Development of the Relationship between Odor Intensity and Threshold Dilution Ratio for Swine Units

REFERENCES

• Misselbrook, T.H.; Clarkson, C.R.; Pain, B.F. “Relationship between concentration and intensity of odor from pig slurry and broiler houses,” J. Agricultural Eng. Res. 1993, 55, 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• House Bill 85, 1997; General Assembly of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Amendment to Swine Farm Laws, Senate Bill 478, 1997; General Assembly of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• House File 519, 1995; Iowa General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• House File 2184, 1996; Iowa General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Livestock Waste Regulations. Title 35, Part 506; Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.; Bundy, D.S.; Hoff, S.J. “Using olfactometry to measure intensity and threshold dilution ratio for evaluating swine odor,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 1999, 49(7), 847–853.
   Google Scholar
• Soble, A.T. “Olfactory measurement of animal manure odor,” Transactions of the ASAE 1972, 15(3), 696–699.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardos, G. Odor Sampling and Analysis. In Handbook of Air Pollution Technology; Calvert, S., Englund, H.M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, C.R.; Misselbrook, T.H. Odor Emissions from Broiler Chickens. In Odor and Ammonia Emissions from Livestock Farming; Nielsen, V.C., Voorburg, J.H., L'Hermite, P., Eds.; Elsevier Applied Science: New York, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. “Standard terminology relating to sensory evaluation of materials and products,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards 1991, 15.07: E253-91a.
   Google Scholar
• Prokop, W.H. Odors. In Air Pollution Engineering Manual; Buonicore, A.J., Davis, W., Eds.; Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M.A.. Odor Panel Selection, Training and Utilization Procedures—A Key Component in Odor Research. In Transactions: Recent Developments and Current Practices in Odor Regulations, Controls and Technology; Derenzo, D.R., Gnyp, A., Eds; Air & Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S.S.. “On the psychophysical law,” Psychophysical Rev. 1957, 64, 153-181.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, W.S.; Moskowitz, H.R. Psychophysical Scaling of Odors. In Human Responses to Environmental Odors; Turk, A., Johnston, J.W., Jr., Moulton, D.G., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1974; pp 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S.S. “The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics,” Amer. Psychologist 1962, 17, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lipetz, L.E. The Relation of Physiological and Psychological Aspects of Sensory Intensity. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology; Loewenstein, W.R, Ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1971; pp 191–225.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, H.; Oliver, S.M. “Beidler's theory and human taste stimulation,” Perception and Psychophysics 1966, 1(10), 358–360.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, A. “Expression of gaseous concentration and dilution ratios,” Atmos. Environ. 1973, 7, 967–972.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, J.J. “Report on proposed odor terminology, TT-4 Odor Committee,” In: State-of-the-Art of Odor Control Technology II; Pittsburgh: The Air Pollution Control Association, 1977, pp 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J.V.; Arnold, K.J. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kutner, M.H. Applied Linear Regression Models; Richard D. Irwin: Homewood, IL, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, A.; Switala, E.D.; Thomas, S.H. “Suprathreshold odor measurements by dynamic olfactometry: principles and practice,” J. Air Pollution Control Assoc. 1980, 30 (12), 1289–1294.
   Google Scholar