Exposure Efficiency: Concept and Application to Perchloroethylene Exposure from Dry Cleaners

REFERENCES

• Harrison, K.; Hattis, D.; Abbat, K. Implications of Chemical Use for Exposure Assessment: Development of an Exposure-Estimation Methodology for Application in a Use Clustered Priority Setting System; Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Report No. CTPID 86-2; MIT Center for Technology Policy and Industrial Development: Cambridge, MA, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, F.A.; Hanna, S.R. Modelling Urban Air Pollution; Atmos. Environ. 1972, 7, 131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K.R. Fuel Combustion, Air Pollution Exposure, and Health: The Situation in Developing Countries; Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 1993, 18, 529–566.
   Google Scholar
• Scheringer, M. Persistence and Spatial Range of Endpoints of an Exposure-Based Assessment of Organic Chemicals; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 1652–1659.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliet, O.; Crettaz, P. Critical Surface-Time 95: A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology including Fate and Exposure; Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; Institute of Soil and Water Management: Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hertwich, E.; McKone, T.; Pease, W. A Systematic Uncertainty Analysis of an Evaluative Fate and Exposure Model; Risk Anal., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, A.C.K.; Thatcher, T.L.; Nazaroff, W.W. Inhalation Transfer Factors for Health-Risk Assessment; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1688–1699.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S.; Kanchanasak, P.; Levy, J.; Smith, K.; Evans, J.S. Exposure Efficiency: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Atmos. Environ., in press.
   Google Scholar
• HEM II User's Guide; EPA/450/V-91-001-0; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K.M.; Evans, J.S. The Value of Improved National Exposure Information for Perchloroethylene (Perc): A Case Study for Dry Cleaners; Risk Anal. 1997, 17, 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Turekian, K.K.; Nozaki, Y.; Benniger, L.K. Geochemistry of Atmospheric Radon and Radon Products; Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 1977, 5, 227255.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J.C.L.; Blake, D.R.; Rowland, F.S. Seasonal Variations in the Atmospheric Distributions of a Reactive Chlorine Compound, Tetrachloroethene (CCl2 = CCl2); Geophys. Res. Lett. 1995, 22 (9), 10971100.
   Google Scholar
• McKone, T.E.; Bogen, K.T. Uncertainties in Health-Risk Assessment: An Integrated Case Study Based on Tetrachloroethylene in California Groundwater; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1992, 15, 86–193.
   Google Scholar
• Hattis, D.; Goble, R. Expected Values for Projected Cancer Risks from Putative Genetically Acting Agents; Risk Anal. 1991, 11, 359–363.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, T.A., Jr. More Accurate Dose-Response Estimation Using Monte-Carlo Uncertainty Analysis: The Data Cube Approach; Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 1996, 2 (1), 150–174.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J.S.; Gray, G.M.; Sielken, R.L., Jr.; Smith, A.E.; Valdez-Flores, C.; Graham, J.D. Use of Probabilistic Expert Judgment in Uncertainty Analysis of Carcinogenic Potency; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1994, 20, 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, A.M.; Evans, J.S. Evaluating the Benefits of Uncertainty Reduction in Environmental Health Risk Management; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1987, 37, 1164–1171.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, J.K.; Cave, J.A.K. Research Planning for Food Safety: A Value of Information Approach; R-3946-ASPE/NCTR; Rand Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, 1991.
   Google Scholar