Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis

References

• Abalakina‐Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson, R. P. (1986). Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16, 223–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, G. B. (2008). Conspiracy theory in film, television, and politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A, & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39, 184-207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkun, M. (2003). A culture of conspiracy: apocalyptic visions in contemporary america. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, D., Morgan, K., Towell, T., Altemeyer, B., & Swami, V. (2014). Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 156–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1987). Anti-semitic themes and the British far left: Some social-psychological observations on indirect aspects of the conspiracy tradition. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 115–136). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boag, E. M., & Carnelley, K. B. (2016). Attachment and prejudice: The mediating role of empathy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 337–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. M., & Bird, S. T. (2003). Exploring the relationship of conspiracy beliefs about HIV/AIDS to sexual behaviors and attitudes among African-American adults. Journal of the National Medical Association, 95(11), 1057–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Brock, T. C., & Brannon, L. A. (1992). Liberalization of commodity theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2014). Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2015). Intention seekers: Conspiracist ideation and biased attributions of intentionality. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0124125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(279), 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, D. C., Burgess, M. A., & Leask, J. (2006). The MMR vaccination and autism controversy in United Kingdom 1998–2005: Inevitable community outrage or a failure of risk communication? Vaccine, 24, 3921–3928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, R., & Geis, F. I. (Eds.). (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, K. (2009). The phenomenon of the conspiracy theory has contributed substantially to the belief that vaccination is the direct cause of autism. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 109, 384–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Olechowski, M. (2016). ‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 556–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte, U., & Edwards, B. (2008). White power music and the mobilization of racist social movements. Music and Arts in Action, 1(1), 4–20. Retrieved from http://musicandartsinaction.net/index.php/maia/article/view/whitepowermusic
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Clough, P. J. (2017). Urban legends and paranormal beliefs: The role of reality testing and schizotypy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(942). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00942
   Google Scholar
• Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., Denovan, A., & Parton, M. (2015). Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: A worldview. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(206). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1289–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zavala, Golec, & Cichocka, A. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-semitism in poland. Group Processes And Intergroup Relations, 15, 213-229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., … Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Jolley, D., & Wood, M. (2015). The social, political, environmental and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 183–200). Abingdon, Oxford, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2017, June). Reclaiming the truth. The Psychologist.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Leite, A. C. (2017). Suspicion in the workplace: Organizational conspiracy theories and work-related outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 486–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2004). Right about others, wrong about ourselves? Actual and perceived self-other differences in resistance to persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 585–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual impact of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 433–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015). Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71, 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22, 57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 538–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. (1999). Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1986). The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence. The Journal of General Psychology, 11(4), 351–357.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.). (2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York: Guilford press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosa, T. L. (2011). Counterknowledge, racial paranoia, and the cultic milieu: Decoding hip hop conspiracy theory. Poetics, 39(3), 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green & Douglas. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2013). The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology, 32(1), 100–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzesiak-Feldman, M., & Irzycka, M. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism and conspiracy thinking in a Polish sample. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 389–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., Hung, J. A., Glick, P., & Dinero, R. E. (2012). He loves her, he loves her not: Attachment style as a personality antecedent to men’s ambivalent sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1495–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Health Protection Agency (2008). Measles figures soar. Retrieved from: http://www.hpa.org.uk/NewsCentre/NationalPressReleases/2008PressReleases/081128measles/
   Google Scholar
• Heider, E. (1979). On balance and attribution. In (Eds.), Perspectives on social network research (pp. 11-23). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. (1964). The paranoid style in american politics and other essays. Cambridge, NY: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un‐) truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. K. (2017). Too special to be duped: Need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 724–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. K. (in press). How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014a). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases the intention to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014b). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLOS ONE, 9(2), e89177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018). Blaming a few bad apples to save a threatened barrel: The system-justifying function of conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 39, 465–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30, 3778–3789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. (2007). God as the ultimate conspiracy theory. Episteme, 4, 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, O. (2013). The lay historian: How ordinary people think about history. In R. Cabecinhas & L. Abadia (Eds.), Narratives and social memory: Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 25–45). Braga: University of Minho.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. (2003). Conspiracy theories in America: A historical overview. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy theories in American history: An encyclopedia (Vol. 1, pp. ix–x). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Kofta, M., Sedek, G., & Slawuta, P. N. (2011, July). Beliefs in Jewish conspiracy: The role of situation threats to ingroup power and positive image. Paper presented at the 34th International Society of Political Psychology (ISSP) conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, J. (2000). The projective perception of the social world: A building block of social comparison processes. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 323–351). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., & Sanitioso, R. (1989). Motivated changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). “I know things they don’t know!” The role of need for uniqueness in belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychology, 48, 160–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., & Kahn, R. (2005). The reptoid hypothesis: Utopian and dystopian representational motifs in David Icke’s alien conspiracy theory. Utopian Studies, 16, 45–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395–419). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology and Marketing, 14, 601–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 109–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, M. J., Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E. (2013). Uncovering and overcoming ambivalence: The role of chronic and contextually activated attachment in two-person social dilemmas. Journal of Personality, 81, 103–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? on the john f. kennedy assassination: biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 395-409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie-McHarg, A., & Fredheim, R. (2017). Cock-ups and slap-downs: A quantitative analysis of conspiracy rhetoric in the British Parliament 1916-2015. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 50, 156–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories: Public arguments as coded social critiques. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39, 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1987). The conspiracy mentality. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 151–169). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Offit, P. A. (2010). Deadly choices: How the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosz, G., Kreko, P., Paskuj, B., Toth-Kiraly, I., Bothe, B., & Roland-Levy, C. R. (2016). Changing conspiracy beliefs through rationality and ridiculing. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., & Van Bockern, S. (1994). The persistence of inoculation in conferring resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents: The second year. Human Communication Research, 20, 413–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. (1995). Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 25, 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1945/2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualter, T. H. (1985). Opinion control in the democracies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Radnitz, S., & Underwood, P. (2017). Is belief in conspiracy theories pathological? A survey experiment on the cognitive roots of extreme suspicion. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S. J., Snow, C. J., & Simon, D. (2003). Constraint satisfaction processes in social reasoning. In The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Rom, E., & Mikulincer, M. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1220–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. (1966). Whatever happened to the “Law of Primacy”. Journal of Communication, 16, 10–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R., & Robinson, E. (1967). Experiments in persuasion. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanitioso, R., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G. T. (1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapountzis, A., & Condor, S. (2013). Conspiracy accounts as intergroup theories: Challenging dominant understandings of social power and political legitimacy. Political Psychology, 34, 731–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, R. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004). The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 814–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The pursuit of human difference. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spark, A. (2000). Conjuring order: The new world order and conspiracy theories of globalization. The Sociological Review, 48, 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl, T., & Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In J.-W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics and paranoia: Why people are suspicious about their leaders (pp. 254–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Furnham, A. (2017). An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PloS one, 12, e0172617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443–463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Tran, U. S., Nader, I. W., Stieger, S., & Voracek, M. (2013). Lunar lies: The impact of informational framing and individual differences in shaping conspiracist beliefs about the moon landings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J., Douglas, K. M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016). Conspiracy thinking and climate change beliefs. In Oxford encyclopedia of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Tempel, J., & Alcock, J. E. (2015). Relationships between conspiracy mentality, hyperactive agency detection, and schizotypy: Supernatural forces at work?. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 136–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wal, R. C., Sutton, R. M., Lange, J., & Braga, J. P. N. (in press). Suspicious binds: Conspiracy thinking and tenuous perceptions of causal connections between co-occurring and spuriously correlated events. European Journal of Social Psychology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as a part of history. The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10, 323–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., Douglas, K. M., & de Inocencio, C. (2018). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 320–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigen, T. (2015). Spurious correlations. New York: Hachette Books.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willman, S. (1998). Traversing the fantasies of the JFK assassination: Conspiracy and contingency in Don Delillo’s “Libra”. Contemporary Literature, 39, 405–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2013). “What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015). Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 17 June 2015, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Hahn, U., & Osherson, D. (2014). Perception and identification of random events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1358–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar