Concept Mapping as a Mechanism for Assessing Science Teachers’ Cross-Disciplinary Field-Based Learning

References

• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Achieve. (2013). The next generation science standards. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008010
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A., Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher-student interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1211–1239. doi:10.1002/tea.v49.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, B., & Schmidt, N. (2010). Pedagogy, environmental education, and context: Promoting knowledge through concept mapping. In A. M. Bodzin, B. S. Klein, & S. Weaver (Eds.), The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education (pp. 235–254). New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology. A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536–553. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besterfield-Sacre, M., Gerchak, K., Lyons, M., Shuman, L. J., & Wolfe, H. (2004). Scoring concept maps: An integrated rubric for assessing engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 105–115. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A. M., Klein, B. S., & Weaver, S. (2010). The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Boshuizen, H. P. A., Bromme, R., & Gruber, H. (2004). Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2004). The design of learning environments. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (pp. 131–154). New York, NY: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & MacIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham, UK and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 291–318. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T., Chang, R.-B., & Lin, S.-C. (2005). A new assessment for computer-based concept mapping. Educational Technology and Society, 8(3), 138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesapeake Bay Foundation. (2012). Environmental literacy plans by state. Retrieved from http://bb.cbf.org/page.aspx?pid=924
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37, 916–937. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/tea.20157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C. M., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching (Vol. II, pp. 395–411). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, B. J., Shaw, C. R., Balistrieri, T., Glasenapp, K., & Piacentine, L. (1999). Concept maps: A strategy to teach and evaluate critical thinking. The Journal of Nursing Education, 38(1), 42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dansereau, D. F., & Holley, C. D. (1982). Development and evaluation of a text mapping strategy. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 537–554). Amserdam, NL: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, B. S., Maerten-Rivera, J., Rohrer, R. E., & Lee, O. (2014). Effectiveness of a curricular and professional development intervention at improving elementary teachers’ science content knowledge and student achievement outcomes: Year 1 Results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 635–658. doi:10.1002/tea.v51.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, M., & Worley, E. (2006). Teacher research experiences, partnerships with students, and teacher networks sustaining factors from professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10972-005-9000-5
   Google Scholar
• Enderle, P., Denzau, M., Roseler, K., Southerland, S. A., Granger, E., & Hughes, R. (2014). Examining the influence of RET’s on science teachers’ beliefs and practice. Science Education, 98, 1077–1108. doi:10.1002/sce.21127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2017). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, S. L., Hitt, A. M., & Gilman, C. (2015). Training master’s-level graduate students to use inquiry instruction to teach middle-level and high-school science concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 115(4), 155–167. doi:10.1111/ssm.2015.115.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Lubin, I. A., Slater, J. L., & Walden, S. E. (2013). Mapping changes in science teachers’ content knowledge: Concept maps and authentic professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 287–299. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9393-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhoe, D., Bullock, S., & Hayhoe, S. (2011). A kaleidoscope of understanding: Comparing real with random data, using binary choice items, to study preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of climate change. Weather Climate and Society, 3(4), 254–260. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00021.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herl, H. E., Baker, E. L., & Niemi, D. (1996). Construct validation of an approach to modeling cognitive structure of U.S. history knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 206–218. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9941206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M., Groulx, J., Bloom, M., & Weinburgh, M. H. (2011). Assessing efficacy through an outdoor professional development experience for in-service science teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, S., O’Rode, N., Terman, N., & Weissglass, J. (2007). Using concept maps to assess change in teachers’ understandings of algebra: A respectful approach. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(1), 23–41. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9025-0
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 25–29. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2901_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., & Wong, K. Y. (2014). Training on concept mapping skills in geometry. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2011). Physics teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Developing test scales and measuring the relation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of NARST, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2004). Revising instruction to teach Nature of Science. Science Teacher, 71(9), 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 889–909). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntylä, T., & Nousiainen, M. (2013). Consolidating pre-service physics teachers’ subject matter knowledge using didactical reconstructions. Science & Education, 23, 1583–1604. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9657-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475–492. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., Oh, H., & Cerar, N. I. (2011). Common features of professional development activities for mathematics and science teachers. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 571–589. doi:10.1080/19415257.2010.531597
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2015). Key characteristics of successful science learning: The promise of learning by modelling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 168–177. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9537-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle, B. (2013). Preparing high school students for the interdisciplinary nature of modern biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12, 144–147. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-03-0047
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/4962
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. doi:10.3102/00346543076003413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE). (2012). Environmental education materials: Guidelines for excellence. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937–949. doi:10.1002/tea.v27.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2005). Results and implications of a 12-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 35, 23–40. doi:10.1007/s11165-004-3431-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2004) The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, reflections, and ways forward. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., & Dharsey, N. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387. doi:10.1080/09500690802187025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569–600. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (1972). A process model for long-term memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 197–246). Oxford, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. H., & Hancock, M. P. (2007). Evaluation of the research experiences for teachers (RET) program: 2001-2006. Final Report from SRI International. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J., Landenberger, R., & Warner, T. A. (2012). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations. Journal of Science Education Technology, 22, 379–392. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9400-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauth-Nare, A. (2015). Influence of an intensive, field-based life science course on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for environmental science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 497–519. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9434-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Students’ use of web-based concept map testing and strategies for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 72–84. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.2001.00160.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., & Huang, C.-M. (2002). Exploring students' cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163–169. doi:10.1080/00219266.2002.9655827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 848–870). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wylen, D. G., Abdella, B. R., Dickinson, S. D., Engbrecht, J. J., & Vandiver, R. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: The right people, a supportive place, and a program emerges. CBE Life Science Education, 12(2), 140–143. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-01-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213–1230. doi:10.1080/0950069980201004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, T., & Huntley, M. (1998). Connecting mathematics and science in undergraduate teacher education programs: Faculty voices from the Maryland Collaborative for Teacher Preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 98(1), 19–25. doi:10.1111/ssm.1998.98.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Wojdak, J., Guinan, J., Wirgau, J., Kugler, C., Hammond, G., Small, C., … Baldwin, A. (2010). University facilities as real-world foci of multidisciplinary science learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39, 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yarden, H., Marbach-A., G., & Gershoni, J. M. (2004). Using the concept map technique in teaching introductory cell biology to college freshmen. Bioscene, 30(1), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Application of generalizability theory to concept map assessment research. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(3), 273–291. doi:10.1080/08957340802161840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar