Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model

REFERENCES

• Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065. doi:10.1002/ejsp.574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Avruch, K., & Vejerano, B. (2002). Truth and reconciliation commissions: A review essay and annotated bibliography. Online Journal of Peace and Conflict Resolution, 4, 37–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. doi:10.1207/pspr.1999.3.issue-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlow, F. K., Thai, M., Wohl, M. J. A., White, S., Wright, M.-A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2015). Perpetrator groups can enhance their moral self-image by accepting their own intergroup apologies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D. (2009). Reconciliation as a foundation of culture of peace. In J. de Rivera (Ed.), Handbook on building cultures for peace (pp. 363–377). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Evil: Inside human cruelty and violence. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman/Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 173–198. doi:10.1080/01973533.1995.9646138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C. (2012). Virtual special issue on theory and research on collective action in the European Journal of Social Psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 19–23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v42.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndsen, M., Hornsey, M. J., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2015). The impact of a victim-focused apology on forgiveness in an intergroup context. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 726–739. doi:10.1177/1368430215586275
   Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y.-R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 994–1014. doi:10.1037/a0026651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatz, C. W., & Philpot, C. (2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 995–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00318.x
   Google Scholar
• Blatz, C. W., Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30, 219–241. doi:10.1111/pops.2009.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyes-Watson, C. (2008). Peacemaking circles and urban youth: Bringing justice home. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002). Linking crime prevention to restorative justice. In J. Perry (Ed.), Repairing communities through restorative justice (pp. 67–83). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
   Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., & Cronin, T. (2010). Confronting the past to create a better future: The antecedents and benefits of intergroup forgiveness. In A. Azzi, X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, & B. Simon (Eds.), Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies (pp. 338–358). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (2004). Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., González, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Čehajić, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. P., Wohl, M. J. A., & Exline, J. J. (2008). Taking up offenses: Secondhand forgiveness and group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1406–1419. doi:10.1177/0146167208321538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, E. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393. doi:10.1177/1088868311411164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 283–301). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cehajic, S., Brown, R. J., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choshen-Hillel, S., & Yaniv, I. (2011). Agency and the construction of social preference: Between inequality aversion and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1253–1261. doi:10.1037/a0024557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corkalo, D., Ajdukovic, D., Weinstein, H. M., Stover, E., Djipa, D., & Biro, M. (2004). Neighbors again? Intercommunity relations after ethnic cleansing. In E. Stover & H. M. Weinstein (Eds.), Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity (pp. 143–162). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditlmann, R. K., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Dovidio, J. F., & Naft, M. J. (2015). Bridging awareness about slavery across the racial divide: Implicit power, African Americans, and interracial interactions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697–711. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, F., & Doxtader, E. (Eds.). (2010). In the balance: South Africans debate reconciliation. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.
   Google Scholar
• Exline, J. J., & Baumaister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 133–155). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. S., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1999). Injustice and power seeking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 834–849. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1994). Varieties of affect: Emotions and episodes, moods, and sentiments. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 263–289). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common intergroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191. doi:10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, M., Howard-Hassmann, R. E., Coicaud, J. M., & Steiner, N. (2008). The age of apology: Facing up to the past. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2003). A human being died that night: A South African woman confronts the legacy of apartheid. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gopin, M. (2004). Healing the heart of conflict: 8 crucial steps to making peace with yourself and others. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505–520. doi:10.1037/a0013748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J., Halperin, E., & Porat, R. (2013). Emotion regulation in intractable conflicts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 423–429. doi:10.1177/0963721413495871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, B., Porat, R., Bar-Tal, D., Bieler, A., & Halperin, E. (2014). Paradoxical thinking as a new avenue of intervention to promote peace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 10996–11001. doi:10.1073/pnas.1407055111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harth, N. S., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2011). Emotional responses to rejection of gestures of intergroup reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 815–829. doi:10.1177/0146167211400617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harth, N. S., & Shnabel, N. (2015). Third-party intervention in intergroup reconciliation: Examining the role of neutrality and common identity with the other conflict-party. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 676–695. doi:10.1177/1368430215583151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., Lolliot, S., Swart, H., Myers, E., Voci, A., Al Ramiah, A., & Cairns, E. (2014). Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(1), 39–53. doi:10.1037/a0035582
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E., Scabas, W. A., & Thakur, R. (Eds.). (2007). Atrocities and international accountability: Beyond transitional justice. New York, NY: United Nations University.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2010). Helping disadvantaged out-groups challenge unjust inequality: The role of group-based emotions. In S. Sturmer & M. Snyder (Eds.), New directions in the psychology of helping: Group-level perspectives on motivation, consequences and interventions (pp. 337–353). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R., & Werther, A. (2008). The social psychology of respect: Implications for delegitimization and reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group reconciliation: From violent conflict to peaceful co-existence (pp. 145–171). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. C. (2008). Reconciliation from a social-psychological perspective. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, L. (2007). Aspects, growth and sequences. International Journal of Peace Studies, 12, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The evocation of moral emotions in intergroup contexts: The distinction between collective guilt and collective shame. In N. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 35–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, E. (2006). Making enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Long, W. J., & Brecke, P. (2003). War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, I., & Bar-On, D. (2002). From working through the Holocaust to current ethnic conflicts: Evaluating the TRT group workshop in Hamburg. Group, 26, 29–48. doi:10.1023/A:1015595027902
   Google Scholar
• Mazziotta, A., Feuchte, F., Gausel, N., & Nadler, A. (2014). Does remembering past ingroup harmdoing promote postwar cross-group contact? Insights from a field-experiment in Liberia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 43–52. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meierhenrich, J. (2008). Varieties of reconciliation. Law and Social Inquiry, 33, 195–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, I., & Ferraz, L. (2015). The needs-based model of reconciliation in the South African context: A first investigation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, A. (2002). Post-resolution processes: Instrumental and socio-emotional routes to reconciliation. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education worldwide: The concept, principles and practices around the world (pp. 127–143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A. (2011). Reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional aspects. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of peace psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A. (2012). Intergroup reconciliation: Definitions, processes and future directions. In L. Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford book of intergroup conflict (pp. 291–309). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., & Saguy, T. (2004). Trust building and reconciliation between adversarial groups: A social psychological perspective. In H. Langholtz & C. E. Stout (Eds.), The psychology of diplomacy (pp. 29–47). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: The instrumental and socio-emotional paths and the needs-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2011). Promoting intergroup reconciliation in conflicts involving direct and structural violence: Implications of the needs-based model. In L. R. Tropp & R. K. Mallett (Eds.), Beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 201–219). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Newberg, A. B., d’Aquili, E. G., Newberg, S. K., & deMarici, V. (2000). The neuropsychological correlates of forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 91–110). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, J., & Lewis, C. A. (2008). On positive outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819–832. doi:10.1177/0146167208315555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374. doi:10.1177/1088868312440048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, J. (1998). The “ideal” of forgiveness: A philosopher’s exploration. In R. E. Enright & J. North (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness (pp. 19–34). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E. (1962). An alternative to war or surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. R., West, T. V., Dovidio, J. F., Powers, S. R., Buck, R., & Henning, R. (2008). The fragility of intergroup relations: Divergent effects of delayed audiovisual feedback in intergroup and intragroup interaction. Psychological Science, 19, 1272–1279. doi:10.1111/psci.2008.19.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Zebel, S., & Fischer, A. H. (2007). The past and the pending: The antecedents and consequences of group-based anger in historically and currently disadvantaged groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(1), 41–55. doi:10.1177/1368430207071339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. doi:10.1177/0146167207311283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaltis, C. (2011). Intergroup trust and contact in transition: A social representations perspective on the Cyprus conflict. In I. Markova & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representations, culture and dialogue (pp. 83–104). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N. (2004). Group identity and power asymmetry in reconciliation processes: The Israeli-Palestinian case. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 33–52. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac1001_3
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahdra, B., & Ross, M. (2007). Group identification and historical memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 384–395. doi:10.1177/0146167206296103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheff, T. J. (1994). Bloody revenge: Emotions, nationalism and war. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semin, G. (1997). The relevance of language for social psychology. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 291–304). Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Noor, M. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & SimanTov-Nachlieli, I. (2015). Group apology under unstable status relations: Perceptions of insincerity hinder reconciliation and forgiveness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 716–725. doi:10.1177/1368430214546069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014). Beyond need satisfaction: Empowering and accepting messages from third parties ineffectively restore trust and consequent reconciliation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 126–140. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v44.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030. doi:10.1177/0146167209336610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Noor, M. (2012). Competitive victimhood among Jewish and Palestinian Israelis reflects differential threats to their identities: The perspective of the needs based model. In R. J. Jonas & T. A. Merton (Eds.), Restoring civil societies: The psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis (pp. 192–207). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Ulrich, J., Nadler, A., Dovidio, J. F., & Aydin, A. L. (2013). Warm or competent? Improving intergroup relations by addressing threatened identities of advantaged and disadvantaged groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 482–492. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siem, B., Von Oetingen, M., Mummendey, A., & Nadler, A. (2013). Divergent motives of high- and low-status group members: The moderating role of perceived legitimacy of status differences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 137–148. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk, J. B. (2002). The form and function of reconciliation in primates. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., & Shnabel, N. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301–314. doi:10.1177/0146167213510746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., Shnabel, N., Aydin, A. L., & Ullrich, J. (2015). Agents of Morality: Affirming conflicting groups’ agency promotes mutual prosociality. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2013). Individuals’ and groups’ motivation to restore their impaired identity dimensions following conflicts. Social Psychology, 44, 129–137. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27, 867–894. doi:10.1111/pops.2006.27.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 778–795. doi:10.1037/a0026573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Cairns, E., Marinetti, C., Geddes, L., & Parkinson, B. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303–320. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea Culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Blackwell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkan, V. D. (2001). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large group identity. Group Analysis, 34, 79–97. doi:10.1177/05333160122077730
   Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135–159. doi:10.1080/10781910802544373
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, J. (2003). A plea against retributivism. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 7, 85–107. doi:10.1525/nclr.2003.7.1.85
   Google Scholar
• Winter, D. G. (1991). A motivational model of leadership: Predicting long-term management success from TAT measures of power motivation and responsibility. The Leadership Quarterly, 2, 67–80. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90023-U
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37. doi:10.1080/10463280600574815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J. A., Hornsey, M. J., & Philpot, C. R. (2011). A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls and a staircase model of effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 70–100. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01026.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodyatt, L., & Wenzel, M. (2014). A needs-based perspective on self-forgiveness: Addressing threat to moral identity as a means of encouraging interpersonal and intrapersonal restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 125–135. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar