389
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparing Advanced Placement Physics Teachers Experiencing Physics-Focused Professional Development

ORCID Icon

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041
  • Abell, S. K., Park, M. A., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher-educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–93. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6
  • Aina, J., & Olanipekun, S. (2015). Review of teacher self-efficacy, pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and out-of-field teaching: Focusing on Nigerian teachers. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 80–85. doi:10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150403.15
  • American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2012). What we know: How teacher preparation affects student achievement. Retrieved from https://secure.aacte.org/apps/rl/res_get.php?fid=485&ref=rl
  • Anderson, M., & Freebody, K. (2012). Developing communities of praxis: Bridging the theory practice divide in teacher education. McGill Journal of Education, 47(3), 359–377. doi:10.7202/1014864ar
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New YorkNY, US: W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research, Inc.
  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers‘ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
  • Bertram, A., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teachers’ views on Cores and PaP-eRs as a framework for articulating and developing pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1027–1047. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9227-4
  • Blank, R. K., & de Las Alas, N. (2009). Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta-analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. L. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548–556). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher Preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. doi:10.3102/0162373709353129
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). U.S. department of labor, occupational outlook handbook, high school teachers. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-trainingandlibrary/high-school-teachers.html
  • Chang, H., Kohler, J. N., Ard, J. E., & Mathis, C. (2018). Examining reasons behind high school students‘ decisions to enroll in physics courses. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 2492–2497. doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.061113
  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigor, J. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(30), 655–681. Retrieved from http://jhr.uwpress.org/cgi/content/refs/45/3/6556.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
  • Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers‘ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
  • Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71. doi:10.1177/003172171109200616
  • Erlich, R. J., & Russ-Eft, D. F. (2011). Assessing student learning in academic advising using social cognitive theory. NACADA Journal, 31(2), 5–15.
  • Evans, R., Luft, J., Czerniak, C., & Pea, C. (Eds). (2014). The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
  • Findell, C. (2009). What differentiates expert teachers from others? Journal of Education, 188(2), 11–23. doi:10.1177/002205740818800203
  • Fletcher, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2011). Early career secondary science teachers: A longitudinal study of beliefs in relation to field experiences. Science Education, 95, 1124–1146. doi:10.1002/sce.v95.6
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 257–259). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hanushek, E. (2010). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economic of Education Review, 30, 466–479. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006
  • Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
  • Hashweh, M. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: Twenty-five years later. In C. J. Craig, P. C. Meijer, & J. Broeckmans (Eds.), From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: The evolution of a research community (pp. 115–140). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Hattie, J. (2011). Challenge of focusing education reform. The Australian, June 7. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/rethinking-education-the-challenge-of-focusingreform/story-fn8ex0p1-1226069556190
  • Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross‐classified model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 227–249. doi:10.1108/09578230910941066
  • Hill, H., (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan. 471–476.
  • Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 271–297. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4
  • Hodapp, T., Hehn, J., & Hein, W. (2009). Preparing high school physics teachers. Physics Today, 62(2), 40. doi:10.1063/1.3086101
  • Keller, M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. doi:10.1002/tea.v54.5
  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi:10.1080/03057260903142285
  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Eisner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(90), 90–106. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398
  • Lakshmanan, A., Heath, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534–551. doi:10.1002/tea.v48.5
  • Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Portraying PCK. Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 15–23). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mullhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320. doi:10.1080/09500690802187009
  • Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukora, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 153–166. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
  • MacIsaac, D., & Falconer, K. (2002). Reforming physics instruction via RTOP. The Physics Teacher, 40(8), 479–485. doi:10.1119/1.1526620
  • Meltzer, D. E., & Otero, V. K. (2015). A brief history of physics education in the United States. American Journal of Physics, 83(5), 447–458. doi:10.1119/1.4902397
  • Meltzer, D. E., Plisch, M., & Vokos, S. (2012). Transforming the preparation of physics teachers: A call to action: A report by the Task Force on Teacher Education in Physics (T-TEP). College Park, MD: American Physical Society. Retrieved from http://www.aps.org/about/governance/task-force/upload/ttep-synopsis.pdf
  • Meltzer, D. E., Plisch, M., & Vokos, S. (2013). The role of physics departments in high school teacher education. College Park, MD: American Physical Society.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaäna, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Publications & products search. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
  • National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13158.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new k-12 science education standards. Board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academies.
  • National Research Council. (2013). Adapting to a changing world: Challenges and opportunities in undergraduate physics education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/18312.
  • Nixon, R. S., Luft, J. A., & Ross, R. J. (2017). Prevalence and predictors of out-of-field teaching in the first five years. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1197–1218. doi:10.1002/tea.v54.9
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319. (2002).
  • Ogletree, G. L. (2007). The effect of fifth grade science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge on their decision-making and student learning outcomes on the concept of chemical change. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (AAI3313734).
  • Ogodo, J. A. (2017). Examining the influence of physics focused professional development on advanced placement physics teachers. The University of Alabama, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Ojose, B. (2012). Content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge of algebra teachers on certain mathematical axioms. International Education Studies, 5(4), 150–165. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n4p150
  • Okonlawon, A. (2010). Constructing a framework for teaching reaction stoichiometry using pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry, 19(2), 27–44.
  • Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). The lost promise of teacher professional development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 3–24. doi:10.1080/02619768.2010.534131
  • Otero, V., & Meltzer, D. E. (2017). The past and future of physics education reform. Physics Today, 70, 5, 50. doi:10.1063/PT.3.3555
  • Otero, V. K., & Meltzer, D. E. (2016). 100 years of attempts to transform physics education. The Physics Teacher, 54, 523. doi:10.1119/1.4967888
  • Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2010). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8
  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
  • Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Rushton, G. T., Rosengrant, D., Dewar, A., Shah, L., Ray, H. E., Sheppard, K., & Watanabe, B. (2017). Towards a high-quality high school workforce: A longitudinal, demographic analysis of U.S. public school physics teacher. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 020122. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020122
  • Sawada, D., & Piburn, M. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual. Phoenix: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
  • Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School of Science & Math, 102(6), 245. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
  • Sharplin, E. D. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experience of rural teachers inWestern Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97–110. doi:10.1080/00131881.2013.874160
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 433–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Steele, N. (2010). Three Characteristics of Effective Teachers. The National Association for Music Education, 28(2), 71–78.
  • Sunal, D. W., & Wright, E. L. (Eds.). (2006). Research in science education: Volume 2. The impact of state and national standards in K–12 science teaching. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Sunal, D., Dantzler, J., Sunal, C., Turner, D., Harrell, J. W., & Simon, M. (2016). The 21st century physics classroom: What students, teachers, and classroom. Jounal of School Science and Mathematics,116(3), 116–126.
  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, Technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 19–38. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9144-y
  • Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X11431010
  • Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates' general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952.
  • Wenning, C. J. (2011). Professional knowledge standards for physics teacher educators: Recommendations from the CeMaST Commission on NIPTE. Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(1), 2–7.
  • White, S., & Tesfaye, C. I. (2014). High school physics courses and enrollments: Results from the 2008-09 nationwide survey of high school physics teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/highschool3.professional development.
  • White, S., & Tyler, J. (2014). Who teaches high school physics? Results from the 2012-2013 nationwide survey of high school physics teachers. AIP Statistical Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/highschool3.professional development
  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.