253
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Adjusting Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Data for Comparison with Federal Reference Method PM2.5 Measurements in Region 5

, &
Pages 596-607 | Published online: 22 Feb 2012

References

  • 40 CFR Part 50: National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. Fed. Regist. 1997, 62 (138), 2-102.
  • Patashnick, H.; Rupprecht, E.G. Continuous PM10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1991, 41, 1079-1083.
  • Allen, G.; Sioutas, C.; Koutrakis, P.; Reiss, R.; Lurmann, F.W.; Roberts, P.T. Evaluation of the TEOM Method for Measurement of Ambient Particulate Mass in Urban Areas; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 682-689.
  • Mirme, A.; Ruuskanin, J. Comparison of Aerosol Measurements in Urban Environment; J. Aerosol Sci. 1996, 27, s23–s24.
  • Salter, L.F.; Parsons, B. Field Trials of the TEOM and Partisol for PM10 Monitoring in the St Austell China Clay Area, Cornwall, U.K.; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 2111-2114.
  • Ayers, G.P.; Keywood, M.D.; Gras, J.L. TEOM vs. Manual Gravimetric Methods for Determination of PM2.5 Aerosol Mass Concentrations; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3717-3721.
  • Soutar, A.; Watt, M.; Cherrie, J.W.; Seaton, A. Comparison between a Personal PM10 Sampling Head and the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) System; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 4373-4377.
  • Cyrys, J.; Dietrich, G.; Kreyling, W.; Tuch, T.; Heinrich, J. PM2.5 Mea surements in Ambient Aerosol: Comparison between Harvard Impactor (HI) and the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) System; Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 278, 191-197.
  • Chung, A.; Chang, D.P.Y.; Kleeman, M.J.; Perry, K.D.; Cahill, T.A.; Dutcher, D.; McDougall, E. M.; Stroud, K. Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used to Monitor Airborne Particulate Matter; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51, 109-120.
  • Green, D.; Fuller, G.; Barratt, B. Evaluation of TEOM Correction Factors for Assessing the EU Stage 1 Limit for PM10 ; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 2589-2593.
  • King, A.M.; Pless-Mulloli, T.; Merefield, J.; Stone, I. New Directions: TEOMs and the Volatility of U.K. Non-Urban PM10 : A Regulatory Dilemma?; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3209-3212.
  • Mignacca, D.; Stubbs, K. Effects of Equilibrium Temperature on PM10 Concentrations from the TEOM Method in the Lower Fraser Valley; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 1250-1254.
  • SAS/STAT User’s Guide; Release 8.2; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 1999.
  • Data Quality Objectives for Relating Federal Reference Method and Continuous PM2.5 Measurements to Report an Air Quality Index; EPA-454/B-02– 002; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, November 2002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.