250
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Learning to Plan Modeling-Based Investigations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Acher, A., & Arcà, M. (2020). Transformation Boxes: Epistemic supports for teaching and learning scientific modeling for biological core ideas [ Unpublished Manuscript].
  • Acher, A., Arcà, M., & Sanmartí, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91(1), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20196
  • Benedict-Chambers, A., & Aram, R. (2017). Tools for teacher noticing: Helping pre-service teachers notice and analyze student thinking and scientific practice use. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1302730
  • Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Guiding students towards sensemaking: Teacher questions focused on integrating scientific practices with science content. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 1977–2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674
  • Bennion, A., & Davis, E. A. (2022). Connecting the science practices to teaching and learning: Preservice elementary teachers’ professed and intended beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(6), 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2130258
  • Bennion, A., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2022). Novice elementary teachers’ knowledge of, beliefs about, and planning for the science practices: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2021311
  • Berland, L., & Crucet, K. (2016). Epistemological trade-offs: Accounting for context when evaluating epistemological sophistication of student engagement in scientific practices. Science Education, 100(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21196
  • Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2015). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
  • Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Developing pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical design capacity for reform-based curriculum design. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(3), 386–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00599.x
  • Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2022). Science practice-readiness: Novice elementary teachers’ developing knowledge of science practices. Science Education, 106(2), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21698
  • Campbell, T., & Fazio, X. (2020). Epistemic frames as an analytical framework for understanding the representation of scientific activity in a modeling-based learning unit. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2283–2304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9779-7
  • Campbell, T., Gray, R., & Fazio, X. (2019). Representing scientific activity: Affordances and constraints of central design and enactment features of a model-based inquiry unit. School Science and Mathematics, 119(8), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12375
  • Couso, D., & Garrido-Espeja, A. (2017). Models and modelling in pre-service teacher education: Why we need both. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research. Contributions from science education research (Vol. 3, pp. 245–261). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_19
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Davis, E. (2020). Approximations of practice: Scaffolding for pre-service teachers. In E. A. Davis, C. Zembal-Saul, & S. M. Kademian (Eds.), Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429426513
  • Davis, K. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10037
  • Davis, E., Palincsar, A. S., & Kademian, S. M. (2020). Designing a practice-based elementary teacher education program and supporting professional learning in science teaching. In E. A. Davis, C. Zembal-Saul, & S. M. Kademian (Eds.), Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning (pp. 187–203). Routledge.
  • Estapa, A. T., Amador, J., Kosko, K. W., Weston, T., de Araujo, Z., & Aming-Attai, R. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ articulated noticing through pedagogies of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(4), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9367-1
  • Fick, S., & Arias, A. M. (2020). An analysis of the roles played by tools provided to pre-service elementary science teachers. In E. Davis, C. Zembal-Saul, & S. M. Kademian (Eds.), Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning (pp. 129–144). Routledge.
  • Forbes, C. T., Lange-Schubert, K., Böschl, F., & Vo, T. (2019). Supporting primary students’ developing modeling competence for water systems. In A. Upmeier zu Belzen, D. Krüger, & J. van Driel (Eds.), Towards a competence-bases view on models and modeling in science education (pp. 257–273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_15
  • Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533800
  • Ghousseini, H., & Herbst, P. (2016). Pedagogies of practice and opportunities to learn about classroom mathematics discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9296-1
  • Giesecke, A., & Schork, N. (2015a). Grundbegriffe der Ökologie- Ökologie 1 [basic concepts of ecology- ecology 1][Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Yb3up2Iacs
  • Giesecke, A., & Schork, N. (2015b). Parasitismus- Ökologie 4 [Parasitism- Ecology 4][Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uagBeKYBBvI
  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  • Gouvea, J., & Passmore, C. (2017). ‘Models of’ versus ‘models for’: Toward an agent-based conception of modeling in the science classroom. Science and Education, 26(1–2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4
  • Green, J. L., & Kelly, G. J. (2019). How do we look at discourse. Definitions of sociolinguistic units. In J. L. Green & G. J. Kelly (Eds.), Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science teaching and engineering education (pp. 264–270). Routledge.
  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
  • Gunckel, K. L. (2013). Fulfilling multiple obligations: Pre-service elementary teachers’ use of an instructional model while learning to plan and teach science. Science Education, 97(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21041
  • Hernández, M. I., Couso, D., & Pintó, R. (2015). Analyzing students’ learning progressions throughout a teaching sequence on acoustic properties of materials with a model-based inquiry approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9503-y
  • Kademian, S. M., & Davis, E. A. (2018). Supporting beginning teacher planning of investigation-based science discussions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(8), 712–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1504266
  • Kademian, S. M., & Davis, E. A. (2020). Planning and enacting investigation-based science discussions: Designning tools to support teacher knowledge for science teaching. In E. A. Davis, C. Zembal-Saul, & S. M. Kademian (Eds.), Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning (pp. 113–128). Routledge.
  • Kang, H. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ learning to plan intellectually challenging tasks. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676313
  • Kapon, S. (2017). Unpacking sensemaking. Science Education, 101(1), 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21248
  • Karlström, M., & Hamza, K. (2019). Pre-service science teachers’ opportunities for learning through reflection when planning a microteaching unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1531345
  • Karlström, M., & Hamza, K. (2021). How do we teach planning to pre-service teachers–A tentative model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 664–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1875163
  • Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883:AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I
  • Kelly, G. J., & Cunningham, C. M. (2019). Epistemic tools in engineering design for K-12 education. Science Education, 103(4), 1080–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21513
  • Kenyon, L., Davis, E. A., & Hug, B. (2011). Design approaches to support pre-service teachers in scientific modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9225-9
  • Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2020). Students’ perceptions of socio-scientific issue-based learning and their appropriation of epistemic tools for systems thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1339–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1759843
  • Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Using epistemic considerations in teaching: Fostering students’ meaningful engagement in scientific modeling. In A. Upmeier zu Belzen, D. Krüger & J. van Driel (Eds.), Towards a competence-based view on models and modeling in science education (pp. 181–199). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_11
  • Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students’ meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
  • Kloser, M., & Windschitl, M. (2020). Response: Scaffolds, tools, and transitions toward disciplined improvisation. In E. A. Davis, C. Zembal-Saul, & S. M. Kademian (Eds.), Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning (pp. 178–186). Routledge.
  • Kuhn, D., Arvidsson, T. S., Lesperance, R., & Corprew, R. (2017). Can engaging in science practices promote deep understanding of them? Science Education, 101(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21263
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
  • Lewis, E., Dema, O., & Harshbarger, D. (2014). Preparation for practice: Elementary pre-service teachers learning and using scientific classroom discourse community instructional strategies. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12067
  • Lewontin, R. (2001). The triple helix: Gene, organism, and environment. Harvard University Press.
  • Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.628748
  • Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2015). Examining learning through modeling in K-6 science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9533-5
  • Louca, L. Τ., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2019). Toward an epistemology of modeling-based learning in early science education. In A. Upmeier zu Belzen, D. Krüger, & J. van Driel (Eds.), Towards a competence-based view on models and modeling in science education (pp. 237–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_14
  • Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21030
  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., Kelley-Petersen, M., Mikolasy, K., Thompson, J., Valencia, S. W., & Windschitl, M. (2014). Practice makes practice: Learning to teach in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.938997
  • Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education : Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
  • Ozcelik, A., & McDonald, S. P. (2019). Discourse of professional pedagogical vision in teacher education. In G. J. Kelly & J. L. Green (Eds.), Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science teaching and engineering education (pp. 181–205). Routledge.
  • Passmore, C., Schwarz, C., & Mankowski, J. (2017). Developing and using models. In C. V. Schwarz, C. Passmore, & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (pp. 109–134). National Science Teacher Association.
  • Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
  • Ricketts, A. (2014). Pre-service elementary teachers’ ideas about scientific practices. Science and Education, 23(10), 2119–2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9709-7
  • Ruppert, J., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2019). Disentangling the role of domain-specific knowledge in student modeling. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9656-9
  • Ryu, S., Han, Y., & Paik, S. H. (2015). Understanding co-development of conceptual and epistemic understanding through modeling practices with mobile internet. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 330–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9545-1
  • Schwarz, C., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2017). Moving beyond “knowing about” science to making sense of the world. In C. V. Schwarz, C. Passmore, & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (pp. 3–21). National Science Teacher Association.
  • Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
  • Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2019). Epistemic tools for science classrooms: The continual need to accommodate and adapt. Science Education, 103(4), 1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21510
  • Sezen-Barrie, A., Stapleton, M. K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2020). Science teachers’ sensemaking of the use of epistemic tools to scaffold students’ knowledge (re)construction in classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1058–1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21621
  • Shim, S. Y., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Framing negotiation: Dynamics of epistemological and positional framing in small groups during scientific modeling. Science Education, 102(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21306
  • Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
  • Téllez-Acosta, M. E. (2022). Supporting science pre-service elementary teachers in learning to plan modeling-based investigations [ Doctoral dissertation, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg]. https://opendata.uni-halle.de/bitstream/1981185920/94234/1/META%27s%20Dissertation%20Work_Online%20version.pdf
  • Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213476334
  • Vattam, S. S., Goel, A. K., Rugaber, S., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Gray, S., & Sinha, S. (2011). Understanding complex natural systems by articulating structure-behavior-function models. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 66–81.
  • Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: The impact of pre-service instruction on teachers’ understandings of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783–835. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004783
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 310–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177193
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2018). Planning for engagement with big science ideas. In M. Windschitl, J. Thompson, & M. Braaten (Eds.), Ambitious science teaching (pp. 19–38). Harvard Education Press.
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21027
  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5, 4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2016). Development of an empirically based learning performances framework for third-grade students’ model-based explanations about plant processes. Science Education, 100(6), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21238
  • Zembal-Saul, C. (2018). The role of teacher education in advancing reform in primary science education. In Y.-J. Lee & J. Tan (Eds.), Primary science education in East Asia: A critical comparison of systems and strategies (pp. 229–241). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97167-4_12

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.