children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 206–212.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, M. E., Valentine, E. L., & Skemer, M. (2019). Experimental evaluation of transitional living services for system-involved youth: Implications for policy and practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho, M. J. (1986). Reading achievement of students identified as behaviorally disordered at the secondary level. Behavioral Disorders, 11(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874298601100305
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. P., Evanovich, L. L., Losinski, M., Jolivette, K., & Kimbell-Greb, K. (2017). Behavioral, academic, and social characteristics of students with emotional and behavioral difficulties served in a residential facility. In Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. (Vol. 40) Emerald Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. P., Harris, K. R., Lane, K. L., & Mason, L. H. (2014). Lessons learned from implementing self-regulated strategy development with students with emotional and behavioral disorders in alternative education settings. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. P., & Jolivette, K. (2014). Existing research and future directions for self-regulated strategy development with students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912454682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, R. M., & Pang, L. S. (2006). Alternative education programs: Program and student characteristics. The High School Journal, 89(3), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2006.0003
   Google Scholar
• Flower, A., McDaniel, S. C., & Jolivette, K. (2011). A literature review of research quality and effective practices in alternative education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(4), 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0038
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. C., & Barber, B. R. (2015). Research-based academic and behavioral practices in alternative education settings: Best evidence, challenges, and recommendations. In Transition of youth and young adults. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Garwood, J. D. (2018). Literacy interventions for secondary students formally identified with emotional and behavioral disorders: Trends and gaps in the research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9278-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self- regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139–187. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc. https://products.brookespublishing.com/Powerful-Writing-Strategies-for-All-Students-P186.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, J., Riccomini, P. J., Buford, R., & Herbst, M. H. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolivette, K. (2013). Challenges of conducting empirically-rigorous intervention and evaluative research in juvenile correctional facilities: Suggestions for the field. Journal of Correctional Education, 64, 37–50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26508106
   Google Scholar
• Jolivette, K., Boden, L. J., Sprague, J. R., Ennis, R. P., & Kimball, K. A. (2015). Youth voice matters: Perceptions of facility-wide PBIS implementation in secure residential juvenile facilities. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 32(4), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2015.1113457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolivette, K., Kumm, S., Sanders, S., & Mathur, S. R. (2022). Addressing the whole-youth: Characteristics and evidence-based practices and programs for systems-involved youth. In C. Lemons, K. L. Lane, & N. Powell (Eds.), Handbook of special education (volume 2): Research-based practices and intervention innovations (pp. 260–271). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jolivette, K., Sprague, J. R., Swoszowski, N. C., McIntosh, K., & Sanders, S. (2020). FW-PBIS framework implementation and facility climate perspectives through the lens of youth in juvenile facilities: A pilot study. Remedial and Special Education, 41(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519865258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostewicz, D. E., & Kubina, R. M.Jr, (2008). The national reading panel guidepost: A review of reading outcome measures for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33(2), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290803300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Barton-Arwood, S. M., Nelson, J. R., & Wehby, J. (2008). Academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in a self-contained setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9050-1
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. L., Carter, E. W., Pierson, M. R., & Glaeser, B. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140020101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, L., & Cardwell, J. A. (2017). Qualitative reading inventory: 6. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, R. E., Kon, D., Myers, P., Maccarry, D., Hughes, A., Burton, L., Sisson, K. (2018). Redefining residential: Integrating education in residential interventions. Milwaukee, WI. https://togetherthevoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ACRC_position-paper-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Losinski, M., Cuenca-Carlino, Y., Zablocki, M., & Teagarden, J. (2014). Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Reid, R., Hagaman, J. L. (2012). Building comprehension in adolescents: Powerful strategies for improving reading and writing in content areas. Brookes. https://products.brookespublishing.com/Building-Comprehension-in-Adolescents-P261.aspx
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties for the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, J. W., & Ciullo, S. (2016). Typical reading instructional practices provided to students with emotional and behavioral disorders in a residential and day treatment setting: A mixed methods study. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 33(3–4), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2016.1207217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, J. W., Garwood, J., & Solis, M. (2022). Reading instruction for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: A synthesis of observational research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09425-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2010). The reciprocal relationship between motivation and self-regulation: A longitudinal study on academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group (RRSG). (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D. K. (2011). A review of the psychometric properties of retell instruments. Educational Assessment, 16(3), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2011.604238
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, M. L., Jolivette, K., Kennedy, C., Fredrick, L. D., & Williams, C. D. (2017). Functionally-indicated choice-making interventions to address academic and social behaviors of adolescent students with EBD in a residential facility. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 52, 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rogevich, M. E., & Perin, D. (2008). Effects on science summarization of a reading comprehension intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders. Exceptional Children, 74(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, L. H., Sanders, S., Jolivette, K., & Virgin, A. (2022). Assessment of strategy instruction and self-regulation in reading comprehension: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure. Advance Online Publication. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2132198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S. (2020). Using self-regulated strategy development to teach reading comprehension strategies to elementary students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 43(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00009-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Ennis, R. P., & Losinski, M. (2018a). Academic and behavioral strategies to enhance the understanding of expository text for secondary students with EBD. Beyond Behavior, 27(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618780975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Ennis, R. P., & Losinski, M. (2018b). Effects of TWA on science text comprehension of students with E/BD in a special-day school. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Jolivette, K., & Harris, C. (2021). Improving the reading comprehension skills of systems-involved youth: A preliminary investigation of an underserved population. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Losinski, M., Ennis, R. P., White, W., Teagarden, J., & Lane, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) reading interventions to improve reading comprehensions of students with disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1545616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, S., Rollins, L. H., Michael, E., & Jolivette, K. (2022). “TRAP is legit!” Using self-regulated strategy development to teach reading comprehension in a residential treatment facility. Preventing School Failure, 66, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1972921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmel, K., Wilson, K., Harris, K. R., Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Oakes, W., & Steinbrecher, T. (2011). Success and failure with Tier 2 SRSD for timed writing tests among 2nd and 5th grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties: Implications for evidence-based practices. In T. Scruggs, & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in leaning and behavioral difficulties: Assessment and intervention (Vol. 24, pp. 251–294) .Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Nelson, C. M., & Liaupsin, C. J. (2001). Effective instruction: The forgotten component in preventing school violence. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 309–332. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899664
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980223001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2013). PND at 25: Past, present. And Future Trends in Summarizing Single-Subject Research. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512440730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Departments of Education and Justice. (2014). Guiding principles for providing high quality education in juvenile justice secure care settings. Washington, D.C. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/correctional-education/guiding-principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology.(Vol. 4., pp. 251–288). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar