References
- Broccolo BM, Geetter JS. Conducting clinical research in non-traditional settings: Opportunities, challenges & risks. Paper presented at the Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research Human Research Participant Protection Conference, Boston, MA. Dec., 2005.
- Wolf LE, Walden JF, Lo B. Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:S30–S37.
- Federman DD, Hanna KE, Rodriguez LL (Eds.) Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.
- DeVries RG, Forsberg CP. What do IRBs look like? What kind of support do they receive? Accountability in Research. 2002;9:199–216.
- Gillet GR. Unnecessary holes in the head. IRB: Ethics and Human Research. 2001;23:1–6.
- Berman W, Breese P, Weis S, et al. The effects of local review on informed consent documents from a multicenter clinical trial consortium. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:245–55.
- Koski G, Aungst J, Kupersmith J, et al. Cooperative research ethics review boards: A win-win solution. IRB, Ethics & Human Research. 2005;25:1–7.
- Wagner TH, Cruz AM, Chadwick GL. Economies of scale in institutional review boards. Medical Care. 2004:42:817–823.
- Jansen LA. Local IRBs, multicenter trials, and the ethics of internal amendments. IRB: Ethics & Human Research. July-August. 2005;27:7–11.
- Ledbetter T, Davis S. IRB decision quadrant. US Department of Energy: Protecting Human Subjects. Fall, 2004;11:6–7,12–15.
- Office of Research Integrity. Available online at: http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/. Accessed August 11, 2005.
- Wendler D, Belsky L, Thompson KM, Emanuel EJ. Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard. JAMA. 2005, 294: 210–2166.
- Code of Federal Regulations. Available at online at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. Accessed August 11, 2005.
- Rosenstein DL, Miller FG. Ethical considerations in psycho-pharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects. Psychopharmacology. 2003;171:92–97.
- Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), World Health Organization (WHO). International Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. 1993. Geneva: WHO.
- Kipnis K. Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy. In National Bioethics Advisory Committee. Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, vol. II. Bethesda, MD. 2001;G-1–G-13.
- Maloney DM. New federal guidance adds duties for IRBs. Human Research Report. 2005;20:1–2. (The Deem Corp. P.O. Box 44069, Omaha, NE 68144).
- Hardy CM, Wynn TA, Huckaby F, et al. African American community health advisors trained as research partners: Recruitment and training. Fam Community Health. 2005;28:28–40.
- Keyzer JF, Melnikow J, Kuppermann M, et al. Recruitment strategies for minority participation: Challenges and cost lessons from the POWER interview. Ethn Dis. 2005;15:395–406.
- Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Vida P, et al. Strategies to recruit and retain older Filipino-American immigrants for a cancer screening study. J Community Health. 2005;30:167–79.
- Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA, Paskett ED. Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research. Cancer. 2004;101:1146–64.
- Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283:2701–11.
- Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. JID. 2004;189:930–7.
- Neill KM. Research subject advocate: A new protector of research participants. Accountability in Research. 2003;10:159–174.
- Green LA, White LL, Barry HC, et al. Infrastructure requirements for practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3 Suppl 1, S5–S11.
- Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: Working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3 Suppl 1: S12–20.
- Lanier D. Primary care practice-based research comes of age in the United States. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3 Suppl. 1: S2–S4.
- Wolf LE, Croughan M, Lo B. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research. Med Care. 2001:40:521–529.
- Pace WD, Staton EW, Holcomb S. Practice-based network studies in the age of HIPAA. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:S38–S45.
- Pace WD, Staton EW. Electronic data collection options for practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3 Suppl 1: S21–9.
- Flory J. Short Consent Forms: More with less? Paper presented at the Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research Human Research Participant Protection Conference, Boston, MA; Dec. 2005.