PM Fine Standards and Implied Modeling/Analysis Needs

REFERENCES

• Spatial and Seasonal Patterns and Long Term Variability of the Composition of the Haze in the United States: An Analysis of Data from the IMPROVE Network; Sisler, J.F., Ed.; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Air Quality Management Plan (draft); South Coast Air Quality Management District: Diamond Bar, CA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W.J. Implementation of Revised Air Quality Standards for Ozone and Particulate Matter. Memorandum to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; July 16, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Air Quality Surveillance for Particulate Matter, Network Design. Fed. Regist. 1997; Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 58, Appendix D.
   Google Scholar
• Guidance on Use of Modeled Results to Demonstrate Attainment of the Ozone NAAQS; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1996; EPA-454/B–95–007.
   Google Scholar
• National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. Fed. Regist. 1997 62 (138), 38761.
   Google Scholar
• Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Speciation Guidance; Draft report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web site. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ amtic/pmspec.html (accessed 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A.G. The Modeling Process and Emissions Inventories: Their Development, Availability, Evaluation, Use and Limitations; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web site. http://www.epa.gov/ttn (accessed 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Demerjian, K.L.; Chang, J.; Donahue, N.; Hidy, G.; Reynolds, S.; Roth, P.; Trainer, M. Peer Review Panel Report; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Source Attribution Workshop: Research Triangle Park, NC; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web site. http://www.epa.gov/ttn (accessed 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Robinson, N.F.; Chow, J.C.; Henry, R.C.; Kim, B.M.; Pace, T.G.; Meyer, E.L.; Nguyen, Q. “The USEPA/DRI Chemcial Mass Balance Receptor Model, CMB7.0,” Environ. Software 1990 5, 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C.; Lewis, C.W.; Collins, J.F. “Vehicle-related hydrocarbon source compositions from ambient data: The GRACE/SAFER Method,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994 28, 823–832.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, P.M.; Blanchard, C.L.; Tanenbaum, S.J. Development of an Observation-Driven Methodology for Qualitatively Characterizing the Response of Secondary Aerosol to Changes in Emissions of Ammonia, Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxides; Final report prepared for the American Petroleum Institute; Envair, Inc.: Albany, CA, September 30, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schiermeier, F.A. 'Regulatory' Version of Models-3. Memorandum to Joseph A. Tikvart; October 17, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Guideline for Regulatory Application of the Urban Airshed Model; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1991; EPA-450/4-91–013.
   Google Scholar
• The Emissions Modeling System (EMS-95) User's Guide; Alpine Geophysics: Boulder, CO, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Procedures for Preparing Emissions Projections; Draft report; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, G.A.; Dudhia, J.; Stauffer, D.R. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (jiM5); NCAR/TN-398+STR; NCAR: Boulder, CO, 1994.
   Google Scholar