The U.S. Landscape of Elementary Teachers’ Science Course Requirements

References

• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, B. (2005). A wake-up call for science faculty. Cell, 123(5), 739–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldegether, R. A. (2015). What every student should know: General education requirements in undergraduate education. World Journal of Education, 5(3), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n3p8
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2019). Levers for change: An assessment of progress on changing STEM instruction. American Assoication for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2019, June 10). What is the NGSS? And why is it important? [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJBN6BX04Ms
   Google Scholar
• Ardzejewska, K., McMaugh, A., & Coutts, P. (2010). Delivering the primary curriculum: The use of subject-specialist and generalist teachers in NSW. Issues in Educational Research, 20(3), 203–219.
   Google Scholar
• Backer, D. I., & Lewis, T. E. (2015). Retaking the test. Educational Studies, 51(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2015.1033524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weiss, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701344966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., Kafka, A., Pfitzner-Gatling, A., & Szymanski, E. (2005). The living earth: Inviting students into the world of scientific research through seismology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(6), 50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Buo, C., Brookover, M., Decker, G., Kindig, R., Duff, R. J., & Makki, N. (2021). Camp bioscience: Developing a biology summer camp for upper elementary students. The Journal of STEM Outreach, 4(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. N., Heddle, M. L., & Duran, E. (2011). Re-examining the similarities between teacher and student conceptions about physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9196-x
   Google Scholar
• Bursal, M. (2012). Changes in American preservice elementary teachers’ efficacy beliefs and anxieties during a science methods course. Science Education International, 23(1), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. S. (1987). Why do you ask? The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse [ Paper presented]. The meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, S. J. (2013). Elementary preservice teachers’ science vocabulary: Knowledge and application. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9270-7
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, A., Asselta, L., & Durkin, A. L. (2019). Exploring the relationship between science content knowledge and science teaching self-efficacy among elementary teachers. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), 2019. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.1.04
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
   Google Scholar
• Curran, M. (2020). Complex sentences in an elementary science curriculum: A research note. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analysing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, S. (2021). The impact of differentiated instructional media on the motivation and opinions of students towards science learning in terms of learning styles. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3723
   Google Scholar
• Dewitt, T. (2013, February 9). Hey science teachers-make it fun [Video] Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OaIdwUdSxE
   Google Scholar
• Doucette, D. (2017, March). Teaching science: We’re doing it wrong [Video]. TED Conferences. http://tedxriga.com/teaching-science-wrong/
   Google Scholar
• Fillis, A., & Fouts, J. (2001). Interdisciplinary curriculum: The research base: The decision to approach music curriculum from an interdisciplinary perspective should include a consideration of all the possible benefits and drawbacks. Music Education Journal, 87(22), 22–26, 68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399704
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., Sabel, J. L., & Zangori, L. (2015). Integrating life science content and instructional methods in elementary teacher education. The American Biology Teacher, 77(9), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt2015.77.9.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. J., Fifield, S., Madsen, J., & Qian, X. (2013). The science semester: Cross-disciplinary inquiry for prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 1049–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9326-8
   Google Scholar
• Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 3(3), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397
   Google Scholar
• Guziec, M. K., & Lawson, H. (2004). Science for elementary educators: Modeling science instruction for childhood education majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(5), 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasni, A., & Potvin, P. (2015). Students’ interest in science and technology and its relationships with teaching methods, family context and self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 337–366.
   Google Scholar
• Haverly, C., Lyle, A., Spillane, J. P., Davis, E. A., & Peurach, D. J. (2022). Leading instructional improvement in elementary science: State science coordinators’ sense-making about the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9), 1575–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impey, C., Buxner, S., Antonellis, J., Johnson, E., & King, C. (2011). A twenty-year survey of science literacy among college undergraduates. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262x.2023.2238222
   Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). A conflict in your head: An exploration of trainee science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development and its impact on teacher self-confidence. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1529–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802226062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<89:AID-SCE10>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirst, S., & Flood, T. (2017). Connecting science content and science methods for preservice elementary teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_05_49
   Google Scholar
• Koppich, J. (2010). Teacher unions and new forms of teacher compensation: Engaging teacher unions in the substantive work of redesigning teacher pay is an essential precondition to making progress. Phi Delta Kappan (May), 91(8), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009100805
   Google Scholar
• Krall, R., Lott, K. H., & Wymer, C. L. (2009). Inservice elementary and middle school teachers’ conceptions of photosynthesis and respiration. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9117-4
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, D. D., & Morris, J. D. (2005). Predicting scientific understanding of prospective elementary teachers: Role of gender, education level, courses in science, and attitudes toward science and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(4), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-8083-2
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Glass, B. (2019). Developing the next generation of elementary science teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst19_049_02_18
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luera, G. R., Moyer, R. H., & Everett, S. A. (2005). What type and level of science content knowledge of elementary education students affect their ability to construct an inquiry-based science lesson? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174670
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J., Navy, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.980559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markworth, K. A., Brobst, J., Ohana, C., & Parker, R. (2016). Elementary content specialization: Models, affordances, and constraints. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0049-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McConnell, T. J., Parker, J. M., & Eberhardt, J. (2013). Assessing teachers’ science content knowledge: A strategy for assessing depth of understanding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(4), 717–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9342-3
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting deep learning through project-based learning: A design problem. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). Framework for K-12 science education. National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id-13165
   Google Scholar
• National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. (2018). http://horizon-research.com/NSSME/2018-nssme
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. (2001). Subject content knowledge and teacher talk in the primary science classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760220128914
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760220128914
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding; the complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802186993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2012). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9303-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. (2014). Organic chemistry in action! developing an intervention program for introductory organic chemistry to improve learners’ understanding, interest, and attitudes. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(7), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400538p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojo, O. O., Akintomide, A. G., & Ehindero, S. A. (2012). Primary school teachers’ comfortability with generalized teaching in public schools in Osun State, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 2(1), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n1p145
   Google Scholar
• Ozden, M. (2008). The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching phases of matters. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 8, 611–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_9
   Google Scholar
• Oztay, E. S., & Boz, Y. (2021). Interaction between pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge in electrochemistry. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2022.165
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, W. A. (2021, December). From 1871 to 2021: A short history of education in the United States. Suny.buffalostate.edu. The State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Reys, B. J., & Fennell, F. (2003). Who should lead mathematics instruction at the elementary school level? A case for mathematics specialists. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(5), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.9.5.0277
   Google Scholar
• Ritt, M. (2016). The impact of high-stakes testing on the learning environment. Social work master’s clinical research papers. https://ir.stthomas.edu/ssw_mstrp/669
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Teacher education does not exist. Stanford Educator, 7. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10857-006-9007-7
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. K., & Guess-Newsome, J. G. (2004). Elementary science methods courses and the national science education standards: Are we adequately preparing teachers? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000044867.21773.7c
   Google Scholar
• Steele, M. D., & Hillen, A. F. (2012). The content-focused methods course: A model for integrated pedagogy and mathematics content. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.1.0053
   Google Scholar
• STEM Smart Brief. (2023). Succesfulstemeducation.org.
   Google Scholar
• Trygstad, P. J. (2013). 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science. Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Usak, M. (2009). Preservice science and technology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on cell topics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimlerim, 9(4), 2033–2046.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, D. B., & Koeppel, K. K. (2009). General education requirements: A comparative analysis. The general education requirements: A comparative analysis. The Journal of General Education, 58(4), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/25702446
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. E., Basile, C. G., & Albright, L. (2011). The effect of an experiential learning program on middle school students’ motivation toward mathematics and science. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 35(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2011.11462086
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Vision for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015129825891
   Google Scholar
• Zinger, D., Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (2020). Teaching science in rural elementary schools: Affordances and constraints in the age of NGSS. The Rural Educator, 41(2), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v41i2.558
   Google Scholar