Confirmation as coping with competition

References

• Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Beyth-Marom, R., & Fischhoff, B. (1983). Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376. doi:10.1521/soco.1986.4.4.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C. De Dreu & N. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 160–182). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Butera, F., Darnon, C., & Mugny, G. (2011). Learning from conflict. In J. Jetten & M. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference and defiance (pp. 36–53). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Butera, F., & Darnon, C. (2017). Competence assessment, social comparison and conflict regulation. In A. Elliot, C. Dweck, & D. Yaeger (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd edn., pp. 192–213). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1992). Influence minoritaire et falsification. A propos de “Quelques réflexions psycho–sociologiques sur une controverse scientifique” de B. Matalon [Minority influence and falsification. Considerations on “Quelques réflexions psycho–sociologiques sur une controverse scientifique” by B. Matalon]. International Review of Social Psychology, 5, 115–132.]
   Google Scholar
• Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low-competence source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butera, F., Mugny, G., Legrenzi, P., & Pérez, J. A. (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation, and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butera, F., Sommet, N., & Darnon, C. (in press). Socio-cognitive conflict regulation: How to make sense of diverging ideas. Current Direction in Psychological Science.
   Google Scholar
• Caverni, J.-P., Fabre, J.-M., & Gonzales, M. (Eds). (1990). Cognitive biases. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). Ten years of the rational analysis of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernyshenko, O. S., Miner, A. G., Baumann, M. R., & Sniezek, J. A. (2003). The impact of information distribution, ownership, and discussion on group member judgment: The differential cue weighting model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzevialle, M., & Butera, F. (2013). Performance-approach goals deplete working memory and impair cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 666–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzevialle, M., & Butera, F. (2017). Performance goals and task performance: Integrative considerations on the distraction hypothesis. European Psychologist, 22, 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardenne, B., & Leyens, J. P. (1995). Confirmation bias as a social skill. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1229–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, N. K., De Dreu, C. K., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. European Review of Social Psychology, 7(1), 145–172.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1979). Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems. American Psychologist, 34, 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoning. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. (1996). Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103, 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. (2008). The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 186–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Walther, E., & Nickel, S. (1999). The auto-verification of social hypotheses: Stereotyping and the power of sample size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2001). Confirmation bias in group information seeking and its implications for decision making in administration, business and politics. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality (pp. 53–74). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. E. (2008). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New Yourk, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Reasoning about social contracts: Cheating and perspective change. Cognition, 43, 127–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, M., & Gorman, M. E. (1984). A comparison of confirmatory, disconfirmatory and control strategy on Wason´s 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 629–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93, 216–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic‐materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2007). The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. Psychological Review, 114, 704–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, R. G. (1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 141–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, A. S., Toma, C., Oberlé, D., & Butera, F. (2014). The effect of grades on the preference effect: Grading reduces consideration of disconfirming evidence. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 544–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, A. S., Toma, C., Oberlé, D., & Butera, F. (2015). Grading hampers cooperative information sharing in group problem solving. Social Psychology, 46, 121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B.-A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249–279). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, P., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Influence sociale et processus de décentration [Social influence and decentring processes]. Bulletin De Psychologie, 45, 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson‐Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., & Legrenzi, M. S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 395–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review, 93, 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., McGregor, I., & Nash, K. (2010). Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. In D. L. Medin, J. Busemeyer, & R. Hastie (Eds.), Decision making from a cognitive perspective (pp. pp. 385–418). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1989). Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 596–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. (1980). Lay epistemo-logic; process and contents: Another look at attribution theory. Psychological Review, 87, 70–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing. Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook for motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 333–368). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. (2013). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2002). When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 648–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R., VanderStoep, S. W., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1991). Collective versus individual induction: Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 50–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Mens, G., & Denrell, J. (2011). Rational learning and information sampling: On the “naivety” assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases. Psychological Review, 118, 379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., Kim, E., & Schwarz, N. (2015). Something smells fishy: Olfactory suspicion cues improve performance on the Moses illusion and Wason rule discovery task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 47–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrenzi, P., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 359–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focussing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 37–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrenzi, P., & Legrenzi, M. (1991). Reasoning and social psychology: From mental logic to a perspective approach. Intellectica, 11, 53–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaine, G. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 17–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaine, G. (1975). Dissimilation and differential assimilation in social influence (situations of “normalization”). European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 93–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyens, J. P., Dardenne, B., Yzerbyt, V., Scaillet, N., & Snyder, M. (1999). Confirmation and disconfirmation: Their social advantages. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 199–230.
   Google Scholar
• Light, P., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (1990). Children’s reasoning on conditional promises and permissions. Cognitive Development, 5, 369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. F., Jr., Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Psychological needs and threat to safety: Implications for staff and patients in a psychiatric hospital for youth. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 415–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi, J., Butera, F., Legrenzi, P., & Mugny, G. (1998). Relevance of information and social influence in the pseudodiagnosticity bias. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57(3), 188–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. J. (1979). Psychology of the scientist: An evaluative review. Social Studies of Science, 9, 349–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, R. (2015). Cognition is a matter of trust: Distrust tunes cognitive processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 283–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, R., Alfasi, D., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Distrust and the positive test heuristic: Dispositional and situated social distrust improves performance on the Wason rule discovery task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 985–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. (1990). Some situational determinants of hypothesis-testing strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2016). The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 689–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 141–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., & Zeiss, A. M. (1973). Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroff, I. (1974). Norms and couter-norms in a selected group of Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review, 39, 579–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, D., & Butera, F. (2007). The distracting effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 194–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, D., & Fayant, M. P. (2010). On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self‐threatening upward social comparisons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 621–634.
   Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition–Performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1035–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation bias. In Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2): Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 191–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2011). Why grades engender performance avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 683–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulfrey, C., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Autonomy and task performance: Explaining the impact of grades on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 297–340). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 176–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Cultural and individual value correlates of capitalism: A comparative analysis. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (1981). Seek, and ye shall find: Testing hypotheses about other people. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition. The Ontario symposium(pp. 277–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (1984). When belief creates reality. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 248–306). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. A., Jr. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 148–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommet, N., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2015). To confirm or to conform? Performance goals as a regulator of conflict with more competent others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 580–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommet, N., Darnon, C., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Pulfrey, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2014). Performance goals in conflictual social interactions: Toward the distinction between two modes of relational conflict regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 134–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. pp. 181–227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesser, A., Millar, M., & Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C., Bry, C., & Butera, F. (2013b). Because I’m worth it! (more than others…): Cooperation, competition and ownership bias in group-decision making. Social Psychology, 44, 248–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 793–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2015). Cooperation versus competition effects on information sharing and use in group decision-making. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C., Gilles, I., & Butera, F. (2013a). Strategic use of preference confirmation in group decision making: The role of competition and dissent. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 44–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C., Vasiljevic, D., Oberlé, D., & Butera, F. (2013). Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 161–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary pschology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Mackie, D. M. (1987). Sensitivity to alternatives in social hypothesis-testing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Worner, W. J., Pliske, D. B., Mynatt, C. R., Gross, K. A., & Arkkelin, D. L. (1980). Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt, V. Y., Coull, A., & Rocher, S. J. (1999). Fencing off the deviant: The role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 449–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar