Flue Gas Desulfurization: The State of the Art

REFERENCES

• 1997 Compliance Report, Acid Rain Program; EPA-430/R-98-012 (NTIS PB99-122152); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Acid Rain Division: Washington, DC, August 1998; http://www.epa.gov/acidrain/cmprpt97/cr1997.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Evaluation of Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems; EPRI GS-7193; Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, February 1991.
   Google Scholar
• CoalPower3; International Energy Agency, The Clean Coal Centre: London, May 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Electric Utility Engineer's FGD Manual, Vol. I—FGD Process Design; DE-FG22-95PC94256-99; U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy: Morgantown, WV, March 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, R.E. Prospects for Inhibited Oxidation FGD Systems. In Proceedings of1993 SO2 Control Symposium, Vol. 3: Sessions 5B, 6A, and 6B; EPA-600/R-95-015c (NTIS PB95-179248); Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, February 1995; pp 53-1-53–21.
   Google Scholar
• Soud, H.N. Developments in FGD; IEA Coal Research: London, March 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K.; Babu, M.; Goetz, E. Review of 18 Months of Thioclear FGD Operation at AES Beaver Valley Cogeneration. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium: Vol. 1: SO2 Controls; EPRI TR-113187-V1; Atlanta, GA, August 1999; pp 3-45-3–59.
   Google Scholar
• Flue Gas Desulfurization by Seawater Scrubbing; ABB Environmental Information No. 727; Staines, United Kingdom, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. Use of Seawater as Makeup Water for Wet Flue Gas De-sulfurization Systems. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: The Mega Symposium; Vol. 1: SO2 Controls; EPRI TR-113187-V1; Atlanta, GA, August 1999; pp 3-83-3–91.
   Google Scholar
• Palazzolo, M.A.; Kelly, M.E.; Brna, T.G. Current Status of Dry SO2 Control Systems. In Proceedings of Eighth Symposium on Flue Gas De-sulfurization, Vol. 2, New Orleans, LA; EPA-600/9-84-017b (NTIS PB84-226646); Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, November 1983; pp 628–649.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J.A.; Kramlich, J.C.; Seeker, W.R.; Heap, M.P. Activation and Reactivity of Calcareous Sorbents toward Sulfur Dioxide; Env. Sci. Technol. 1985, 19, 1065.
   Google Scholar
• Kenakkala, T.; Valimaki, E. Status of the LIFAC SO2 and NOx Removal Process. In Proceedings of First Combined FGD and Dry SO2 Control Symposium, Vol. 1; EPA-600/9-89-036a (NTIS PB89-172159); Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, March 1989; pp 4-51-4–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, S.J.; Roman, V.; Offen, G.R. Hydrate and Process Parameters Controlling SO2 Removal during Hydroxide Injection near 1000 °F. In Proceedings of First Combined FGD and Dry SO2 Control Symposium, Vol. 3; EPA-600/9-89-036c (NTIS PB89-172175); Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, March 1989; pp 8-156-8–176.
   Google Scholar
• Babu, M.; Demian, A.; Drummond, C.J.; Henzel, D.S.; Kanary, D.A.; Kerivan, D.; Lee, K.; Murphy, K.R.; Newman, J.T.; Samuel, E.A.; et al. Duct Injection Technologies for SO2 Control. In Proceedings of First Combined FGD and Dry SO2 Control Symposium, Vol. 3; Drummond, C.J., Ed.; EPA-600/9-89-036c (NTIS PB89-172175); Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, March 1989; pp 8-24-8–74.
   Google Scholar
• Jozewicz, W.; Hall, B.W.; Singer, C.; Sedman, C.B. ADVACATE—Low-Cost Process for SO2 Control. Presented at the International Symposium on Environmental Contamination in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest, Hungary, October 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K.R.; Shilling, N.Z.; Pennline, H.W. Status of DOE/GEESI InDuct Pilot Study; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1986, 36, 853.
   Google Scholar
• Helfritch, D.J.; Murphy, P.L.; Waugh, E.G. The Pilot-Scale Testing of a Circulating Fluid Bed for Mercury Adsorption and Particle Agglomeration. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium; Vol. 3; Particulate Controls, Air Toxics Control, and Poster Sessions Research; TR-113187-V3; Atlanta, GA, August 1999; pp 19-17-19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Babu, M. Carmeuse Chimie Minerale. Personal communication, December 5, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jozewicz, W.; Singer, C.; Srivastava, R.K.; Tsirigotis, P.E. Status of SO2 Scrubbing Technologies. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium; Vol. 1; SO2 Controls; TR-113187-V1; Atlanta, GA, August 1999; pp 1-1-1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Klingspor, J.S.; Brogren, C. LS-2, Two Years of Operating Experience. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium: The Mega Symposium; SO2 Control Technologies and Continuous Emission Monitors; TR-108683-V2; Washington, DC, August 1997.
   Google Scholar
• The Effects of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities: An Update; U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Brockman, W.; Hartmann, D.; Lani, B.; Schrock, M.; Babu, M.; Benson, L. Concept Development, Pilot Testing, and Design Leading to Conversion of the Wm. H. Zimmer FGD System to Bleed Stream Oxidation. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium; Vol. 1; SO2 Controls; EPRI TR-113187-V1; Atlanta, GA, August 1999; pp 3-31-3–44.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, R.K. ControllingSO2Emissions: A Review of Technologies; EPA- 600/R-00-093 (NTIS PB2001-101224); National Risk Management Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, October 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Technical Assessment Guide, Vol. 1: Electricity Supply-1993 (Revision 7); EPRI TR-102276s; Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, 1993; Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Keeth, R.; Blagg, R.; Burklin, C.; Kosmicki, B.; Rhodes, D.; Waddell, T. Coal Utility Environmental Cost (CUECost) Workbook User's Manual, Version 1.0; EPA-600/R-99-056 (NTIS PB99-151938); National Risk Management Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, June 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Keeth, R.; Ireland, P.A.; Radcliffe, P. Utility Response to Phase I and Phase II Acid Rain Legislation—An Economic Analysis. In Proceedings of 1995 SO2 Control Symposium, Book 1, Sessions 1, 2, 3; Miami, FL, March 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Steam-Electric Plant Operation and Design; Report, Form EIA-767, 1991 through 1995, Browser for Windows; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Smolenski, J.V.; Murphy, J.L.; Brodsky, I.S. Tampa Electric Company Phase II FGD System Big Bend Station Units 1 & 2 Advanced Design—Low Cost. In Proceedings of EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: Vol. 1; SO2 Controls; EPRI TR-113187-V1; Atlanta, GA, August 1999; pp 3-1-3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, B. Niro A/S, Denmark. Personal communication, July 31, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Analyzing Electric Power Generation Under CAAA; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation: Washington, DC, March 1998; http://www.epa.gov/capi/ipm/update.htm.
   Google Scholar