Successful Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Supporting Science Teachers with a Systematic, Ongoing, Intentional Collaboration Between University Engineering and Science Teacher Education Faculty

References

• Barrett, M. S., Ballantyne, J., Harrison, S., & Temmerman, N. (2009). On building a community of practice: Reflective narratives of academic learning and growth. Reflective Practice, 10(4), 403–416. doi:10.1080/14623940903138233
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence‐based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. doi:10.1002/jee.v103.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2010). Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 61–84. doi:10.1353/rhe.2010.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 297–306. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Health, R. (2009). CIHR strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/40490.html
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (2003). Fostering the scholarship of teaching and learning through faculty learning communities. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14(2/3), 161–198.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (97), 5–23. doi:10.1002/tl.129
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2014). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 197–210. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9380-5
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & Lachapelle, C. P. (2014). Designing engineering experiences to engage all students. In Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 117–142). Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El Hussein, M., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., & Osuji, J. (2014). Using grounded theory as a method of inquiry: Advantages and disadvantages. The Qualitative Report, 19(27), 1–15. Retrieved from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss27/3
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Horizon 2020: The EU framework for research and innovation.  United Kingdom: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Washington, DC: Board of Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Hadorn, G. H., Pohl, C., & Bammer, G. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 431–452).  Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard University. (2006). Enhancing Science and Engineering at Harvard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hora, M. T., & Millar, S. B. (2012). A guide to building education partnerships: Navigating diverse cultural contexts to turn challenge into promise. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 36(4), 235–247. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9174-z
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Elrod, S. (2015). Implicit theories of change as a barrier to change on college campuses: An examination of STEM reform. The Review of Higher Education, 38(4), 479–506. doi:10.1353/rhe.2015.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (pp. 200–208). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. S., & Chavis, D. M. (2012). Cross‐case methodology: Bringing rigour to community and systems change research and evaluation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 428–438. doi:10.1002/casp.1131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, J., & Froyd, F. (2010). Chronological and ontological development of engineering education as a field of scientific inquiry. Second Meeting of the Committee on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/DBER_Lohmann_Froyd_October_Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McBee, D., & Leahey, E. (2016). New directions, new challenges: Trials and tribulations of interdisciplinary research. In S. Frickel, M. Albert, and B. Prainsack (Eds.), Investigating interdisciplinary collaboration: Theory and practice across disciplines (pp. 27–46). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, C. on F. I. R. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health, L. (2007). NIH launches interdisciplinary research consortia. Retrieved from https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-launches-interdisciplinary-research-consortia
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (2018). About the next generation science standards. Retrieved from https://ngss.nsta.org/About.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards, L. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. All standards, all students. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., McBee, D., Leahey, E., Downey, G. J., Feinstein, N. W., Kleinman, D. L., … Croissant, J. (2016). Investigating interdisciplinary collaboration: Theory and practice across disciplines. S. Frickel, M. Albert, and B. Prainsack (Eds.). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of I. and I. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washinton, DC. Retrieved from https://innovation.ed.gov/files/2016/09/AIR-STEM2026_Report_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, R. (2015). Investing in America’s future: Preparing students with STEM skills (White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Report). Washinton, DC. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_fact_sheet_2016_budget_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2011). Applications of case study design, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K. (2008). Models and modeling in engineering education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar