References
- Regional Haze Regulations: Final Rule. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, Title 40, 1999; Fed. Regist. 1999, 64, 35714-35774.
- Tracking Progress Under the Regional Haze Rule; EPA-454/B-03-004; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2003.
- Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program; EPA-454/B-03-005; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2003.
- Malm, W.C.; Pitchford, M.L.; Scruggs, M.; Sisler, J.F.; Ames, R.; Copeland, S.; Gebhard, K.; Day, D.E. Spatial and Seasonal Patterns and Temporal Variability of Haze and Its Constituents in the United States; Report; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/Reports/2000/2000.htm (accessed September 27, 2005).
- Gebhart, K.A., Malm, W.C. An Investigation of the Size Distributions of Particulate Sulfate Concentrations Measured during WHITEX. In Transactions Visibility and Fine Particles; Mathai, C.V., Ed.; Air & Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1990; 157-169.
- Molenar, J.V. Analysis of the Real World Performance of the Optec NGN-2 Ambient Nephelometer. In Proceedings of Visual Air Quality, Aerosols, and Global Radiation Balance; Air & Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1997; 243-265.
- Ryan, P.A. Review of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Default Implementation Guideline for the Regional Haze Rule; Electric Power Research Institute: Pal Alto, CA, 2004.
- Malm, W.C., Pitchford, M.L. Comparison of Calculated Sulfate Scattering Efficiencies as Estimated from Size-Resolved Particle Measurements at Three National Locations; Atmos. Environ. 1997, 31, 1315-1325.
- Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Cahill, D.F.; Blumenthal, D.L.; Richards, L.W.; Jorge, H.G. Aerosol Chemical and Optical Properties During the Mt. Zirkel Visibility Study; J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 1118-1125.
- Turpin, B.J.; Lim, H-J. Species Contribution to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 602-610.
- Malm, W.C.; Day, D.E.; Kreidenweis, S.M.; Collett, J.L.; Lee, T. Humidity-Dependent Optical Properties of Fine Particles during the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Study. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 4279.
- El-Zanan, H.S.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Zielinska, B.; Chow, J.C.; Kumar, N. Determination of the Organic Aerosol Mass to Organic Carbon Ratio in IMPROVE Samples; Chemosphere, 2005, 60, 485-496.
- Lowenthal, D.H.; Kumar, N. Variation of Mass Scattering Efficiencies in IMPROVE; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 926-934.
- Press, W.H.; Saul A.T.; Vetterling W.T.; Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Ed; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992.
- IMPROVE Daily Data; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Data/IMPROVE/AsciiData.aspx (accessed September 27, 2005).
- IMPROVE Nephelometer and RH Data. Available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Data/IMPROVE/Data_IMPOptical.aspx (accessed September 27, 2005).