May I Have Your Attention: An Analysis of Teacher Responses During A Multi-Year Professional Learning Program

References

• Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 483–497. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)90002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 835–868. doi:10.1002/tea.10113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2006). Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1032–1038. doi:10.1021/ed083p1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). The nature and development of critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 477–493. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A. R. (2008). Factors influencing implementation of the science writing heuristic in two elementary classrooms. In B. Hand (Ed.), Science inquiry, Argument and language: The case for the science writing heuristic (pp. 37–54). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., Riel, M., & Vahey, P. (2005, April). Characterizing adaptive expertise in science teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., & Nix, S. E. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 215–231. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.695678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P., Driel, J. H. V., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358–376. doi:10.1002/sce.20428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, S. (1987). Critical pedagogy and the control of professional knowledge. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 7(2), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gunel, M., Hand, B., & McDermott, M. A. (2009). Writing for different audiences: Effects on high-school students’ conceptual understanding of biology. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 354–367. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, T., Burke, K. A., Mehta, A., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2014). Impact of guided-inquiry-based instruction with a writing and reflection emphasis on chemistry students’ critical thinking abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 32–38. doi:10.1021/ed500059r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52–S59. doi:10.1119/1.19520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Cavagnetto, A. R., Chen, Y. C., & Park, S. (2016). Moving past curricula and strategies: Language and the development of adaptive pedagogy for immersive learning environments. Research in Science Education, 46(2), 223–241. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-015-9499-1
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J., & Bintz, J. (2009). Negotiating science: The critical role of argument in student inquiry. New Hampshire, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L. A., Gunel, M., & Akkus, R. (2016). Aligning teaching to learning: A 3-year study examining the embedding of language and argumentation into elementary science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 847–863. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9622-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Shelley, M., Laugerman, M., Fostvedt, L., & Therrien, W. (2018). Improving critical thinking growth for disadvantaged groups within elementary school science: A randomized controlled trial using the Science Writing Heuristic approach. Science Education, 102, 693–710. doi:10.1002/sce.2018.102.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B. M. (2007). Science inquiry, argument and language: A case for the science writing heuristic. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Children development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenshell, L. M., & Hand, B. (2006). Writing‐to‐learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 261–289. doi:10.1080/09500690500336965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89, 140–165. doi:10.1002/sce.20013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). Using knowledge of change to guide staff development. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff Development for Education in the ‘90s (pp. 15–36). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, and evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345–359. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poock, J. R., Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2007). Science and education-chemical education research-using the Science Writing Heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students’ academic performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(8), 1371–1379. doi:10.1021/ed084p1371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1–51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498. doi:10.3102/00346543051004455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246–259. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739. doi:10.3102/0034654308330970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 63–89. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9031-6
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 121–137. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9411-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Hand, B., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J. F., Treagust, D. F., & Wallace, C. S. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar