Economic Benefits of Improvements in Visibility: Acid Rain Provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

REFERENCES

• Chestnut, L.G.; Rowe, R.D. Economic Valuation of Changes in Visibility: A State of the Science Assessment for NAPAP, Acidic Deposition: State of Science and Technology Report 27; Brown, G.M. Jr., Callaway, J.M., Eds.; National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program: Washington, DC, October 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.C.; Carson, R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, John Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method; Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S., Schulze, W.D., Eds.; Rowman and Allanheld: Totowa, NJ, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B.; Furby, L. “Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility,” J. Risk and Uncertainty 1988,1, 147–184.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, G.; Schulze, W.; Waldman, D.; et al. Valuing Eastern Visibility: A Field Test of the Contingent Valuation (Draft), Cooperative Agreement #CR-815183-01-3, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Tolley, G.A.; Randall, A.; Blomquist, G.; et al. Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in Eastern United States, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, D. Benefits of Improving Visual Air Quality in Cincinnati: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey, Project 1742, Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, May 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, J.; Schenk, D.; McClelland, G. “Urban visibility values: Some experiments in the use of the contingent valuation method,” in Visibility and Fine Particles; C.V. Mathai, Ed.; Transactions of the Air and Waste Management Association Specialty Conference on Visibility and Fine Particles, Air and Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T.; Mitchell, R.C.; Ruud, P.A. “Valuing air quality improvements: simulating a hedonic pricing equation in the context of a contingent valuation scenario,” in Visibility and Fine Particles; C.V. Mathai, Ed.; Transactions of the Air and Waste Management Association Specialty Conference on Visibility and Fine Particles, Air & Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, D.; d’Arge, R.; Schulze, W.; Thayer, M. Methods Development for Assessing Air Pollution Control Benefits. Volume 2: Experiments in Valuing Nonmarket Goods. A Case Study of Alternative Benefit Measures of Air Pollution Control in the South Coast Air Basin of Southern California, EPA-600/6-79-0016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, February, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• 11. Chestnut, L.G.; Rowe, R.D. Preservation Values for Visibility Protection at the National Parks, Cooperative Agreement #CR-813-686, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle, NC, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• 12. Schulze, W.D.; Brookshire, D.S.; Waltham, E.G.; et al. “The benefits of preserving visibility in the national parklands of the Southwest,” Natural Resources Journal 1983, 23, 149–173.
   Google Scholar
• 13. ICF Resources, Inc., Economic Analysis of the Title IV Requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Acid Rain Division, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• 14. Dennis, R.L.; McHenry, J.N.; Barchet, W.R.; et al. “Correcting RADM’s sulfate underprediction: Discovery and correction of model errors and testing the corrections through comparisons against field data,” Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A:975–997.
   Google Scholar
• 15. Husar, R. User’s Guide: Visibility Module which Converts Aerosol Concentration to Visibility Parameters: An Empirical Relationship for Calculating Visibility Distance from Particle Concentrations Calculated by Regional Models. Internal Report.
   Google Scholar
• 16. Sisler, J.F.; Huffman, D.; Latimer, D.A., et al. Spatial and Temporal Patterns and the Chemical Composition of the Haze in the United States: An Analysis of Data from the IMPROVE Network, 1988-1991, ISSN No. 0737–5352–26, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Loehman, E.; Boldt, D.; Chaikin, K. Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvements in the San Francisco Bay Area. Part I: Study Design and Property Value Study. Draft Final Report, SRI International: Menlo Park, CA, September 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Trijonis, J.C.; Thayer, M.; Murdoch, J.; Hagemann, R. Air Quality Benefits Analysis for Los Angeles and San Francisco Based on Housing Values and Visibility, California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, 1984.
   Google Scholar