A Maximum Entropy Approach to Estimating Emissions

REFERENCES

• Anex, R.P.; Lund, J.R.; Grant, R. Final Report: Industrial Surface Coatings-Wood Furniture and Fixtures Emission Inventory Development, Prepared for the California Air Resource Board; October 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bevington, P.R.; Robinson, D.K. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1992; pp. 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hamed, M.M.; Bedient, P.B. “On the effect of probability distributions of input variables in public health risk assessment,” Risk Anal. 1997, 17, 97-105.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, C. “Importance of distributional form in characterizing inputs to Monte Carlo risk assessments,” Risk Anal. 1997, 17, 107-113.
   Google Scholar
• Bukowski, J.; Korn, L.; Wartenberg, D. “Correlated inputs in quantitative risk assessment: the effects of distributional shape,” Risk Anal. 1995, 15, 215-219.
   Google Scholar
• Lenox, M.J.; Haimes, Y.Y. “The constrained extremal distribution selection method,” Risk Anal. 1996, 16, 161-176.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, J.; Matalas, J.; Ling, C.; Haimes, Y.; Li, D. “Selection of probability distributions in characterizing risk of extreme events,” Risk Anal. 1996, 14, 61-72.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, F.A.; Alvarez, J.L. “On the selection of distributions for stochastic variables,” Risk Anal. 1996, 16, 5-18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferson, S.; Moore, D.R.J. Six Methods to Use When Information Is Limited (as It Always Is). In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis; Society for Risk Analysis: McLean, VA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C.E. The mathematical theory of communication. In The Mathematical Theory of Communication; Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W., Eds.; Univ. of Illinois: Urbana, IL,1949.
   Google Scholar
• Jaynes, E.T. “Information theory and statistical mechanics,” Phys. Rev. 1957, 106, 620–630.
   Google Scholar
• Tribus, M. Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs; Pergamon: New York, 1969; pp. 120–148.
   Google Scholar
• Englehardt, J.D.; Lund, J.R. “Information theory in risk analysis,” J. Environ. Eng. 1993, 118, 890–904.
   Google Scholar
• Englehardt, J.D. “Predicting incident size from limited information,” J. Environ. Eng. 1995, 121, 455–464.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, A.; Judge, G.; Karp, L. “A maximum entropy approach to estimation and inference in dynamic models or counting fish in the sea using maximum entropy,” J. Econ. Dynamics and Control 1996, 20, 559–582.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer and Commercial Products, Volume 2: Comprehensive Emissions Inventory; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. County Business Patterns 1993: California; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993; CBP–93–6.
   Google Scholar
• State of California Air Resources Board (CARB). Survey ofPaint and Other Manufacturers Industries; Stationary Source Division, CARB: Sacramento, CA, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• State of California Air Resources Board. Methods for Assessing Area Source Emissions in California; CARB: Sacramento, CA, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Survey of Wood Coating Facilities. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G.E.P.; Tiao, G.C. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis; Addison- Wesley: Reading, PA, 1973; p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F.P. The Foundation of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays; Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L.J. The Foundations of Statistics; 2nd rev. ed.; Dover: New York, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Law, A.M.; Kelton, W.D. Simulation, Modeling and Analysis; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991; p. 465.
   Google Scholar