Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM_2.5 Aerosol with the Unmix Receptor Model

References

• Solomon, P.A.; Moyers, J.L. Use of a High-Volume Dichotomous Virtual Impactor to Estimate Light Extinction Due to Carbon and Related Species in the Phoenix Haze; Sci. Total Environ. 1984, 36, 169-175.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A.; Moyers, J.L. A Chemical Characterization of Wintertime Haze in Phoenix, Arizona; Atmos. Environ. 1986, 20 (1), 207-213.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Richards, L.W.; Haase, D.L.; McDade, C.; Dietrich, D.L.; Moon, D.; Sloane, C. The 1989-1990 Phoenix PM10 Study, Volume II: Source Apportionment; DRI Document No. 8931.6F1; Desert Research Institute: Reno, NV, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, Z.; Song, X.-H.; Hopke, P.K. Identification of Sources of Phoenix Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1308-1320.
   Google Scholar
• Mar, T.F.; Norris, G.A.; Koenig, J.Q.; Larson, T.V. Associations between Air Pollution and Mortality in Phoenix, 1995-1997; Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108 (4), 347-353.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. History and Fundamentals of Multivariate Air Quality Receptor Models; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 37, 37-42.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. Unmix Version 2.3 Manual; 2001, available with Unmix software ([email protected]).
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R.D.; Ellenson, W.D.; Conner, T.L. Monitoring and Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter near a Large Phosphorous Production Facility; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 1142-1166.
   Google Scholar
• Poirot, R.L.; Wishinski, P.R.; Hopke, P.K.; Polissar, A.V. Comparative Application of Multiple Receptor Methods to Identify Aerosol Sources in Northern Vermont; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4622-4636.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, M.E.; Cary, R.A. Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1996, 25, 221-241.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.W.; Einfeld, W. Origins of Carbonaceous Aerosol in Denver and Albuquerque during Winter; Environ. Intern. 1985, 11, 243-247.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C.; Lewis, C.W.; Collins, J.F. Vehicle-Related Hydrocarbon Source Compositions from Ambient Data: The GRACE/SAFER Method; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28 (5), 823-832.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, W.C.; Sisler, J.F.; Huffman, D.; Eldred, R.A.; Cahill, T.A. Spatial and Seasonal Trends in Particle Concentration and Optical Extinction in the United States; J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99 (D1), 1347-1370.
   Google Scholar
• Tolocka, M.P.; Solomon, P.A.; Mitchell, W.; Norris, G.A.; Gemmill, D.B.; Wiener, R.W.; Vanderpool, R.W.; Homolya, J.B.; Rice, J. East versus West in the US: Chemical Characteristics of PM2 . 5 during the Winter of 1999; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 88-96.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A.G.; McRae, G.J.; Cass, G.R. Mathematical Modeling of the Formation and Transport of Ammonium Nitrate Aerosol; Atmos. Environ. 1983, 17, 949-964.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J.; Lim, H.-J. Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 35-41.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J.; Saxena, P.; Andrews, E. Measuring and Simulating Particulate Organics in the Atmosphere: Problems and Prospects; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2983-3013.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, M.S.; Norris, G.A.; Williams, R.W.; Weinstein, J.P. Personal Exposures to PM2.5 Mass and Trace Elements in Baltimore, MD, USA; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 6511-6524.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M.S.; Friedlander, S.K.; Hidy, G.M. A Chemical Mass Balance for the Pasadena Aerosol; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972, 39, 165-176.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Robinson, N.F.; Chow, J.C.; Henry, R.C.; Kim, B.M.; Pace, T.G.; Meyer, E.L.; Nguyen, Q. The USEPA/DRI Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model, CMB7.0; Envir. Software 1990, 5, 38-49.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C.; Park, E.S.; Spiegelman, C.H. Comparing a New Algorithm with the Classic Methods for Estimating the Number of Factors; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999, 48, 91-97.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C. Multivariate Receptor Modeling by N-Dimensional Edge Detection; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap; Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, No. 57; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Calloway, C.P.; Li, S.; Buchanan, J.W.; Stevens, R.K. A Refinement of the Potassium Tracer Method for Residential Wood Smoke; Atmos. Environ. 1989, 23 (1), 67-69.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Crow, D.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Merrifield, T. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 23-34.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, G.A.; Birch, M.E.; Tolocka, M.P.; Lewis, C.W.; Solomon, P. A Comparison of Particulate Organic and Elemental Carbon Measurements Made with the IMPROVE and NIOSH Method 5040 Protocols; Aerosol Sci. Technol., submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Air Pollutant Emissions Trends: 1900–1998; EPA 454/R-00–002; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Research Triangle Park, NC, March 2000. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/trends98/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, R.A.; McKeen, S.A.; Pearson, J.; Rodgers, M.O.; Lonneman, W.A. Analysis of Motor Vehicle Emissions during the Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study; J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106 (D4), 3559-3567.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, D.B.; Harley, R.A. A Fuel-Based Inventory for Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1998, 48, 352-358.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.alken-murray.com/faq-truk.htm (accessed Jan 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, K.; Coley, T. Automotive Fuels Handbook; Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.: Warrendale, PA, 1990; p 429.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1979; Vol 8, pp 34-47.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R.D. Workshop on Unmix and PMF as Applied to PM2.5 ; Report No. EPA/600/A-00/048; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, June 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J.; Huntzicker, J.J.; Hering, S.V. Investigation of Organic Aerosol Sampling Artifacts in the Los Angeles Basin; Atmos. Environ. 1994, 19, 3061-3071.
   Google Scholar
• McDow, S.R.; Huntzicker, J.J. Vapor Adsorption Artifact in the Sampling of Organic Aerosol: Face Velocity Effects; Atmos. Environ. 1990, 24A, 2563-2571.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B.M.; Cassmassi, J.; Hogo, H.; Zeldin, M.D. Positive Organic Carbon Artifacts on Filter Medium during PM2 . 5 Sampling in the South Coast Air Basin; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 35-41.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R.D. SEM/EDX Data Validation, Quality Assessment, and Standard Operating Procedures; TR-4425–00-01; ManTech Environmental Technology Inc.: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Draxler, R.D. Hysplit 4 Users Guide; Draft NOAA Technical Memorandum; Air Resources Laboratory: Silver Springs, MD, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Saucy, D.A.; Anderson, J.R.; Buseck, P.R. Aerosol Particle Characteristics Determined by Combined Cluster and Principal Components Analysis; J. Geophys. Res. 1991, 96 (D4), 7407-7414.
   Google Scholar
• Katrinak, K.A.; Anderson, J.R.; Buseck, P.R. Individual Particle Types in the Aerosol of Phoenix, Arizona; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 321-329.
   Google Scholar
• Post, J.E.; Buseck, P.R. Characterization of Individual Particles in the Phoenix Urban Aerosol Using Electron-Beam Instruments; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1984, 18, 35-42.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M.; Germani, M.S.; Small, A.M.; Zoller, W.H.; Moyers, J.L. Airborne Plume Study of Emissions from the Processing of Copper Ores in Southeastern Arizona; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 15 (3), 293-298.
   Google Scholar
• National Emissions Trends Air Pollution Point Sources Database; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1996. http://www.epa.gov/air/data/index.html (accessed Jan 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Michaud, D.; Baril, M.; Perrault, G. Characterization of Airborne Dust from Cast Iron Foundries by Physico-Chemical Methods and Multivariate Statistical Analyses; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1993, 43, 729-735.
   Google Scholar
• Zayed, J.; Hong, B.; L’Esperance, G. Characterization of Manganese-Containing Particles Collected from the Exhaust Emissions of Automobiles Running with MMT Additive; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33 (19), 3341-3346.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A.C.; Cackette, T.A. Critical Review—Diesel Engines: Environmental Impact and Control; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 809-847.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Rogge, W.F.; Hildemann, L.M.; Mazurek, M.A.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter Using Organic Compounds as Tracers; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 3837-3855.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Fujita, E.M.; Chow, J.C.; Zielinska, B.; Richards, L.W.; Neff, W.; Dietrich, D. Northern Front Range Air Quality Study Final Report; DRI Document No. 6580–685-8750.1F2; Desert Research Institute: Reno, NV, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J.; Cass, G.R. Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1821-1832.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Richards, L.W.; Anderson, S.R.; Houck, J.E.; Dietrich, D.L. The 1987-88 Metro Denver Brown Cloud Air Pollution Study, Volume III: Data Interpretation; DRI Document No. 8810.1F3; Desert Research Institute: Reno, NV, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Pritchett, L.C.; Pierson, W.R.; Frazier, C.A.; Purcell, R.G. The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance Carbon Analysis System: Description, Evaluation and Applications in U.S. Air Quality Studies; Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A, 1185-1201.
   Google Scholar