Methods and Results from a New Survey of Values for Eastern Regional Haze Improvements

References

• Mitchell, Robert Cameron; Carson, Richard T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries; Bateman, I.J.; Willis, K.G., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chestnut, L.G.; Rowe, R.D. Preservation Values for Visibility Protection at the National Parks; Draft Final Report under U.S. EPA Cooperative Agreement No. CR813686; Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Economic Analysis Branch: Research Triangle, NC, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Regulatory Impact Analyses for the Particulate Matter and Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Proposed Regional Haze Rule; Innovative Strategies and Economics Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Regulatory Impact Analyses for the Final Regional Haze Rule; Innovative Strategies and Economics Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2000; EPA 410-R-99–001; Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for U.S. Congress, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Policy: Washington, DC., 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, M.A.; Maxwell, C. Exploring a Budget Context for Contingent Valuation Estimates. In Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment; Hausman, J., Ed. North-Holland Publishing Company: New York, 1993. pp. 217-269.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Fed. Regist. 1993, 58 (10), 4601-4614.
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE Home Page, available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/ (accessed October 3, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Molenar, J. Warnings on the Use of Transmissometer Data to Analyze Long-Term Visibility Trends; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/GrayLit/TransDataUseWarning/Trans-DataUseWarning.htm (accessed October 3, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Reconstructing Light Extinction from Aerosol Measurements; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Tools/ReconBext/reconBext.htm (accessed October 3, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE Aerosol Data; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Data/IMPROVE/AsciiData.aspx (accessed October 3, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Prepared by John Molenar of Air Resource Specialists: Fort Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K.V.; Osborne, L. Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a “Scope” Test? A Meta-Analysis; J. Env. Econ. Manage. 1996, 31, 287-301.
   Google Scholar
• Chestnut, L.G.; Dennis, R. Economic Benefits of Improvements in Visibility: Acid Rain Provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 395-402.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J.M.; Lindsay, B.E.; Brown, C.M. Use of the Tobit Model in Contingent Valuation: Experimental Evidence from the Pemigewasset Wilderness Area; J. Env. Manage. 1991, 33, 79-89.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A.C.; Hinkley, D.V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997.
   Google Scholar