Estimates of Particle Hygroscopicity during the Southeastern Aerosol and Visibility Study

REFERENCES

• Malm, W.C.; Sisler, J.F.; Huffman, D.; Eldred, R.A.; Cahill, T.A. “Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States,” J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99(D1), 1347–1370.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, R.B.; Hand, J.L.; Kreidenweis, S.M.; Day, D.E.; Malm, W.C. “Optical measurements of aerosol size distributions in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Dry aerosol characterization,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.J.; Boatman, J.F. “Size calibration corrections for the Active Scattering Aerosol Spectrometer Probe (ASASP-100X),” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1990, 12, 665–672.
   Google Scholar
• Stelson, A.W. “Urban aerosol refractive index prediction by partial molar refraction approach,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 1676–1679.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, D.E.; Kreidenweis, S.M.; McKee, T. The Influence of Synoptic and Local Meteorology Conditions on Ambient Particle Concentrations during the Southeastern Aerosol and Visibility Study (SEAVS); CIRA Report.; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, 1997; ISSN 07375352–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, H.; Dzubay, T.G. “Apportioning light extinction coefficients to chemical species in atmospheric aerosol,” Atmos. Environ. 1983, 17(8), 1573–1581.
   Google Scholar
• Ouimette, J.R.; Flagan, R.C. “The extinction coefficient of multicom-ponent aerosols,” Atmos. Environ. 1982, 16(10), 2405–2419.
   Google Scholar
• Shettle, E.P.; Fenn, R.W. Models for the Aerosols ofthe Lower Atmosphere and the Effects of Humidity Variations on their Optical Properties; Environ. Res. Pap. 676; AFGL: Massachusetts, 1979; AFGL-TR–79–0214.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, I.N.; Munkelwitz, H.R. “Water activities, densities, and refractive indices of aqueous sulfates and sodium nitrate droplets of atmospheric importance,” J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99(D9), 18801–18808.
   Google Scholar
• Nemesure, S.; Wagener, R.; Schwartz, S.E. “Direct shortwave forcing of climate by the anthropogenic sulfate aerosol: Sensitivity to particle size, composition, and relative humidity,” J. Geophys. Res. 1995, 100(D12), 26105–26116.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.P.; Pun, B. K.-L.; Chan, C.K.; Flagan, R.C.; Seinfeld, J.H. “Atmospheric gas-aerosol equilibrium, I: Thermodynamic model,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1994, 20, 275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Kreidenweis, S.M.; Seinfeld, J.H. “Nucleation of sulfuric acid-water and methanesulfonic acid-water solution particles: Implications for the atmospheric chemistry of organosulfur species,” Atmos. Environ. 1988, 22(2), 283–296.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, R.B.; Kreidenweis, S.M. Optical Measurements of Aerosol Size Distributions in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Particle Hygroscopic-ity and Its Impact on Visibility; CIRA Report; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, 1996; ISSN 0737-5352–33.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, P.; Hildemann, L.M.; McMurry, P.H.; Seinfeld, J.H. “Organics alter hygroscopic behavior of atmospheric particles,” J. Geophys. Res. 1995, 100(D9), 18755–18770.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, D.M.; Pinnick, R.G. “Response characteristics of the Particle Measuring Systems Active Scattering Aerosol Spectrometer Probe (ASASP-X),” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1983, 2, 477–488.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.J. “Response of the Active Scattering Aerosol Spectrometer Probe (ASASP-100X) to different chemical composition,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1995, 22, 33–42.
   Google Scholar