Justifying Predictions: Connecting Use of Educative Curriculum Materials to Students’ Engagement in Science Argumentation

References

• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A., Palincsar, A. S., & Davis, E. A. (2015). The design and use of educative curricular supports for text-based discussions in science. Journal of Education, 195(1), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Interacting with a suite of educative features: Elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 422–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., Marino, J.-C., Kademian, S. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 1504–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers’ knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92, 221–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reforms? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94, 765–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Fostering second graders’ scientific explanations: A beginning elementary teacher’s knowledge, beliefs, and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 381–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Using educative curriculum materials to support preservice elementary teachers’ curricular planning: A comparison between two different forms of support. Curriculum Inquiry, 39, 679–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., Delgado, C., Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). Investigating teacher learning supports in high school biology curricular programs to inform the design of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 977–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggers, M., Forbes, C. T., & Zangori, L. (2013). Elementary teachers’ curriculum design and pedagogical reasoning for supporting students’ comparison and evaluation of evidence-based explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 48–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bismack, A. S., Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2014). Connecting curriculum materials and teachers: Elementary science teachers’ enactment of a reform-based curricular unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 489–512.
   Google Scholar
• Bismack, A. S., Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2015). Seeking “trickle down”: Examining student work for evidence of teacher uptake of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 816–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Kulikowich, J. M., & Bravo, M. A. (2014). The effects of educative curriculum materials on teachers’ use of instructional strategies for English language learners in science and on student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1074–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 443–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 451–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Janssen, F. J. J. M., & Van Driel, J. H. (2016). Teachers and science curriculum materials: Where we are and where we need to go. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 127–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Marulis, L. M., & Iwashyna, S. (2014). Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 24–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, C., Land, T. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers’ knowledge. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 154–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, M., Smith, E. L., & Grueber, D. J. (2008). “A sketch is like a sentence”: Curriculum structures that support teaching epistemic practices of science. Science Education, 92, 608–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. (2009). Reasoning up and down a food chain: Using an assessment framework to investigate students’ middle knowledge. Science Education, 94(2), 259–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for teacher learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2014–2026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrenkohl, L. R., & Cornelius, L. (2013). Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 413–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Hand, B. (2015). An analysis of argumentation discourse patterns in elementary teachers’ science classroom discussions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996). Children’s ideas about ecology: 3 ideas found in children aged 5-16 about the interdependency of organisms. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-S., & Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 923–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S.-F., Lieu, S.-C., Chen, S., Huang, M.-T., & Chang, W.-H. (2012). Affording explicit-reflective science teaching by using an educative teachers’ guide. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 999–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511–544). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N. B., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S. E., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marco-Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). An exploration of teacher learning from an educative reform-oriented science curriculum: Case studies of teacher curriculum use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/tea.21340
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 793–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 416–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Resources Center. (2004a). Science technology and children ecosystems (2nd ed.). Burlington, NC: Carolina Biological Supply Company.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Resources Center. (2004b). Science technology and children electric circuits (2nd ed.). Burlington, NC: Carolina Biological Supply Company.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95, 627–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. R. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 883–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M. (2013). Opportunities for teacher learning during enactment of inquiry science curriculum materials: Exploring the potential for teacher educative materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 323–346.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. S., Smith, A. A., & Banilower, E. R. (2014). Situating beliefs in the theory of planned behavior: The development of the teacher beliefs about effective science teaching questionnaire. In C. M. Czerniak, R. Evans, J. A. Luft, & C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning (pp. 81–102). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), 141–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87, 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J. (2007). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2007). The uses of argument, updated edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trygstad, P., Smith, P. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2012, March). Assessment tools for studying the effect of educative curriculum materials. Presentation at the Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Department for Education. (2014). National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study ( No. DFE-00182-2013). London, UK: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 848–870). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of high psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. (1979). Routines in teacher planning. Theory Into Practice, 18(3), 163–169.
   Google Scholar