Metrics Matter: Conflicting Air Quality Rankings from Different Indices of Air Pollution

References

• NAPAP. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program Biennial Report to Congress: An Integrated Assessment; National Science and Technology Council Committee on Environmental and Natural Resources, NAPAP: Silver Spring, MD, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Cifuentes, L.; Borja-Aburto, V.H.; Gouveia, N.; Thurston, G.; Davis, D.L. Climate Change: Hidden Health Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation; Science. 2001, 293, 1257-1259.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, W.R.; Thom, G.C. A Critical Review of Air Pollution Index Systems in the United States and Canada; J. Air. Pollut. Control Assoc. 1976, 26, 460–470.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, W.R. Environmental Indices: Theory and Practice; Ann Arbor Science: Ann Arbor, MI, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P.J.; Williams, W.P. New Indicator Approaches for Effective Urban Air Quality Management; Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 1999, 6, 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W.A., Ed. Indicators of Environmental Quality; Plenum Press: New York, NY, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Bezuglaya, E.Y.; Shchutskaya, A.B.; Smirnova, I.V. Air-Pollution Index and Interpretation of Measurements of Toxic Pollutant Concentrations; Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27, 773–779.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, F.; Cocchi, D. A Unified Strategy for Building Simple Air Quality Indices; Environmetrics 2002, 13, 243–261.
   Google Scholar
• Ha¨mekoski, K. The Use of a Simple Air Quality Index in the Helsinki Area, Finland; Environ. Manage. 1998, 22, 517–520.
   Google Scholar
• Kassomenos, P.; Skouloudis, A.N.; Lykoudis, S.; Flocas, H.A. “Air-Quality Indicators” for Uniform Indexing of Atmospheric Pollution Over Large Metropolitan Areas; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 1861–1879.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, N. Measuring Environmental Quality: An Index of Pollution; Ecol. Econ. 2000, 35, 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V.K. Development of Air Quality Indices for Mumbai, India; Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 1999, 11, 141–146.
   Google Scholar
• Swamee, P.K.; Tyagi, A. Formation of an Air Pollution Index; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, P.A. Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach; Manage. Sci. 1977, 23, 679–693.
   Google Scholar
• National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, Final Rule. Fed. Regist. 1997, 62, 38855–38896.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M.L.; Hobbs, B.F.; Elliott, E.M.; Ellis, H.; Robinson, Z. An Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Methods in Integrated Assessment of Climate Policy; J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Analysis 2001, 10, 229–256.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.R.; Dennis, R.L.; Ely, D.W. Citizen Participation and Judgment in Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Urban air Quality Policy; Policy Sci. 1984, 17, 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A.E.; Corbett, J.J.; Winebrake, J.J. Controlling Air Pollution From Passenger Ferries: Cost-Effectiveness of Seven Technological Options; J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 2002, 52, 1399–1410.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnick, A.; Portney, P.R. Controlling Urban Air Pollution: A Benefit-Cost Assessment; Science. 1991, 252, 522–528.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, M.D.; Nathwani, J.S. Canada Wide Standard for Particulate Matter and Ozone: Cost-Benefit Analysis Using a Life Quality Index; Risk Analysis 2003, 23, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J.I.; Carrothers, T.J.; Tuomisto, J.T.; Hammitt, J.K.; Evans, J.S. Assessing the Public Health Benefits of Reduced Ozone Concentrations; Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 1215–1226.
   Google Scholar
• Voorhees, A.S.; Araki, S.; Sakai, R.; Sato, H. An Ex Post Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution Control Program in Tokyo; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 391–410.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990; EPA/410/R-97/002; EPA Office of Air and Radiation: Washington, DC, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010; EPA/410/R-99/001; EPA Office of Air and Radiation: Washington, DC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M.; Murphy, J.J.; McCubbin, D.R. The Health and Visibility Cost of Air Pollution: A Comparison of Estimation Methods; J. Environ. Manage. 2002, 64, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Munda, G.; Nijkamp, P.; Rietveld, P. Multicriteria Evaluation in Environmental Management: Why and How? In Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management; Paruccini, M., Ed.; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 1994, pp 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B.F. Choosing How to Choose: Comparing Amalgamation Methods for Environmental Impact Assessment; Environ Impact Assess. Rev. 1985, 5, 301–319.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R.L.; Stewart, T.R.; Middleton, P.; Downton, M.W.; Ely, D.W.; Keeling, M.C. Integration of Technical and Value Issues in Air Quality Policy Formation: A Case Study; Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 1983, 17, 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. Fuzzy Environmental Decision-Making: Applications to Air Pollution; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1865–1877.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L.; Huang, G.H.; Liu, Y.; Fuller, G.A.; Zeng, G.M.A. Fuzzy-Stochastic Robust Programming Model for Regional Air Quality Management Under Uncertainty; Eng. Optimization. 2003, 35, 177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Model, N.; Six, U.; Wittmü[H9252], A.; Gonzales, J. Multicriterial Decisions for Air-Pollution Reduction in Urban Regions. In Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management; Paruccini, M., Ed.; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 1994, pp 63-79.
   Google Scholar
• 32. Schweigert, D. Multicriteria Aspects of Environmental Indices. In Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management; Paruccini, M, Ed.; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 1994, pp 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, A.; Kuula, M.; Cesar, H. Transboundary Air-Pollution in Europe–An Interactive Multicriteria Tradeoff Analysis; Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1992, 56, 263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, J.Y.; Tzeng, G.H. Multicriteria Evaluation for Strategies of Improving and Controlling Air-Quality in the Super City: A Case-Study of Taipei City; J. Environ. Manage. 1994, 40, 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, L.T.; Knight, C.G.; O’Neill, R.V.; Smith, E.R.; Riitters, K.H.; Wick-man, J. Fuzzy Decision Analysis for Integrated Environmental Vulnerability Assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region; Environ. Manage. 2002, 29, 845–859.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G.H.; Tsaur, S.H.; Laiw, Y.D.; Opricovic, S. Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental Quality in Taipei: Public Preferences and Improvement Strategies; J. Environ. Manage. 2002, 65, 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Greenbook: Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. http:// www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/
   Google Scholar
• NCAR. PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and User’s Guide: MM5 Modeling System Version 3; NCAR, Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division: Boulder, CO, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, T.L. Developing Meteorological Fields. In 43
   Google Scholar
• Otte, T.L. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. Personal communication, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Third-Generation Air Quality Modeling System: Models-3 Volume 9a System Installation and Operation Manual; EPA/600/R-98/069a; EPA Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Third-Generation Air Quality Modeling System: Models-3 Volume 9b User Manual; EPA/600/R-98/069b; EPA Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System; EPA/600/R-99/030; Byun, D.W.; Ching, J.K.S., Eds.; EPA Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, and EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R.L.; Byun, D.W.; Novak, J.H.; Galluppi, K.J.; Coast, C.J.; Vouk, M.A. The Next Generation of Integrated Air Quality Modeling: EPA’s Models-3; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 1925–1938.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M.L.; Ellis, H. Comparison of the 1-Hour and 8-Hour National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone Using Models-3; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2003, 53, 1531–1540.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M.L., Ellis, H. Sensitivity Analysis of Tropospheric Ozone to Modified Biogenic Emissions for the Mid-Atlantic Region; Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 1879–1889.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M.L. Ph.D. Thesis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ryerson, T.B.; Trainer, M.; Holloway, J.S.; Parrish, D.D.; Huey, L.G.; Sueper, D.T.; Frost, G.J.; Donnelly, S.G.; Schauffler, S.; Atlas, E.L.; et al. Observations of Ozone Formation in Power Plant Plumes and Implications for Ozone Control Strategies; Science. 2001, 292, 719–723.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants. EPA/600/P-93/004a-cF; EPA Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions for Respiratory Disease; Epidemiology. 1996, 7, 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. Short-Term Fluctuations in Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions of the Elderly for Respiratory Disease; Thorax. 1995, 50, 531–538.
   Google Scholar
• Census Bureau. United States 2000 Census; U.S. Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2000.<br/>
   Google Scholar